« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

what if I was using a telescope

  • 12 Replies
  • 1971 Views
?

BobDole

  • 114
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« on: January 26, 2007, 03:10:12 PM »
and I saw a man made satellite

how would I explain it with FE theory?
Logged
?

Tom Bishop

what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2007, 03:18:17 PM »
Lighter than air vehicles.
Logged
?

BobDole

  • 114
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2007, 03:21:25 PM »
Quote from: "Tom Bishop"
Lighter than air vehicles.


so wouldn't it continue to rise indefinitely?
Logged
?

Tom Bishop

what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2007, 03:23:08 PM »
For the same reasons blimps don't rise indefinitely.
Logged
?

BobDole

  • 114
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2007, 03:26:27 PM »
Quote from: "Tom Bishop"
For the same reasons blimps don't rise indefinitely.


human controls ensuring that proper density is maintained at the correct altitude?
Logged
?

Tom Bishop

what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2007, 03:27:14 PM »
Yes.
Logged
?

BobDole

  • 114
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2007, 03:28:58 PM »
Quote from: "Tom Bishop"
Yes.


where is the apparatus that regulates the density located on these lighter than air vehicles?
Logged
?

Ilikeroundthings

  • 15
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2007, 03:36:20 PM »
Quote from: "BobDole"
Quote from: "Tom Bishop"
For the same reasons blimps don't rise indefinitely.


human controls ensuring that proper density is maintained at the correct altitude?


Indeed. Unfortunately these controls happen to be heavier than air... :idea:
Logged
?

clockworkmonk

  • 50
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #8 on: January 26, 2007, 03:54:47 PM »
of course the controls are heavier than air, but the vehicle as a whole would not have to be.

look at the pods on blimps which are defiantly heavier than air, yet blimps fly.
Logged
quot;But I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them."
-Galileo Galilei
?

BobDole

  • 114
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #9 on: January 26, 2007, 03:55:25 PM »
Quote from: "clockworkmonk"
of course the controls are heavier than air, but the vehicle as a whole would not have to be.

look at the pods on blimps which are defiantly heavier than air, yet blimps fly.


then look at the huge sack full of lighter than air gasses that sits right above those pods
Logged
?

Tom Bishop

what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #10 on: January 26, 2007, 03:56:37 PM »
You can see the sacks with a personal telescope. I've seen them myself.
Logged
?

Ilikeroundthings

  • 15
  • +0/-0
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #11 on: January 26, 2007, 03:59:41 PM »
Quote from: "clockworkmonk"
of course the controls are heavier than air, but the vehicle as a whole would not have to be.

look at the pods on blimps which are defiantly heavier than air, yet blimps fly.


Blimps are normally controlled by people at very low altitudes. Satellites, on the other hand, are not.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
what if I was using a telescope
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2007, 07:41:01 PM »
Quote from: "Ilikeroundthings"


Blimps are normally controlled by people at very low altitudes. Satellites, on the other hand, are not.
They are not blimps.  They are stratellites.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »