What comes first?
The force causes the mass to accelerate.
If I ignore air resistance then there's no experiment.
Sure there is.
A big part about making USEFUL models is that you need to determine when they apply, and not making them some complex they are useless to use.
This includes knowing what effects will be insignificant and can be ignored.
Of course there
No, there isn't.
But you refuse to accept this fact because it kills your delusional fantasy.
Again, if we remove gravity what we have is the air pressure above the object which is a LOWER PRESSURE than the air pressure below the object.
There is no way for this air to push the object down.
Your delusional garbage has no explanation for why things falls.
So your delusional garbage has no chance of killing gravity.
Gravity works, your garbage doesn't.
The atmosphere stacks to end up with higher (below) to lower (above) pressure from the floor up, based on that stacking system, which you can't grasp.
We understand that the atmosphere has a pressure gradient.
We also understand that this is caused by gravity.
What you refuse to understand is that you have no explanation for why it does this, nor how that low pressure air above the object magically pushes the object down.
No need. All you need is to be able to grasp explanations and you can't.
Perhaps because you continue to refuse to provide them.
We can go back to the simple case.
We have a ball in mid-air.
It has higher pressure air below and lower pressure air above.
How does this low pressure air above the ball push it down into the higher pressure below, overcoming that greater pressure?
Note - this explanation MUST explain how low pressure overcomes high pressure, one of the things you say is impossible.
It's not a lie.
It is a lie.
You continue to pretend that everyone other than you is a brainwashed fool that just blindly accepts whatever BS they have been told and that they know nothing at all.
You do this to entirely dismiss arguments they make because you cannot refute them.
Not for you because I know you have no ability nor wish to do so...but for those who want to, which don't include frenzied global Earthers like yourself and Jackie and co.
And another pathetic lie.
Again, the issue is not if we want to understand or not.
It is if you are capable of explaining with your delusional fantasy.
You are not capable. That is why you resort to these cheap insults.
Do you think wind forces could offer up a scale imbalance to offer up a reading of less or even more of your mass on that plate?
Yes, which is why accurate balances are enclosed to stop as much wind as possible.
But notice how this entirely fails to address the issue.
If you need to rely upon the wind to explain why things fall, then you need the wind pushing things down.
This downwards force would then be based upon the wind, and people would be trivially blown around by the wind.
You know what you are saying is BS which doesn't address the issue, but you insist on offering up something as a trick.
No need for an equation. The only need is for people to get the gist of what's happening.
If you want your model to be accurate and useful, then you need equations.
Resorting to just getting the gist is what dishonest conmen do because they know their BS doesn't withstand scrutiny.