Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?

  • 279 Replies
  • 45210 Views
?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #90 on: May 12, 2010, 11:11:52 AM »
Great, so animal cruelty is necessary to corroborate an already widely known hypothesis? Why? The scientists on the studies I've already posted didn't have to molest any animals in order to prove their point.

So you haven't read Itchy's gloating about how he made simple water creatures' tentacles drop off? Why are you defending his experiments if you clearly have no idea he was molesting animals?
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #91 on: May 12, 2010, 11:18:54 AM »
I was just suggesting a better experiment that could more adequately prove the theory that moonlight is harmful. It is your prerogative to prove the theory or not, just don't expect to be believed until you do.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

Lorddave

  • 18170
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #92 on: May 12, 2010, 12:22:02 PM »
Great, so animal cruelty is necessary to corroborate an already widely known hypothesis? Why? The scientists on the studies I've already posted didn't have to molest any animals in order to prove their point.

I'd volunteer to stand out in the moonlight to prove that it's safe.
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

Death-T

  • 504
  • Conspiracy theories are my bread and butter.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #93 on: May 12, 2010, 12:28:58 PM »
Great, so animal cruelty is necessary to corroborate an already widely known hypothesis? Why? The scientists on the studies I've already posted didn't have to molest any animals in order to prove their point.

I'd volunteer to stand out in the moonlight to prove that it's safe.

They would say theat you faked the data..... even if you showed a complete video of you stnading in moonlight for hours and avoiding all contact with sunlight. Just sayin'

But if you do have the time, means, and video camera - please do! Could always use another nail for the coffin..... even though we already have about a couple hundred.
" Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. " - Albert Einstein

" We are imperfect.  We cannot expect perfect government. "  ~William Howard Taft

*

SupahLovah

  • 5167
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #94 on: May 12, 2010, 12:30:26 PM »
Great, so animal cruelty is necessary to corroborate an already widely known hypothesis? Why? The scientists on the studies I've already posted didn't have to molest any animals in order to prove their point.

I'd volunteer to stand out in the moonlight to prove that it's safe.

They would say theat you faked the data..... even if you showed a complete video of you stnading in moonlight for hours and avoiding all contact with sunlight. Just sayin'

But if you do have the time, means, and video camera - please do! Could always use another nail for the coffin..... even though we already have about a couple hundred.
I'd fap to it.
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #95 on: May 12, 2010, 12:31:21 PM »
I don't even understand how moonlight being harmful is even a tenet of FET. It doesn't really make any difference either way and is easily disproved by the billions of people who are exposed to moonlight every night with no ill effects, so why did they come up with this idea in the first place?
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #96 on: May 12, 2010, 12:36:11 PM »
Great, so animal cruelty is necessary to corroborate an already widely known hypothesis? Why? The scientists on the studies I've already posted didn't have to molest any animals in order to prove their point.

So you haven't read Itchy's gloating about how he made simple water creatures' tentacles drop off? Why are you defending his experiments if you clearly have no idea he was molesting animals?

There's a world of difference between primitive sea life and chimpanzees!

I don't even understand how moonlight being harmful is even a tenet of FET. It doesn't really make any difference either way and is easily disproved by the billions of people who are exposed to moonlight every night with no ill effects, so why did they come up with this idea in the first place?

Because it appears to be true. We haven't just sat down and made up everything so that it fits with our theory, we base our beliefs on what the evidence tells us. There is no reason why moonlight should be harmful, it just is harmful.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #97 on: May 12, 2010, 12:38:50 PM »
Great, so animal cruelty is necessary to corroborate an already widely known hypothesis? Why? The scientists on the studies I've already posted didn't have to molest any animals in order to prove their point.

So you haven't read Itchy's gloating about how he made simple water creatures' tentacles drop off? Why are you defending his experiments if you clearly have no idea he was molesting animals?

There's a world of difference between primitive sea life and chimpanzees!

Where do you draw the line? Mice? Rabbits? Dogs? Primates?
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

Lorddave

  • 18170
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #98 on: May 12, 2010, 01:00:01 PM »
Because it appears to be true. We haven't just sat down and made up everything so that it fits with our theory, we base our beliefs on what the evidence tells us. There is no reason why moonlight should be harmful, it just is harmful.

Your definition of appears is questionable.

Evidence:

A specific species of plant had more of a stem toughening cell when exposed only to moonlight.
Animal and human attacks are more violent and frequent at night.
A Hydra stopped moving when exposed to sunlight under a microscope.

....

And that's it.  That's all you have.  Hardly what I'd call evidence.  Hell, you haven't even given any symptoms yet.
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #99 on: May 12, 2010, 01:20:18 PM »
Great, so animal cruelty is necessary to corroborate an already widely known hypothesis? Why? The scientists on the studies I've already posted didn't have to molest any animals in order to prove their point.

So you haven't read Itchy's gloating about how he made simple water creatures' tentacles drop off? Why are you defending his experiments if you clearly have no idea he was molesting animals?

There's a world of difference between primitive sea life and chimpanzees!

There's a world of difference between many animals, they're still animals. They have nerves and feel pain. You condone tormenting primitive fresh water life.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #100 on: May 12, 2010, 03:47:39 PM »
There is no reason why moonlight should be harmful, it just is harmful.

It seems you weren't listening. Try again?

Pst. We get moonlight during the day as well. How many people have died as a consequence of their ignorance?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #101 on: May 14, 2010, 10:57:02 AM »
I fell asleep by the window last night, when I awoke I realized that moonlight was pouring in on me from my window. What precautions should I take to keep myself safer in the future?

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #102 on: May 14, 2010, 11:34:13 AM »
I fell asleep by the window last night, when I awoke I realized that moonlight was pouring in on me from my window. What precautions should I take to keep myself safer in the future?

Buy curtains.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #103 on: May 14, 2010, 11:48:03 AM »
Pst. We get moonlight during the day as well. How many people have died as a consequence of their ignorance?

From a different thread, James told me the sun's rays mostly "cancel out" those of the moon, though you should still shield yourself from the moon's whenever possible.  I really just don't have any words for statements like that.  I'm speechless.

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #104 on: May 14, 2010, 12:30:03 PM »
Pst. We get moonlight during the day as well. How many people have died as a consequence of their ignorance?

From a different thread, James told me the sun's rays mostly "cancel out" those of the moon, though you should still shield yourself from the moon's whenever possible.  I really just don't have any words for statements like that.  I'm speechless.

If they cancel out each other, then by stopping the moon rays you're actually causing more harm to yourself as there's no longer anything to cancel out the suns.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

Death-T

  • 504
  • Conspiracy theories are my bread and butter.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #105 on: May 14, 2010, 04:28:15 PM »
Pst. We get moonlight during the day as well. How many people have died as a consequence of their ignorance?

From a different thread, James told me the sun's rays mostly "cancel out" those of the moon, though you should still shield yourself from the moon's whenever possible.  I really just don't have any words for statements like that.  I'm speechless.

So..... bad sunlight (which is proven) + "bad" moonlight = just bad sunlight? Cuz.... ya' know.... I still get sunburnt.
" Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. " - Albert Einstein

" We are imperfect.  We cannot expect perfect government. "  ~William Howard Taft

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #106 on: May 14, 2010, 05:45:45 PM »
I actually believe that there's a possibility that cases of so-called "sun poisoning" get more severe when the moon is out during the day.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42535
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #107 on: May 14, 2010, 06:25:57 PM »
Do you have any evidence, or are you just playing along?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #108 on: May 14, 2010, 06:33:15 PM »
Well, I have no evidence, per se, except for the obvious fact that the moon emits harmful rays, hence my use of the word "possibility".  If you'd like to test it, be my guest.  I'm unfortunately particularly susceptible to sun poisoning so I fear that if I attempted to test it myself, with the sun and the moon together (!), it might kill me.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42535
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #109 on: May 14, 2010, 06:51:48 PM »
Seeing as the sun is about 449,000 times brighter than the full moon, I really don't see how much damage a new moon can possibly do.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #110 on: May 14, 2010, 08:17:01 PM »
I just wanted to point out that nobody has posted any real evidence that Moonlight is harmful to the human body, which is perhaps one of THE MOST RIDICULOUS things I have ever heard in my life.  What's even funner: that some people here seem to believe it.

So, anyone have any evidence/proof of the harm Moonlight does to oneself?

Trolling makes me angry.

*

Johannes

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2755
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #111 on: May 14, 2010, 11:12:57 PM »
I just wanted to point out that nobody has posted any real evidence that Moonlight is harmful to the human body, which is perhaps one of THE MOST RIDICULOUS things I have ever heard in my life.  What's even funner: that some people here seem to believe it.

So, anyone have any evidence/proof of the harm Moonlight does to oneself?
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=34082.0

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

*

Lord Wilmore

  • Vice President
  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 12107
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #113 on: May 15, 2010, 06:14:41 AM »
I find it quite amusing that you expect everyone else to prove in detail why you are wrong, but are satisfied to give a simple 'no' to support your own arguments.
"I want truth for truth's sake, not for the applaud or approval of men. I would not reject truth because it is unpopular, nor accept error because it is popular. I should rather be right and stand alone than run with the multitude and be wrong." - C.S. DeFord

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42535
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #114 on: May 15, 2010, 07:07:47 AM »
I find it quite amusing that you expect everyone else to prove in detail why you are wrong, but are satisfied to give a simple 'no' to support your own arguments.

Yes, Johannes can be quite amusing that way.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #115 on: May 15, 2010, 08:03:33 AM »
I find it quite amusing that you expect everyone else to prove in detail why you are wrong, but are satisfied to give a simple 'no' to support your own arguments.

A simple "no" is quite sufficient as a summary of a thread which has had at least two spin off threads discussing the validity of its results, don't you think? Or would you prefer I started going over old ground?
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

*

Johannes

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2755
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #116 on: May 15, 2010, 08:16:56 AM »
I find it quite amusing that you expect everyone else to prove in detail why you are wrong, but are satisfied to give a simple 'no' to support your own arguments.

A simple "no" is quite sufficient as a summary of a thread which has had at least two spin off threads discussing the validity of its results, don't you think? Or would you prefer I started going over old ground?
Someone asked for EVIDENCE. And I provided a link to a scientific study. You can't just say "no" to evidence.

When I make concise criticisms it is usually because the math is faulty, the premise is faulty, or the application of math (physics) is faulty. I don't want to take the time to explain things when they are already on the internet. It's a waste of my time to explain to someone why you can't accelerate a particle past the speed of light.

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #117 on: May 15, 2010, 08:26:18 AM »
Someone asked for evidence that moonlight is harmful. You posted a link to a thread that didn't provide any evidence that moonlight is harmful.  ::)
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #118 on: May 15, 2010, 08:55:14 AM »
Pst. We get moonlight during the day as well. How many people have died as a consequence of their ignorance?

From a different thread, James told me the sun's rays mostly "cancel out" those of the moon, though you should still shield yourself from the moon's whenever possible.  I really just don't have any words for statements like that.  I'm speechless.

If the sun cancelled out the moons rays then we wouldn't be able to see the moon. This thread is excellent btw.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Lunar Danger! James and Ichi are the only ones?
« Reply #119 on: May 15, 2010, 09:48:18 AM »
I fell asleep by the window last night, when I awoke I realized that moonlight was pouring in on me from my window. What precautions should I take to keep myself safer in the future?

Buy curtains.

I have curtains, they are those cute lacy deals that let dappled light into the room and totally accentuate my pink carpet.