It's up to each individual as to whether they want to try and understand denpressure from my side.
And it is up to you to produce a coherent model which could actually work to explain reality, and provide it to people.
You are yet to do that.
No it's not insulated by a vacuum.
Again, if you don't want to speak English, stop pretending to.
I did not say a PERFECT vacuum.
And regardless, you aren't helping yourself here.
You are just deflecting from your complete inability to explain reality.
It's simply a lower pressure of molecules under much less ability to transfer higher pressure, more agitated molecules through that lower pressure thermos cavity.
What metal cup?
The one above, which you just entirely ignored.
Yet again, you just play dumb to avoid the fact that your delusional BS is directly contradicted by reality.
Your pathetic deflections and pathetic assertions just demonstrate how dishonest and desperate you are.
Grow up, and try to actually address the issue.
Again, It is quite clear from these experiments that the atmosphere is NOT needed.
If you wish to claim otherwise, and not just be dismissed as a pathetic liar trying to con people into a pathetic fantasy, then you need to address these experiments.
It's all been explained. What you ignore of it is not my issue.
Repeating the same lie will not help you.
You have NEVER explained anything, because you can't.
Just look at this thread for how far you have run from a simple request to provide an experiment to prove your delusional BS.
You see it isn't just a plain black-and-white ideal with what you're trying to offer.
YOU are the one trying to offer black and white, by demanding the air is needed and lying by claiming that without it nothing works.
Every movement of molecules is work.
Again, if you don't want to speak English stop pretending to.
In English work is a quite specific thing, and it doesn't include every movement of molecules.
And it certainly is NOT heat.
I'm not falsely claiming it, I'm claiming it.
You ARE falsely claiming it, because it is false, and you are claiming it.
But again, you are using this BS claim to avoid the issue you were trying to argue, that the atmosphere is needed for everything.
Heat and work is irrelevant to that BS discussion of yours, as neither need the atmosphere.
It's never a by-product, it is always a product.
And more delusional BS.
If that was the case we would be doing whatever we can to increase heat, instead of decreasing it to make devices more efficient.
And how is the transfer of heat dependent on a “gas”? So, what do you mean by atmosphere?
All molecules.
So you are saying that 1 kg block of lead is 1 kg of atmosphere. It doesn't displace that atmosphere, it IS that atmosphere?
No I'm not.
So you are saying your previous statement is a blatant lie? That NOT all molecules are the atmosphere?
I'm saying that every molecular makeup of any dense mass will always have porosity and that porosity is the atmospheric makeup.
You have repeated that delusional BS many times, but never justified it.
Space provides a fairy story. A fantasy.
No, you provide it, to escape from the harsh reality which includes space, which you clearly can't handle.
How does water heat the air?
Are you ever capable of actually responding to the issue? Or are you only capable of pathetic, dishonest deflections?
Again, the air pressure is higher inside.
Without gravity, the egg should be pushed up, and no longer create a seal.
Likewise, without a pulling force holding the glass together, it should disintegrate.
Your delusional BS fails to explain this simple experiment.
This relates back to the most parts of your delusional BS which you can't explain, why things go down at all, and how any solid matter holds itself together without pulling forces.
So care to get back to that and try explaining how your air magically pushes things in direct defiance of the known behaviour of gases by pushing from low pressure into high pressure?
As always, I do explain.
No, you don't. You NEVER explain. You just lie and claim to have explained.
Look at the above, what is your explanation for why the egg doesn't get pushed up? No where to be seen. Instead you just assert it rattles a bit.
What is your explanation for how the jar holds itself together? No where to be seen. Instead you just assert there can be no pulling force.
You NEVER explain, because you can't explain, because your delusional BS cannot match reality.
Try being honest for once in your life and admitting that you haven't explained it and actually try addressing the issues raised.