Modern cars absolutely confirm gravity

Because it doesn't matter.

You'll get to the top of the hill. The drag you perceive from the hill didn't keep you from climbing the first 3/4 of the hill, nor the last 1/4 of it.

That you're delusional is cute. Really it is.

But at the end of the day, there is nothing preventing you from going up a hill nor down it, nor back up.

If gravity were a thing, a big heavy truck shouldn't get up a hill. I've been on mountain driving. I'm afraid trucks can in fact get up hills.

Because it doesn't matter.

Again, you refuse to answer a simple question.
WHY?
Why is going up the hill harder?

If the distance along the hill doesn't matter, why bring it up at all?

If gravity were a thing, a big heavy truck shouldn't get up a hill. I've been on mountain driving. I'm afraid trucks can in fact get up hills.

Why?
Yet again you spout pure garbage with absolutely no justification at all.
Why do you insist on spouting such utter garbage, while refusing to justify any of the garbage you spout.

Without gravity, a truck should not need an engine to go up a hill.
If you get it rolling before the hill, it should continue to roll just as far up a hill as it would rolling down a hill.

But with gravity it is HARDER, not impossible, HARDER to go up a hill.
That is because instead of just fighting the rolling resistance of the tyres, etc, you now also need to fight gravity.

But gravity is not magic. If you apply enough force, you can overcome gravity.
So a truck can apply enough force to go up the hill.

You know nothing (Jon Snow)



It's not harder.  You're just pushing your car harder because you stupidly brake on downward incline and accelerate on the up incline.  This screws with the transmission. 
You step on the gas on the down incline, and ride the momentum for the up incline.  I have never had any problems with hills. You're just a bad driver. And you should feel bad.

You know nothing

Repeating the same crap wont help you.
Try actually answering rather than deflecting.

It's not harder.  You're just pushing your car harder because you stupidly brake on downward incline and accelerate on the up incline.

We aren't talking about going down an incline first.
We are talking about going up vs going level vs going down.

Regardless, this just further demonstrates the insanity of your position.
Without gravity there wouldn't be a need to break when going down hill. But instead you speed up if you don't break.
Likewise, without gravity, you shouldn't need to have gone down a hill to be able to coast up the next one.

Now stop with the pathetic deflections and try actually addressing the issue.

We can even make it simpler for you.
From a standing start:
If the car is on level ground it just sits there unless you provide it is on and trying to move forwards.
If the car is pointing down a hill, unless a break is applied, it will roll forwards, picking up speed.
If the car is pointing up a hill, unless a break is applied, it will roll backwards. In order to make it go up the hill a greater force needs to be applied than the case with level ground.

From a start at some velocity on a fixed incline.
If the car is level, you need to apply a small amount of force to keep the car going. If you put the car in neutral, and don't apply breaks, it will slowly come to a stop after a considerable distance.
If the car is going down a hill, without applying a break it will accelerate, going faster and faster.
If the car is going up a hill, without applying a break or the accelerator, it will very quickly come to a stop. You need to apply a significant force to keep it moving at the same speed.

Without gravity, there is no reason for any of this.

Now care to address the issue, or can you only spout more dishonest BS?

Interesting experiment that shows adding weight to a bicyclist makes it harder to bike up hill.

Anyway..  added





In a no gravity delusion, weight has no meaning.  Yet weight has real and measurable consequences for a bicyclist.