Hmmm, you're right. Treating you like a child is probably wrong.
Right, so upset that you are shown to be wrong, you act even worse.
You truly are pathetic.
What? I'm only giving you the same respect that you have given my ideas in the past.
And more delusional BS.
I gave your ideas respect.
I read them and thought about them and responded to them giving you a chance to defend them.
But you decided not to.
You decided to ignore all the problems with them.
So they were then given the respect they deserve, absolutely none.
Until you start defending them and address the massive issues with them, why should they get any respect?
Meanwhile, you have never given me respect.
Notice that you pretend toward science, but have a superstitious and nonsensical idea that looks at things you don't understand as magic.
No, I am simply pointing out how your garbage continually relies upon magic.
You have no explanation at all, and just pretend it works, just like would happen with pure magic.
If anything, it is what YOU don't understand, because YOU are the one continually refusing to explain it.
Even though I have explained the simple reality of buoyancy over and over again
No, you haven't.
Instead, you repeat the same crap.
You may as well be saying you flick your wand, say wingardium leviosa and it levitates.
It isn't explaining it at all.
I have raised several key issues which you continually ignore because you have no ability to explain them.
you prefer the notion that objects hanging upside down on a spinning globe is rational
No, I dismiss that as your dishonest strawman.
Back in reality, that is people standing upright on a spinning globe.
Do you think compasses are "northside south" in the eastern hemisphere?
Because that is the level of your stupidity here, which has been explained to you countless times.
The RE model does NOT have people hanging upside down.
Stop repeating that pathetic strawman.
while people standing upright on a plateau-like disc somehow is worthy of being called magic.
Because you ignore everything else associated with it.
This is why I have taken to treating you like a child, and now like a rough beast. Because like a trained animal, you will always do what your overlords tell you.
And more delusional BS.
Why not be honest for once?
You have taken to treating me like a child, because I have so easily demonstrated massive holes in your model. And unlike some others here, don't bite at whatever BS you want to throw at them to deflect.
Because you have no way to respond without your dishonesty being further demonstrated and the massive flaws in your model being further demonstrated you resort to this dishonest pathetic BS.
I have no overlords to tell me what to do.
I just care about the truth, unlike you.
No, I don't have to answer your questions
If you want everyone to know you are a dishonest, lying POS, with absolutely no concern for the truth, then sure keep ignore them.
But if you want people to think you are honest and have a working, coherent model, you do need to address them, as they show your model does not work.
I believe this is called cohesion. And some adhesion, given air is a mixture.
Wrong again, cohesion keeps solids and liquids in tact. It is negligible for a gas.
The change from solid/liquid to gas is because the molecules have enough internal energy to overcome the cohesive forces.
When air molecules stick together in a bond, this forms a dense mass. The lower pressure up top is consistent with less dense materials floating to the top.
No it isn't, because it is the same substance having a different density and pressure.
And more problematic are things like water, where there is no significant change in density.
But for both, you have the massive problem of no reason for that difference in density/pressure, so no reason for it to separate.
this means it can lift more weight per square inch
Why? What is there to resist?
There's no downward force. You're just in poor shape.
If there is no downwards force there is nothing to resist. You should be able to place the weight there in mid air, release it, and have it stay there.
Considering you like games, you can even simulate this in games.
You can have a simple physics engine where things only accelerate when the player interacts.
Or you can have one where all objects experience a downwards force.
In the former, you pick up a weight and release it and it stays there.
In the latter it goes back down.
Again if you want to pretend it is some magical buoyancy, you need to explain:
Why this makes it move at all,
Why down,
Why at a particular rate,
Why this rate varies over Earth,
Why/How this creates a pressure gradient,
Why/How this pressure gradient doesn't just push everything up.
If you can't, your BS is DOA.
Until you can address those points, your BS does not work, and you do not have a "proper FE with buoyancy".
Trying to dismiss those pointing out the fact you have a pile of incoherent BS will not change that. Instead it just shows your dishonesty and desperation.