Nor will offering the very same thing, help you.
And I will keep objecting to your dishonest BS until you address the issue.
Again, Why do things fall?
How does the low pressure air above overcome the high pressure air below to push an object down?
If all there is is push, and it is only the air acting; then we consider an object surrounded by air, we have a higher pressure below than above. This means the air should push the object up.
It can NEVER push the object down, unless you find a way to reverse that pressure gradient, such as by putting it in a tube with one end sealed; or throw the object at a high velocity, or generate a high velocity wind. But all of these works just as well going up or down.
So you have no explanation for how the air pushes objects down.
Again, the closest you get is by appealing to the mass of the object, as if the mass of the object is what is trying to go down, and all the air above does is help the mass overcome the resistance from the air below; and if there was no air, then the mass would simply fall.
But that would be admitting it is not the air.
Making lies up doesn't aid you in any way.
Yet you do it all the time.
I always state I never offer anything as factual if I can't physically prove it.
But you do, countless time.
You repeatedly assert that the RE is false, yet you can't physically prove that at all.
You repeatedly assert that there is no such thing as pull, yet you can't physically prove that at all either.
You don't say that is merely your opinion.
You state it as a fact.
And before you try that dishonest BS, that doesn't help you.
Unless you use a qualifier, if you make a claim about reality you are claiming it as a fact.
But all of this is just father demonstrating your dishonesty.
Your claim wasn't that you only claim as fact things which you can physically prove, it was this:
For me to believe something I do require proof. For me to accept something I require good evidence that could offer a distinct possibility of truth.
Yet you routinely believe things (or at least act like you do), without any proof at all.
You believe things without any evidence that offers any possibility of truth.
Your entire denpressure BS is based upon wishful thinking. It has no evidence to back it up at all, and is trivially refuted by mountains of evidence.
You just blindly assert it works with no reasoning or evidence at all.
On the other hand, people like yourself claim anything as factual based on merely appealing to authority.
No, not just authority.
Also appealing to evidence (including evidence you can obtain yourself) and logical reasoning.
2 things, all your delusional BS severely lack.
It's been answered and if you refuse to see the answer or do not accept my answer, then no problem...but do not pretend I didn't answer.
No, it hasn't.
You provided vague BS which directly avoids the problem.
Again, it is ultimately the same problem you faced right from the start.
How does the air magically push things down?
When you push an object up a hill (or lift an object up, etc), you have a greater force from below pushing up than you do from above pushing down.
When you push an object down a hill, you have a greater force from below resisting than you do from above helping.
This means it should be harder to push an object down than up.
But again, this is ultimately the same question you refuse to answer:
How does the low pressure air above overcome the higher pressure air below to push the object down?
You have no answer.
Because any answer would involve admitting it isn't the air.
Actually, pay some attention and absorb what I've been saying and then you won't need to ask the same question whilst pretending I never answered.
Just take some time to absorb.
Follow your own advice.
Actually pay attention to what we have been saying.
Then you wouldn't need to keep spouting the same non-answer.
Instead, you would recognise the issue and discard your BS.
It does not exist as any reality but it does make for a good story of fiction.
And here you go claiming things as facts.
Even saying it is not reality.
Yet you have NOTHING to support this blatant lie of yours.
You cannot provide any evidence to challenge the spinning globe, nor can you refute the evidence which supports it.
The cause to do so comes from being told fictional stories about what Earth is and what is beyond it.
So the cause for you to think Earth is flat comes not from any evidence that it is flat, but merely that you were told Earth is round and what that means for reality.
i.e. you can't handle Earth (and by extension you) being insignificant in the grand scheme of things?
I don't have to prove anything any more than you can offer proof against what I say
And we have.
Simple logical proof (even using your own words against you), to show your model is complete garabge.
Proof you cannot refute and need to continually flee from.
Once more, the pressure gradient of the atmosphere (any fluid in fact) and the known ways that air pressure interacts with objects, demonstrates beyond any sane doubt that the air pushes objects up, not down.
With that, your model is DOA.
You need to explain how the low pressure overcomes the higher pressure below to push an object down if you want any hope of your model working.
Until you actually address this issue, your garbage is disproven.
you cannot offer proof oif a spinning globe
We can, and have. There are mountains of it.
This includes plenty you can test yourself.
Such as going to a mountain and looking at how far away the horizon is as you ascend and how the angle of dip to the horizon changes as you ascend.
Observations of distant objects, especially as they go over the horizon or are viewed at different distances; with the bottom obscured.
Foucault's pendulum, or laser ring gyroscopes, including observations around the world.
The existence of 2 celestial poles, always 180 degrees apart, including how the angle of elevation of these poles change as you move around Earth.
How the sun and moon remain roughly the same angular size, with roughly the same face of the moon facing everyone regardless of where they are, yet appearing at different angles.
The constellations in the sky appearing the same regardless of where you are on Earth, but appearing at a different angle.
All of this points to a round Earth, with some also pointing to Earth rotating (rather than everything else rotating around us).
You would have to have nature itself conspiring against you to have all this otherwise.