Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.

  • 220 Replies
  • 95544 Views
?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
The video is a good recap of popular flat earth false assertions concerning flight instruments that have been repeatedly used and debunked.

Quote
Flat Earthers prove Flat Earth ... by not understanding airplanes




Flight instruments are another example how flat earthers simply don’t understand, or right out lie.

Grifters of flat earth total ignore how flight instruments and procedures are built specifically to take in account earth’s curvature and rotation.  If the earth was flat, these instruments would be built differently.  Anyone telling you differently are either ignorant or a con. 

?

turbonium2

  • 3781
  • +56/-30
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2025, 04:07:40 AM »
These instruments measure the Earths surface as flat.

Altitude on the ground is the known altitude before a flight goes up into air.

The ascent and descent are measured by the VSI or similar instruments, when the flight first begins in air, as an ascent upward in air at a certain rate of climb, at a certain angle and speed of flight, which is matched by the altimeter in feet above ground.

When at altitude, they go into level flight, not as ascent or a descent, at same altitude along the flight.

And it lands at the correct altitude after the flight ends.

Planes prove that Earths surface is entirely flat by this.

No excuses to believe in a ball Earth anymore
 

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2025, 01:00:10 PM »
These instruments measure the Earths surface as flat.

How?

And why does the gyroscopic artificial horizon have systems built to compensate for the earth’s curvature.


No, gyroscopes are independent of gravity; they work on centripetal forces. It is basic physics.

Quote

https://flatearth.ws/artificial-horizon

An artificial horizon, or attitude indicator, is a flight instrument that indicates the aircraft’s orientation relative to Earth’s horizon and gives an immediate indication of the smallest change of orientation. An artificial horizon utilizes a gyroscope to detect the change of orientation and pendulous vanes to continuously correct the orientation relative to the level.

Flat-Earthers claim that an artificial horizon should drift over time if the airplane is flying over the spherical Earth because the gyroscope will eventually drift and no longer points toward Earth’s center. In reality, an artificial horizon has a self-correcting mechanism, keeping the gyroscope upright if it is displaced for any reason, including by the aircraft’s motion following Earth’s curvature.


Quote
Pendulous Vanes | Pilot Tutorial
Share



Your proof the earth is flat is using a flight instrument that uses a gyroscope and corrects for the known earth’s curvature with gravity and pendulous vanes?

Well, that’s ignorant and embarrassing on your part?

All a flat earther would have to do is inhibit the pendulous vanes and show the instrument doesn’t drift like it would for flying around a sphere.


Altitude on the ground is the known altitude before a flight goes up into air.



You’re babbling.  The VSI doesn’t change if the aircraft stays at a specific pressure band correlating to an altitude.  And the only way to gain altitude is to increase flight surfaces and increase power.

The VSI only reads when the plane leaves a pressure band correlating to a certain altitude. 

Where VSI doesn’t measure “flat”. What happens to VSI indications flying over a mountain range.  It’s doesn’t show the mountain range below.

Turbs, your post is senseless and factual wrong. 

Now address what was actually posted.


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2025, 01:06:43 PM »

When at altitude, they go into level flight,

Do you understand the working definition of level surface.

Quote
Level Surface: A level surface is a curved surface in which all the points are at the same distance from the earth's surface. The continuous surface that is perpendicular to the earth's mean spheroid is known as a level surface.

https://testbook.com/civil-engineering/levelling-in-surveying-definition-and-types#:~:text=Level%20Surface:%20A%20level%20surface,that%20represents%20a%20level%20surface.


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2025, 01:12:47 PM »
Quote
DOES A JET PLANE CONSTANTLY ADJUST ITS NOSE DOWN TO FOLLOW THE CURVATURE OF THE EARTH?

This is an interesting question. A plane will fly at a constant altitude and will follow the curvature of the earth and would not gain altitude during a level flight.

For instance, if a plane is cleared to maintain 35,000 feet, by regulations, the pilot must maintain that level based on a standard barometric pressure setting (29.92 inHg or 1013 millibars)   Hence it would stay at that altitude (FL350) because the pilot is either controlling the plane manually or has engaged the autopilot to achieve that.

There are two basic instruments that enable this procedure – an altimeter and a vertical speed indicator (VSI). The VSI provides short term changes in pressure and indicates whether the plane is climbing or descending. These changes will give an indication to the pilot so that he would level the plane to maintain 35,000 feet. He will adjust the controls very slightly by use of the elevator and trims. This can be performed automatically by the autopilot as well. As such, the flight controls are constantly moving very subtly to maintain the correct attitude.

You said that, if the plane was trimmed for a straight and level flight, it would ‘gain altitude’ while flying as the earth surface ‘fell away’ due to the curvature of the earth. Well, that would probably happen in a perfectly motionless atmosphere where the plane would fly dead ahead, and over time gain altitude (provided it has sufficient thrust) as the earth curves away from under the airplane.

In reality, a constant altitude must be kept using the standard pressure and that means a fixed distance to the earth center of gravity is maintained, making the path of the plane a curved one.

So, a plane is not flying a straight line – geometrically speaking!

Wednesday, 11 February 2015 16:51


https://askcaptainlim.com/does-a-jet-plane-constantly-adjust-its-nose-down-to-follow-the-curvature-of-the-earth/

Turbs.  Aircraft “a constant altitude must be kept using the standard pressure and that means a fixed distance to the earth center of gravity is maintained”. Which means flight instruments measure air density / pressure and have no means to measure if the ground is “flat”.

Sorry Turbs, your whole argument is based on misconceptions.  Or blatant falsehoods.

Why do you embarrass yourself Turbs.  Is it really worth it to play the fool / idiot to promote a useless model like flat earth. 
« Last Edit: April 18, 2025, 01:32:50 PM by DataOverFlow2022 »

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2025, 01:31:57 PM »
Quote
Well, that would probably happen in a perfectly motionless atmosphere where the plane would fly dead ahead, and over time gain altitude (provided it has sufficient thrust) as the earth curves away from under the airplane.


Wednesday, 11 February 2015 16:51

https://askcaptainlim.com/does-a-jet-plane-constantly-adjust-its-nose-down-to-follow-the-curvature-of-the-earth/

Quote

https://www.flightschoolusa.com/how-high-do-planes-fly-altitude-limits/#:~:text=Jet%20engines%20rely%20on%20oxygen%20intake%20for%20combustion%2C%20and%20as,leading%20to%20lower%20fuel%20efficiency.

Most civilians aircraft don’t make enough thrust to fly above 50,000 feet.  So, it’s not like airplanes will just drift up to 80,000 or 90,000 feet. 

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2025, 01:38:11 PM »
Anyway.  More on the workings and design of an artificial horizon.


No, gyroscopes are independent of gravity; they work on centripetal forces. It is basic physics.

Are you referring to the gyroscope in the artificial horizon?  You get it’s not a plane gyroscope.  You understand it’s a system of mechanisms with a gyroscope?  Mechanisms used to correct errors inherent to gyroscopes?  Pretty smart creating a flight instrument that self corrects errors inherent to gyroscopes?

Quote






*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2025, 03:12:24 PM »
These instruments measure the Earths surface as flat.
These instruments do not measure Earth's surface.

Altitude
The instruments being discussed are the attitude indicator, and have nothing at all to do with measuring altitude.

When at altitude, they go into level flight, not as ascent or a descent, at same altitude along the flight.
Just as expected for a RE.
Again, your lies on this topic have been refuted countless times, with you fleeing from that refutation without response countless times.
Stop repeating the same lies only to flee from them and bring them up later.
Each time you do it, you just yet again demonstrate to everyone that you are a lying POS with no interest in the truth at all who is so pathetic that you need to continually repeat these lies instead of just accepting you are wrong and moving on.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2025, 11:28:32 PM »
Guess Turbs can’t handle flight actually proves the earth is spherical.

Turbs, babbles more incoherently than the average flat earther. 

?

turbonium2

  • 3781
  • +56/-30
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2025, 01:31:02 AM »
Planes don’t need to measure their various heights above Earth, it has mountains and undersea bottoms of ground, and planes don’t need to measure them, each has an altitude as well, sea level is 0 feet altitude, planes are set for whatever altitude on ground, they don’t measure over all the rest of Earths surface, which varies over the entire surface, but is all a flat surface at 0 feet altitude or sea level.

Air flows over Earth in a flat path, of course. We know what happens if we don’t travel level to air, it conflicts with the level flow of air, in normal conditions, and creates turbulence, and the air always wins that battle, every time.

They’ve now made up a most ludicrous and nutty pack of nonsense ever told to us.

Of course, everything is solved by their greatest bs story they had made up long ago.

They have nothing to prove it exists, cannot demonstrate it exists with any objects on Earth, and proves it’s just bs.

Which they use as an ‘answer’ for everything that they cannot actually account for.

Curved surfaces and curved flight paths would certainly be measured for as a curve, if there was a curved surface or curved flight path, which would be from the plane itself, a constant and steady descent, which is perhaps 3 or 5 feet per minute of flight at 500 mph, and we would always fly planes in constant descents, even for short distances. The whole Earth would be curved, all over it, every distance on it.

There is nothing about your made up force to begin with, it doesn’t exist, that’s why they cannot ever prove it exists or demonstrate it exists. If we can prove and demonstrate magnetic force exists, we’d surely be able to prove and demonstrate your ludicrous force exists too, but even easier than magnetic force is.

We have a made up force that pulls down all things from air to the surface while for absolutely no reason or logic, adjusts its strength to each objects mass, and pulls them all down to the surface at the very same speed!

It gets worse from that point, but I digress.

Planes measure for level flight in air, which is a flat and straight and horizontal path over the Earth, which is also flat.

There’s no proof of anything in their excuse even exists to start with, so it’s ridiculous that they use such crap in combination for their story.

Nobody on Earth knows what is under a few thousand feet of Earths surface. Making up a ‘core’ in the center of their ball Earth is complete nonsense, without a shred of proof for it being true!

Then they add in their made up bs story of a great universal force which exists in all things, which pulls in other objects with less of their made up force. Except they can’t ever prove it, which would be very easy to prove, if it wasn’t just made up and told was true!

Hey, how about using our instruments and their measurements as indicated on them as true, as real? That’s better than making up bs stories that never work at all.

Our instruments measure as indicated, that’s why we built them, and why we have gauges on them to measure things for us.

Imagine how that would ever work! What exactly are the instruments on planes measuring here? Why would they measure for something that we don’t even know about in the first place?

‘Ok Ralph, I want to let you know that when you’re flying a plane, the gauge will measure for level flight, but we don’t know what it really means by that. I heard it’s now called level to Earths curvature and our instruments are hit by waves of gravity in Earths core, and makes the read level over the ball Earth surface, or maybe it’s curved air pressure, or both, I have no idea.  Anyway, forget what I just said, it’s bs anyway. We know what level means, and know how to measure for level, which has nothing to do with any curves’

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2025, 03:40:35 AM »
Planes don’t need to measure their various heights above Earth,

These instruments measure the Earths surface as flat.

So, you lied Turbs.

You done being a troll, spamming and derailing the thread.


Stay on topic and address how an artificial horizon works. And why they are built to be self correcting for a spherical earth.

No why does the gyroscopic artificial horizon have systems built to compensate for the earth’s curvature.


No, gyroscopes are independent of gravity; they work on centripetal forces. It is basic physics.

Quote

https://flatearth.ws/artificial-horizon

An artificial horizon, or attitude indicator, is a flight instrument that indicates the aircraft’s orientation relative to Earth’s horizon and gives an immediate indication of the smallest change of orientation. An artificial horizon utilizes a gyroscope to detect the change of orientation and pendulous vanes to continuously correct the orientation relative to the level.

Flat-Earthers claim that an artificial horizon should drift over time if the airplane is flying over the spherical Earth because the gyroscope will eventually drift and no longer points toward Earth’s center. In reality, an artificial horizon has a self-correcting mechanism, keeping the gyroscope upright if it is displaced for any reason, including by the aircraft’s motion following Earth’s curvature.


Quote
Pendulous Vanes | Pilot Tutorial
Share



Your proof the earth is flat is using a flight instrument that uses a gyroscope and corrects for the known earth’s curvature with gravity and pendulous vanes?

Well, that’s ignorant and embarrassing on your part?

All a flat earther would have to do is inhibit the pendulous vanes and show the instrument doesn’t drift like it would for flying around a sphere.


Now address what was actually posted.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2025, 03:42:28 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2025, 04:08:53 PM »
Planes don’t need to measure their various heights above Earth
Except they can actually measurements of the distance to the ground at various stages of flight, especially landing.

Air flows over Earth in a flat path, of course.
Notice how here you are asserting Earth is flat?
Meaning your argument is entirely circular.
You are assuming Earth is flat, to say that planes measure for flat, to say Earth is flat.

And again, nothing to do with gyroscopes.

They have nothing to prove it exists, cannot demonstrate it exists with any objects on Earth, and proves it’s just bs.
You mean there is plenty showing it exists which you just choose to ignore because you hate reality.

a constant and steady descent
Except you have already had this pathetic BS refuted countless times, all by the simple fact there is no basis for it being a descent rather than an ascent.
And again, it has NOTHING to do with gyroscopes.

You spam so much BS, all because you can't defend your wilful rejection of reality.

Again, deal with the gyroscopic instruments.

*

Smoke Machine

  • 3975
  • +19/-20
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2025, 04:10:29 PM »
Planes don’t need to measure their various heights above Earth, it has mountains and undersea bottoms of ground, and planes don’t need to measure them, each has an altitude as well, sea level is 0 feet altitude, planes are set for whatever altitude on ground, they don’t measure over all the rest of Earths surface, which varies over the entire surface, but is all a flat surface at 0 feet altitude or sea level.

Air flows over Earth in a flat path, of course. We know what happens if we don’t travel level to air, it conflicts with the level flow of air, in normal conditions, and creates turbulence, and the air always wins that battle, every time.

They’ve now made up a most ludicrous and nutty pack of nonsense ever told to us.

Of course, everything is solved by their greatest bs story they had made up long ago.

They have nothing to prove it exists, cannot demonstrate it exists with any objects on Earth, and proves it’s just bs.

Which they use as an ‘answer’ for everything that they cannot actually account for.

Curved surfaces and curved flight paths would certainly be measured for as a curve, if there was a curved surface or curved flight path, which would be from the plane itself, a constant and steady descent, which is perhaps 3 or 5 feet per minute of flight at 500 mph, and we would always fly planes in constant descents, even for short distances. The whole Earth would be curved, all over it, every distance on it.

There is nothing about your made up force to begin with, it doesn’t exist, that’s why they cannot ever prove it exists or demonstrate it exists. If we can prove and demonstrate magnetic force exists, we’d surely be able to prove and demonstrate your ludicrous force exists too, but even easier than magnetic force is.

We have a made up force that pulls down all things from air to the surface while for absolutely no reason or logic, adjusts its strength to each objects mass, and pulls them all down to the surface at the very same speed!

It gets worse from that point, but I digress.

Planes measure for level flight in air, which is a flat and straight and horizontal path over the Earth, which is also flat.

There’s no proof of anything in their excuse even exists to start with, so it’s ridiculous that they use such crap in combination for their story.

Nobody on Earth knows what is under a few thousand feet of Earths surface. Making up a ‘core’ in the center of their ball Earth is complete nonsense, without a shred of proof for it being true!

Then they add in their made up bs story of a great universal force which exists in all things, which pulls in other objects with less of their made up force. Except they can’t ever prove it, which would be very easy to prove, if it wasn’t just made up and told was true!

Hey, how about using our instruments and their measurements as indicated on them as true, as real? That’s better than making up bs stories that never work at all.

Our instruments measure as indicated, that’s why we built them, and why we have gauges on them to measure things for us.

Imagine how that would ever work! What exactly are the instruments on planes measuring here? Why would they measure for something that we don’t even know about in the first place?

‘Ok Ralph, I want to let you know that when you’re flying a plane, the gauge will measure for level flight, but we don’t know what it really means by that. I heard it’s now called level to Earths curvature and our instruments are hit by waves of gravity in Earths core, and makes the read level over the ball Earth surface, or maybe it’s curved air pressure, or both, I have no idea.  Anyway, forget what I just said, it’s bs anyway. We know what level means, and know how to measure for level, which has nothing to do with any curves’

For a guy who denies Earth is a globe and has no fucking idea what other shape the ground he walks on is, you sure do talk the big talk.

Measuring for level is ordinarily an immediate Earth concern, and only relevant to your immediate environment.

Likewise, it's relevant to a pilot who doesn't want to crash the plane he/she is immediately flying.
For the overall shape of Earth to be flat, requires billions of people and billions of pieces of information about Earth to be wrong. Do the maths.

?

turbonium2

  • 3781
  • +56/-30
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #13 on: April 26, 2025, 09:32:19 PM »

You’re babbling.  The VSI doesn’t change if the aircraft stays at a specific pressure band correlating to an altitude.  And the only way to gain altitude is to increase flight surfaces and increase power.

The VSI only reads when the plane leaves a pressure band correlating to a certain altitude. 


It reads any change in air pressure that isn’t level or horizontal in air, within a few mm or so, and the gauge moves up or down.

The most important part here, is how it actually measures for pressure. Around the entire plane, not one tiny point on the plane, in its center or whatever.

Level is measured over a distance or length or span, between two separate points.

Any surface or path or line, is only measurable over a distance or span or length between two separate points.

If the Earths surface or air above it was curved, it would have to curve over the whole surface, which would be extremely difficult to measure and account for, and would require very different instruments than we use today. 

Levels measure for only one thing- a flat and straight and horizontal surface or path. They simply cannot measure for a curved surface or any other surface than a flat and horizontal surface.

What would your ball Earth curvature be over a span of two feet, or over 500 feet?

8 inches per mile squared, becomes smaller and smaller less than a mile out. That means, it wouldn’t be 4 inches of curvature over a half mile, it would be less than that. Over a span of two feet, the curvature would be extremely small, but that’s your big problem, that fails to work at all.

It would only be measured for with specialized instruments, which are able TO measure such small curves.  Since it is curved over the whole surface, it must always be curved, and  cannot EVER be flat, anywhere.

Our instruments on planes, or a laser level, or spirit level, and so forth, measure over a span or distance or length. NOT on a single point in their middle, or whatever. A single point on a surface isn’t what they only measure for, they measure every point over the instrument for level. If they only measured one point in its center, it could be flat over that one tiny point, and curved on each side of that one flat point. That’s completely  ridiculous. How would it possibly measure a curved surface or flat surface with one point on them?

And even worse, the curve would have to be measured from the middle of such instruments, because the curve would go down from the middle point of an instrument on top of the ball.

Not for a laser level, of course, which measures out in one direction with a straight beam of light outward over a surface, But we already know they couldn’t measure for any curves if they existed, only for flat and straight and horizontal and LEVEL surfaces!

It’s time to stop trying to make a curve we cannot see, or cannot measure for, it is because there IS no curve at all




?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #14 on: April 27, 2025, 01:29:23 AM »

It reads any change in air pressure that isn’t level or horizontal in air, within a few mm or so, and the gauge moves up or down.



If you think it measures level ground, what happens when an aircraft flies over a mountain range.

All a flat earther would have to do is inhibit the pendulous vanes and show the instrument doesn’t drift like it would for flying around a sphere.

Do you understand this thread is about the gyroscope in an artificial horizon and how it is built to prevent drift flying around a spherical earth. 

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2025, 01:38:40 AM »

If the Earths surface or air above it was curved, it would have to curve over the whole surface, which would be extremely difficult to measure and account for, and would require very different instruments than we use today. 



WTF?

Why.  The pressure at 30,000 feet is the pressure at 30,000 feet.  The only way an airplane can change altitude disregarding turbulence that throws a plane around, is changing flight surfaces and changing power. So once it’s set to fly at 30,000 feet it’s going to fly at 30,000 feet correcting for turbulence. 

Again..

All a flat earther would have to do is inhibit the pendulous vanes and show the instrument doesn’t drift like it would for flying around a sphere.

Do you understand this thread is about the gyroscope in an artificial horizon and how it is built to prevent drift flying around a spherical earth.

Hello, Turbo.  Do you understand this thread. Do you understand why the gyroscope in an artificial horizon has to have auxiliary systems to prevent drift flying around a spherical earth.   All a flat earther would have to do is charter a flight and take an artificial horizon along with the systems preventing drift from flying around a globe inhibited, and compare it to the onboard working artificial horizon.  Turbs, do you understand?  Hello! 

?

turbonium2

  • 3781
  • +56/-30
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2025, 02:13:56 AM »
They don’t measure for flights of planes over a ball Earth, planes use instruments to measure for level and horizontal flight over a flat Esrth.

Planes use static pressure of the air surrounding the plane to measure for level flight, and it constantly measures for level over the entire flight, over and over and over again, in countless sections that overlap each other, continuously.

If the air curved over a curved Earth, it would need to measure for a curve of a few mm and would not measure as level, but we have no such instruments that could ever measure for that.

Flying in a curved path isn’t done with planes, except in stunt planes or in air shows that is.

To fly over Earths supposed curvature would be a constant and slight path of descent to maintain the same altitude or close to it anyway.

That would be the physical reality of its flight path, a constant curving down path. If the air also flowed in a curved path above Earth, the plane would never fly level at all.

Instruments in planes don’t and can’t measure for a curved flight path, and have it read as a level flight path.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #17 on: April 27, 2025, 03:14:08 AM »
They don’t measure for flights of planes over a ball Earth, m

  Hello.  Turbo.  Do you understand this thread, the reference material, and the design of the gyroscope for the artificial horizon designed with pendulous vanes to specifically prevent drift from flying around a spherical earth.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #18 on: April 27, 2025, 03:30:54 AM »

within a few mm or so,

Which is a lie.  List one barometer based altimeter for aircraft that is listed as calibrated more accurate than in tens of feet.  Much less one calibrated to be accurate in a few millimeters. 



Note.  Added..

Quote
Section 2. Barometric Altimeter Errors and Setting Procedures

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap7_section_2.html

If the difference from the known field elevation and the altitude read from the altimeter is plus or minus 75 feet or greater, the accuracy of the altimeter is questionable and the problem should be referred to an appropriately rated repair station for evaluation and possible correction.


Seems like as long as a barometer based altimeter reads with less than 75 feet error is acceptable?  Much different than a few millimeters. 

Then correcting for turbulence is a greater factor than the earth’s curvature.

Where Turbo, you still need to account for the gyroscopes in artificial horizons requiring systems/designs to prevent drift from earth’s curvature. 


« Last Edit: April 27, 2025, 04:04:04 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #19 on: April 27, 2025, 04:17:25 PM »
It reads any change in air pressure that isn’t level or horizontal in air, within a few mm or so, and the gauge moves up or down
It measures air pressure. There is no magical flat reference for it.
And do you have any evidence for your claim of a few mm or so?

So again, your argument is entirely circular.
You baselessly assert that Earth is flat so that regions of equal air pressure are flat, to baselessly assert Earth is flat.
If instead you accept that air pressure will follow the general shape of Earth, then you recognise it is useless at measuring

The most important part here, is how it actually measures for pressure. Around the entire plane, not one tiny point on the plane, in its centre or whatever.
You mean your baseless assertion, which remains vague crap which you don't even explain.
Are you suggesting that they have multiple separate altimeters which measure the altitude at separate points on the plane?
Why would they bother with that at all?

More importantly, consider just how useless that would be over the length of a plane for determining the curvature of Earth.

Your argument remains pure BS.

Level is measured over a distance or length or span, between two separate points.
No, level is measured at a point.
You can then have other things go through that point which is level.

If the Earths surface or air above it was curved, it would have to curve over the whole surface, which would be extremely difficult to measure and account for
The problem for you is that these are intrinsically tied together.
With it being so difficult to measure for over such a tiny distance, it becomes completely unnecessary to account for it.
It is only when it becomes easy to measure that it becomes a problem, at which point it is easy to account for.

Levels measure for only one thing
Perpendicular to down.
They do not measure for any particular shape.

For example, a spot level in an analytical balance, is just measuring level at that spot. It is the rest of the balance which then carries that level to be useful.
Likewise, you can level a clock, based upon the position of the 3 and 9. But that isn't making sure anything is straight.

Over a span of two feet, the curvature would be extremely small
i.e. it would be so insignificant there would be no need to account for it.
Especially given the imperfections in the tools used to measure level would be far greater.

You aren't helping yourself here. You are showing there is no problem, and then lying to everyone.

cannot EVER be flat
But can be measured as "flat" with imprecise tools which lack the precision to measure for such a tiny curve.

This has been explained to you repeatedly.

You continually ignoring this and repeatedly lying to everyone just shows you are a dishonest, lying POS with absolutely no integrity and no concern for the truth.

And again, NONE OF THAT addresses gyroscopic instruments which is what this topic was on.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #20 on: May 03, 2025, 02:36:52 AM »
Poor Turbs, can’t word salad his way out of why a gyroscope for an artificial horizon has to be designed a specific way to prevent drift flying around a spherical earth.  That things have to be engineered a specific way to work their most efficient for an environment provided by a spherical earth.

Demonstrable proof the earth is spherical. 

?

turbonium2

  • 3781
  • +56/-30
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #21 on: May 09, 2025, 11:55:13 PM »
Gyroscopes aren’t used for a ball Earth or a drifting above a ball Earth, that’s complete bs.

They are another instrument used to measure for straight and level flight, like the main instruments are used for.

They aren’t modeled or designed to account for flying over a big ball Earth, in any way at all.

They measure for straight and level flight, measure for any drift from straight and level flight. In all directions.


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #22 on: May 10, 2025, 01:43:03 AM »
Gyroscopes aren’t used for a ball Earth or a drifting above a ball Earth, that’s complete bs.



Address what was posted.

Poor Turbs, can’t word salad his way out of why a gyroscope for an artificial horizon has to be designed a specific way to prevent drift flying around a spherical earth.  That things have to be engineered a specific way to work their most efficient for an environment provided by a spherical earth.

Demonstrable proof the earth is spherical.


Turbs.  Yiu just spam threads.

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #23 on: May 10, 2025, 03:38:41 PM »
Gyroscopes aren’t used for a ball Earth or a drifting above a ball Earth, that’s complete bs.
Your statement certainly is BS.

They aren’t modeled or designed to account for flying over a big ball Earth, in any way at all.
Then what's with the build in righting mechanism that does just that?
It certainly seems like they are designed to account for flying over a large round Earth.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2025, 02:12:05 PM »
Gyroscopes aren’t used for a ball Earth or a drifting above a ball Earth, that’s complete bs.


Hmm.  While you ignore the real and measurable dip of the horizon.

Anyway.  The artificial horizon uses a gyroscope that is designed to correct for drift for flying over the spherical earth. 

They are another instrument used to measure for straight and level flight, like the main instruments are used for.

There are instruments that measure the absolute altitude above sea level that only need to be accurate to 75 feet that do not show actual ground clearance if flying over a tall mountain.

What instrument shows “level flight” while in flight?  The artificial horizon that uses a gyroscope that corrects for drift while flying over a spherical earth? 

Equipotential: a Property of the Surface of Water


The surface of the sea is a level surface.

By the way.  The surveying definition of level surface. 

Quote
Level Surface : A Curved surface that at every point is perpendicular to the local plumb line. The plumb linemeans the direction in which the gravity acts. Level Surfaces are approximately spheroidal in the shape. The common example of a level surface is a body of the still water.


https://surveyingwithsamo.wordpress.com/


They aren’t modeled or designed to account for flying over a big ball Earth, in any way at all.

Artificial horizons are most definitely manufactured to correct for drift while flying over a spherical earth.  To say otherwise is a lie.  A false assurance. 

Quote
Pendulous Vanes | Pilot Tutorial
Share




« Last Edit: May 16, 2025, 02:14:15 PM by DataOverFlow2022 »

?

turbonium2

  • 3781
  • +56/-30
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #25 on: May 17, 2025, 02:46:15 AM »
You mean we can’t measure for a curve, yet somehow can adjust for it?

Either a curve exists and is measured for, or it doesn’t exist TO be measured for!

If Earths surface IS curved, it has to be measurable AS a curve, with some sort of instruments we don’t even have, levels measure for FLAT surfaces, not curved ones, they cannot measure for a curve, in any way at all.

Levels measure over a distance or span between two points, as a straight and horizontal path or line or distance.

There is no possible way they COULD measure for any curve, if it did exist.

Do you even know how we CAN measure for a curved surface?

Let’s say we have two sheets of aluminum or plastic, each one 4 feet square.

One is entirely flat, the other is slightly curved over it.

If we put a level on the flat sheet, and move it along the sheet, it measures as flat and level. 

But the level cannot measure the curved sheet because it’s not flat and level. It has a slight curve over it.

They are two completely different surfaces, one is flat and the other is curved and not flat.

The surface of Earth IS flat, so it’s hard to imagine how it would look and how to measure for it. We don’t need to measure for a curve because none exists.

We’d certainly have to measure for a curve if it DID exist, account for a curve on flights, and so on!

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #26 on: May 17, 2025, 03:55:15 AM »
Planes don’t need to measure their

You’re spamming the thread.


The curvature can be measured in various was as provided to you.

Like the very real and measurable dip of the horizon.

Where, one.  The only way to gain altitude is for the aircraft to change flight surfaces and increase power to generate more thrust.

Where two, …

Quote
The design and physics of airplanes is such that they hold a certain trimmed altitude and speed, following the curvature of the earth automatically, even without any intervention of the pilot or autopilot system. Pilots don't have to drop the nose to correct for curvature. The interactive physics simulation of an airplane on this page shows how this works. The physics model and the corresponding behaviour of the airplane are explained. The Source code and the equations are described in detail.

https://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=How+Airplanes+follow+the+Curvature+of+the+Earth%2C+Physics+Simulation

So, the pilot if you understood real physics isn’t fighting to maintain altitude without flying off into space.


Where if you think there is no gravity, why do the aerodynamics of the plane have very real center of gravity that has to be designed correctly in reference to the aircraft’s center of pressure.

Which still as nothing to do with the artificial horizon will drift if the gyroscope that drives the instrument isn’t built to correct for drift to flying over a sphere.

The fact that artificial horizon’s are built to prevent drift flying over the spherical earth shows curvature can indeed be measured.  Using dip of the horizon is just more direct.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2025, 03:57:32 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8424
  • +49/-96
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #27 on: May 17, 2025, 04:21:01 AM »
Sorry to spam the thread.  Not really measuring?  But proofs the earth is known to be curved. 

It’s a rather simple experiment.  Just takes coordination.

Quote

Activity: Measuring the Earth's Curvature II
One of the first people to make a very accurate measurement of the circumference of the Earth was Eratosthenes, a Greek philosopher who lived in Alexandria around 250B.C. He was told that on a certain day during the summer (June 21) in a town called Syene, which was 4900 stadia (1 stadia = 0.16 kilometers) to the south of Alexandria, the sunlight shown directly down the well shafts so that you could see all the way to the bottom. Eratosthenes knew that the sun was never quite high enough in the sky to see the bottom of wells in Alexandria and he was able to calculate that in fact it was about 7 degrees too low. Knowing that the sun was 7 degrees lower at its highpoint in Alexandria than in Syene and assuming that the sun's rays were parallel when they hit the Earth, Eratosthenes was able to calculate the circumference of the Earth using a simple proportion: C/4900 stadia = 360 degrees/ 7 degrees. This gives an answer of 252,000 stadia or 40,320 km, which is very close to today's measurements of 40,030 km.

With the help of another classroom and teacher who is located far (several hundred miles), to the North or South of you, your class can perform a similar experiment. Alternatively, one student or a group of students who travel for spring break could perform this experiment during their trip. Contact information for interested teachers can be submitted and received here:



https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~dns/teachersguide/MeasECAct2.html

Seems like an easy thing to do with all the talking head flat earthers over the works with YouTube channels.

But I guess there are several other proofs that already prove’s the earth is spherical.

There is a person on YouTube,
Jos Leys? The individual likes to do computer models and set them to music. 

The individual also shows flat earth modeling vs reality.  Usually for sun and shadows.

Quote
Debunking flat Earth using only a stick.











The below video by the same person shows the actual path the stick shadow traveled in France for a time around the equinox.

Quote














Or…


Quote
LAHAINA NOON IN HAWAIʻI: WHEN AND WHERE TO SEE IT (2025)

Did you know there’s a moment in Hawaiʻi when your shadow completely disappears? This rare tropical phenomenon, known as Lāhainā Noon, happens only twice a year—and only in the tropics. Here’s everything you need to know to witness it.




https://www.lovebigisland.com/hawaii-blog/lahaina-noon-when-and-where/

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #28 on: May 17, 2025, 03:55:46 PM »
You mean we can’t measure for a curve, yet somehow can adjust for it?
No, I'm saying you don't need to adjust for it, because in normal operation, you will do so automatically.

e.g. if you are in a plane and trying to maintain level flight, you will naturally follow the curve by maintaining that level.
No specific adjustment needs to be made for it.

Either a curve exists and is measured for, or it doesn’t exist TO be measured for!
And the RE curve does exist and is measured for. Just not over a tiny distance where it doesn't matter.

If Earths surface IS curved, it has to be measurable AS a curve, with some sort of instruments we don’t even have
You might not have them, but surveyors do.
They are called theodolites.
The surface is curved and is measured as curved.

The surface of Earth IS flat, so it’s hard to imagine how it would look and how to measure for it.
Wrong again.
It is curved.
But you are desperate to pretend it is flat so you appeal to your own wilful ignorance.
If Earth was flat, it would be trivial to imagine how it would look and measure for if it was curved.

We’d certainly have to measure for a curve if it DID exist, account for a curve on flights, and so on!
No, we wouldn't.
And this just further demonstrates your own dishonsety.
If it is so hard you can't imagine how to measure for it or even explain how to account for it, then you have no way to know for certain that we would have to measure for it and account for it on a flight.

You are just spouting whatever dishonest BS you can think of to pretend the curve isn't real.

Instead of just repeating the same pathetic BS, why don't you try justifying any of it?

?

turbonium2

  • 3781
  • +56/-30
Re: Airplane gyroscopic instruments proves FE made useless long ago.
« Reply #29 on: May 23, 2025, 10:20:02 PM »
What do you think our instruments are for?

Why is the Earths surface so important to know as flat, has been known as flat for thousands of years, is the very reason our instruments are designed to measure for a flat surface and horizontal lines.

Look at how the compass is designed and used on a flat Earth. It’s not designed to guide us around a ball Earth or curved surface of a ball Earth.

It points to the center of flat Earth, and out from the center in an expanding circle.

Our instruments measure for a flat and horizontal path or line, and cannot measure for anything else but for a flat and horizontal line or path or surface.

That’s why we made them for that purpose. No other purpose but that.

Saying we cannot measure for a curve is because we have no curve to be measured for, why would we have to use such instruments to measure for a curve when no curve exists?

There’s no reason or logic to have instruments that measure for any curved lines or surfaces with levels that cannot measure for a curve, it’s not because it’s too small a curve to be measured for, it’s because levels aren’t meant to measure for ANY curves of ANY size at all. How could they measure for something they aren’t designed to measure for?

Because you want an excuse for a non existent curve to be so small and not measurable because it’s too small!!

Except it’s big enough a curve to make ships disappear from sight when only three miles away, but too small to measure for it!!