« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Ice Wall

  • 21 Replies
  • 3506 Views
?

Ticky

  • 97
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« on: February 07, 2007, 09:55:10 AM »
If the ice wall is such a tightly guarded secret by some huge worldwide conspiracy, then how come so many people seem to know about it?

--Ticky
Logged
ave fun, you have been warned.
*

midgard

  • 1300
  • +0/-0
Re: Ice Wall
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2007, 10:05:35 AM »
Quote from: "Ticky"
If the ice wall is such a tightly guarded secret by some huge worldwide conspiracy, then how come so many people seem to know about it?

--Ticky


I've never actually encountered and Ice Wall Guards when I've been there. Perhaps Diego Draw will be able to answer you as he's come into contact with the guards.
Logged
?

Ticky

  • 97
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2007, 10:10:37 AM »
Shouldn't you be getting paid off to keep quiet, tortured, brainwashed or something?

--Ticky
Logged
ave fun, you have been warned.
?

Ticky

  • 97
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2007, 12:01:30 PM »
no one's saying anything :(

--Ticky
Logged
ave fun, you have been warned.
?

iknowearthisflat

  • 28
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2007, 12:17:27 PM »
Why don't these people show us pictures of the 150 feet ice walls that fence the "flat" earth ? And maybe drop a camera on the other side to see what's out there beyond the flat surface ? Or maybe climb up the wall and bring out the truth ? Fly an aircraft close to the edge and "show us the boundary of the flat earth ?"

Mr Bishop, any thoughts ?
Logged
*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Ice Wall
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2007, 12:23:34 PM »
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5829

People who haven't seen it for themselves are mainly speculating, because it's a necessary and logical conclusion of the flat Earth theory.

~D-Draw
Logged
*

Pipe Dreams

  • 119
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2007, 12:28:26 PM »
Quote from: "DiegoDraw"
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5829

People who haven't seen it for themselves are mainly speculating, because it's a necessary and logical conclusion of the flat Earth theory.

~D-Draw

I don't think it's nessicary or logical. Why couldn't it be a line of snow covered mountains? Seems more logical to me when you consider that there have been periods in the Earth's history when there was next to no ice at the poles.
Logged
quote]The rule is perfect: in all matters of opinion our adversaries are insane. ~ Twain[/quote]
Quote
Et tu, Bruté? ~ Shakespeare
?

djhspawn

Ice Wall
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2007, 12:33:16 PM »
Quote from: "DiegoDraw"
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5829

People who haven't seen it for themselves are mainly speculating, because it's a necessary and logical conclusion of the flat Earth theory.

~D-Draw


yeah, that link is full of nonsense and horrible MS paint work.
Logged
?

Ticky

  • 97
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2007, 12:40:47 PM »
cool, mspaint.

--Ticky
Logged
ave fun, you have been warned.
*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Ice Wall
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2007, 12:43:23 PM »
Quote from: "Pipe Dreams"
I don't think it's nessicary or logical. Why couldn't it be a line of snow covered mountains? Seems more logical to me when you consider that there have been periods in the Earth's history when there was next to no ice at the poles.

What else would keep that atmosphere in in order to provide a livable scenario for animals on Earth? I do hope you realize that we are alive.


~D-Draw
Logged
*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Ice Wall
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2007, 12:43:54 PM »
Quote from: "Ticky"
cool, mspaint.

--Ticky


Prove it.

~D-Draw
Logged
?

Ticky

  • 97
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2007, 12:46:44 PM »
DiegoDraw
I'm not sure I really want to. But hey, you're free to prove it's real if you want.

--Ticky
Logged
ave fun, you have been warned.
?

Ambassadork

  • 231
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2007, 12:48:42 PM »
Not mspaint. Photoshop.

edit:
edit again: Guess I can't copy/paste the EXIF data here... I'll have to take a screenshot later and post it. Or just try opening the image in a text editor and see for yourself.
Logged
?

Meatballsoup

  • 61
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2007, 12:54:41 PM »
Prove it? Someone isn't familiar with the term "anti alias"

The "outer space" in your picture is perfectly aliased, something that doesn't happen (ever) in real pictures. You know this of course, because you are a RE'er who is acting as a straw man for real RE'ers to knock down.

Something both pointless and not necessary.
Logged
1) All galactic bodies we can see in space are spheres.
R2) We have never seen a galactic body in space that was not a sphere.
R3) The Earth is a galactic body.
C1) Therefore, from inductive logic, the Earth is a sphere.
?

iknowearthisflat

  • 28
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2007, 12:57:12 PM »
Quote from: "DiegoDraw"
Quote from: "Ticky"
cool, mspaint.

--Ticky


Prove it.

~D-Draw


Are you kidding me ? You only need your eyes and a brain to prove it;s a photoshopped image.

Mainly because you suck at fabricating false images. NASA does one better than you. LOL
Logged
?

Ambassadork

  • 231
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2007, 12:59:32 PM »
Yeah, dunno if it was pointed out in that thread already (long thread and I'm lazy), but those images were taken with different cameras and in different years. The one with the view of space is from 2003.
Logged
*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Ice Wall
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2007, 01:00:46 PM »
Quote from: "iknowearthisflat"
Are you kidding me ? You only need your eyes and a brain to prove it;s a photoshopped image.

Mainly because you suck at fabricating false images. NASA does one better than you. LOL


Well, then, if my images are so obviously faked, then how can you say that you know that NASA's "sattelite" images aren't fake? Hypocrisy much?

~D-Draw
Logged
?

Ticky

  • 97
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2007, 01:02:04 PM »
I guess DiegoDraw doesn't feel like proving it either.

--Ticky
Logged
ave fun, you have been warned.
?

iknowearthisflat

  • 28
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2007, 01:27:58 PM »
Quote from: "DiegoDraw"
Quote from: "iknowearthisflat"
Are you kidding me ? You only need your eyes and a brain to prove it;s a photoshopped image.

Mainly because you suck at fabricating false images. NASA does one better than you. LOL


Well, then, if my images are so obviously faked, then how can you say that you know that NASA's "sattelite" images aren't fake? Hypocrisy much?

~D-Draw


All I'm saying is that NASA certainly does a better job at convincing people that earth is round. In the lack of a personal visit to the edge of the earth, I can only compare images from the proponents of competing theories to make a judgment. And I must say, the data which they present to support their claim is certainly a lot more voluminous than yours.

Besides, the fact that the claims made by NASA are rooted in Science whereas your claims are rooted in the beliefs of Rowbotham  and christian religious cults doesn't exactly make me think favorably of your opinions.
Logged
?

Ambassadork

  • 231
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #19 on: February 07, 2007, 03:13:29 PM »
Quote from: "DiegoDraw"
Quote from: "iknowearthisflat"
Are you kidding me ? You only need your eyes and a brain to prove it;s a photoshopped image.

Mainly because you suck at fabricating false images. NASA does one better than you. LOL


Well, then, if my images are so obviously faked, then how can you say that you know that NASA's "sattelite" images aren't fake? Hypocrisy much?

~D-Draw

Yeah, but your images are OBVIOUSLY fake.
Logged
*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Ice Wall
« Reply #20 on: February 07, 2007, 03:50:15 PM »
Quote from: "Ambassadork"
Yeah, but your images are OBVIOUSLY fake.


So that makes them worse than the slightly less obviously fake images?


Quote from: "iknowearthisflat"
Besides, the fact that the claims made by NASA are rooted in Science whereas your claims are rooted in the beliefs of Rowbotham  and christian religious cults doesn't exactly make me think favorably of your opinions.


I'm an atheist, and so are most people around here. It has nothing to do with religion, I assure you.

~D-Draw
Logged
?

Ambassadork

  • 231
  • +0/-0
Ice Wall
« Reply #21 on: February 07, 2007, 04:01:11 PM »
NASA's aren't "obviously" fake at all, unless you presuppose Earth to be flat thereby necessitating their fakeness (so much for being open-minded). Yours were blatantly fake.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »