Creation

  • 10 Replies
  • 1646 Views
?

edlloyd

  • 442
  • +0/-0
Creation
« on: February 09, 2007, 02:22:30 PM »
Creation....

How was the earth formed?

I tried serching for it on the forum, but I couldnt find much.

Thanks for info.

?

GeoGuy

Creation
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2007, 02:31:11 PM »
How Earth was formed is not yet known.

?

edlloyd

  • 442
  • +0/-0
Creation
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2007, 02:32:39 PM »
Quote from: "GeoGuy"
How Earth was formed is not yet known.


So FE has no theory to suggest how it was formed? Where RE does suggest a plasuable theory??

?

GeoGuy

Creation
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2007, 02:33:29 PM »
Right.

?

edlloyd

  • 442
  • +0/-0
Creation
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2007, 02:34:54 PM »
Quote from: "GeoGuy"
Right.


Geo is for or against FE?

?

GeoGuy

Creation
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2007, 02:37:35 PM »
I'm for.

?

edlloyd

  • 442
  • +0/-0
Creation
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2007, 02:38:52 PM »
Quote from: "edlloyd"
Quote from: "GeoGuy"
How Earth was formed is not yet known.


So FE has no theory to suggest how it was formed? Where RE does suggest a plasuable theory??


So if your theory and the RE theory has more plausable theories. What instant made you think the earth was flat?

?

GeoGuy

Creation
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2007, 02:41:48 PM »
The RE theory of Earth's formation is only slightly plausible if we allow for the existance of "gravity". And it requires that Earth be round, which it isn't.

Read Earth not a Globe for proof of Earth's shape. A link to which can be found in my signature.

?

edlloyd

  • 442
  • +0/-0
Creation
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2007, 02:48:24 PM »
Quote from: "GeoGuy"
The RE theory of Earth's formation is only slightly plausible if we allow for the existance of "gravity". And it requires that Earth be round, which it isn't.

Read Earth not a Globe for proof of Earth's shape. A link to which can be found in my signature.


Then I shall read....

?

edlloyd

  • 442
  • +0/-0
Creation
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2007, 02:52:01 PM »
From the introduction...

"The polar projection of the flat earth creates obvious discrepancies with known geography, particularly the farther south you go. Figure 54 inadvertantly illustrates this problem. The Zetetic map has a severly squashed South America and Africa, and Australia and New Zealand in the middle of the Pacific. I think that by the 19th century people would have noticed if Australia and Africa were thousands of miles further apart than expected, let alone if Africa was wider than it was long!"


Right, so interesting start.

Figure 54 - http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/img/fig54.jpg

?

Tom Bishop

Re: Creation
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2007, 06:42:45 PM »
Quote
How was the earth formed?


Sheering and rotational forces in its young life.

Quote
Right, so interesting start.


The introduction is commentary.