Mass shootings at mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, kills 40

I wonder why the majority that they shouldn't publicize the views of Tarantino or whatever the fuck his name is are the people with similar views? Mighty suspicious, if you ask me.

Apparently he said "subscribe to Pewds" just before the shooting.

Felix Kjellberg has already released a statement. That dude just can't escape controversy.

Kevin Roose, a columnist for The New York Times, is spewing nonsense. 'Subscribe to PewDiePie' is a meme; it wasn't a way for the shooter "to inflame political tensions and to serve as a knowing nod to those who might be watching the gunman’s actions with approval."

I wonder why the majority that they shouldn't publicize the views of Tarantino or whatever the fuck his name is are the people with similar views? Mighty suspicious, if you ask me.

It's because they are scared as shit that people will notice that they hold the exact same views as this piece of shit. Only difference is that this guy took those views to their logical conclusion.

The problem is, we've already noticed. We see what they are doing. And always remember that these shitstains have names and adressess.

The problem is, we've already noticed. We see what they are doing. And always remember that these shitstains have names and adressess.

What does that mean?

Quote from: Pezevenk on March 15, 2019, 11:18:14 AM

Apparently he said "subscribe to Pewds" just before the shooting.

Felix Kjellberg has already released a statement. That dude just can't escape controversy.

Kevin Roose, a columnist for The New York Times, is spewing nonsense. 'Subscribe to PewDiePie' is a meme; it wasn't a way for the shooter "to inflame political tensions and to serve as a knowing nod to those who might be watching the gunman’s actions with approval."

It sure is a meme. But also all the white supremacists LOVE Pewdiepie. He's doing nothing to push them away from his fanbase and it kinda seems like he is actively trying to attract them.

LOL I keep seeing that everywhere. Ben Shapiro is awful. I'm not at all sure if this particular incident was influenced by him, but let's not forget he was the #1 Google search of the guy who shot up a mosque in Canada 2 years ago, the same guy who was admired by Tarrant and mentioned on his guns and his manifesto.

The reaction from the professional race baiters to this has been odd.

Not sure how much these people are to blame but I would think that if someone was quoting me and killing in my name then at the very least it's time to do some soul searching.

"Calling out the people, including me, who spread the ideas that lead to this is precisely what the killer wanted. Doing exactly nothing to prevent it from happening again is how you stick it up to him!".

WHAT THE FUCK Sargon literally says that the stuff in the manifesto actually has basis in reality so he is going to make a video discussing these points in the end! Worst room reader in the world.

Sargon is interesting because I don't know if he seriously believes all of these bad faith arguments or not. If he does then it's very disconcerting. It means that it's possible to trick people into ardently supporting talking points that are absurd.

Sargon is interesting because I don't know if he seriously believes all of these bad faith arguments or not. If he does then it's very disconcerting. It means that it's possible to trick people into ardently supporting talking points that are absurd.

Richard Spencer has expressed his satisfaction with exactly that.

Quote from: Crouton on March 17, 2019, 12:18:46 PM

Sargon is interesting because I don't know if he seriously believes all of these bad faith arguments or not. If he does then it's very disconcerting. It means that it's possible to trick people into ardently supporting talking points that are absurd.

Richard Spencer has expressed his satisfaction with exactly that.

fACts aNd LoGiC

But also he unironocally goes by the handle Sargon of Akkad... And Richard Spencer has a daughter who sends him bikini photos. Can we switch to a new reality yet?

And Richard Spencer has a daughter who sends him bikini photos.

Can we just end this world?

Just to put in context how shitty and tone deaf what Sargon is doing is:

It sure is a meme. But also all the white supremacists LOVE Pewdiepie. He's doing nothing to push them away from his fanbase and it kinda seems like he is actively trying to attract them.

Nothing I've noticed seems to support this claim.

Quote from: Pezevenk on March 17, 2019, 03:44:21 AM

It sure is a meme. But also all the white supremacists LOVE Pewdiepie. He's doing nothing to push them away from his fanbase and it kinda seems like he is actively trying to attract them.

Nothing I've noticed seems to support this claim.

It started with him making holocaust jokes and coming under fire for them, all the white supremacist freaks came in his defence. Then he said nigger on stream, twice. He made a video with Ben Shapiro and he also follows a bunch of far right nut jobs and race biters on Twitter, like Stefan Molyneux, Lauren Southern and Sargon of Akkkad. If you go on 4chin or one of the other lame knockoffs you'll see a bunch of neckbeards memeing about him. They think he is hiding his power level. In fact we had our very own lame PewDiePie loving neo nazi here, on this forum saying the same shit. The comments in some of his videos are pretty atrocious as well.

In fact we had our very own lame PewDiePie loving neo nazi here, on this forum saying the same shit. The comments in some of his videos are pretty atrocious as well.

Yep.

The comments in some of his videos are pretty atrocious as well.

To be fair, most youtube comments are shit.

Quote from: Pezevenk on March 18, 2019, 12:07:23 AM

The comments in some of his videos are pretty atrocious as well.

To be fair, most youtube comments are shit.

Those comments are a competition.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/world/oceania/he-will-when-i-speak-be-nameless-jacinda-ardern-refuses-to-identify-accused-mosque-gunman-20190319-p515gk.html

At least the New Zealand PM gets it and refuses to ever name the attacker again and does not believe his hate filled manifesto should ever make for public viewing.

I know I'm accused of being a far right twit on here but I have never even heard of some of the people mentioned here like Ben Shapiro or Sargon of Akkad. Never seen anything by this PewPew character either. I knew of 4chan but never logged to it and didn't know there was an 8chan until now. Truth be told I don't give a rats arse about or follow anyone on social media. Hell, I don't even use it anymore.

I still believe the best thing the media can do is stop posting about this gunman. He made a 'white power' salute in court - so what does the media do? Takes a photo and posts it to millions. Stop giving him an audience. It gives him power.

I have seen titles of another dozen it seems articles about his childhood. FFS let the guy rot. The media should stop posting anything to do with his bullshit manifesto and only post the basics in relation to his trial. Everything else serves and empowers this dickhead.

This guy may try to use the court as a platform for his views. They may even forego charging him with terrorism and make it a simple murder case. This is sad.

It's such an open and shut case of terrorism. Just close the court to the public. What this guy wants to say and his defence of his actions are not on the public interest. The only thing in the public interest now is to hear that he will be locked up for life in solitary confinement without parole.

Then after that, the media should not speak his name or about his whinging (like that Norway terrorist) again.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/world/oceania/he-will-when-i-speak-be-nameless-jacinda-ardern-refuses-to-identify-accused-mosque-gunman-20190319-p515gk.html

At least the New Zealand PM gets it and refuses to ever name the attacker again and does not believe his hate filled manifesto should ever make for public viewing.

I know I'm accused of being a far right twit on here but I have never even heard of some of the people mentioned here like Ben Shapiro or Sargon of Akkad. Never seen anything by this PewPew character either. I knew of 4chan but never logged to it and didn't know there was an 8chan until now. Truth be told I don't give a rats arse about or follow anyone on social media. Hell, I don't even use it anymore.

I still believe the best thing the media can do is stop posting about this gunman. He made a 'white power' salute in court - so what does the media do? Takes a photo and posts it to millions. Stop giving him an audience. It gives him power.

I have seen titles of another dozen it seems articles about his childhood. FFS let the guy rot. The media should stop posting anything to do with his bullshit manifesto and only post the basics in relation to his trial. Everything else serves and empowers this dickhead.

This guy may try to use the court as a platform for his views. They may even forego charging him with terrorism and make it a simple murder case. This is sad.

It's such an open and shut case of terrorism. Just close the court to the public. What this guy wants to say and his defence of his actions are not on the public interest. The only thing in the public interest now is to hear that he will be locked up for life in solitary confinement without parole.

Then after that, the media should not speak his name or about his whinging (like that Norway terrorist) again.

The problem with supressing this shit, is that you are handing the control of the narrative over to those who support and/or inspired him. He named several people in his manifesto, and it's not an accident that those very same people are  now all over the internet saying "hey, let's bury this thing and never speak about it again". They are scared shitless that they will be rightfully implicated in radicalizing this guy. And they want to hide that from you.

Sweeping this filth under the rug isn't going to make it go away. It should be dragged into the sunlight to get trampled to death.

Quote from: Symptom on March 16, 2019, 10:05:38 PM

The problem is, we've already noticed. We see what they are doing. And always remember that these shitstains have names and adressess.

What does that mean?

I'm sure you can figure it out.

I found this an interesting glimpse of the ideology that drives the right extremist views.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/03/22/warped-history-that-fuels-right-wing-terrorism/?utm_term=.db98908ee4b8

The clash of cultures is co-incidentally the very thing that ISIS seeks to achieve.   

I think it's funny that the extreme views from both ends of the spectrum coincide...   A global shoot out,  cultural warfare on a global scale.

I think some online games terrorizing people. I mean, manipulation in online games based on people shooting at each other can encourage people to really kill other people. they can make them think of it as an ordinary thing. If you remember, a lot of people have committed suicide because of the blue whale game. Then it has been forbid in entire world. this is perhaps a different version of it. Think like that. if this person really has an atmosphere in his own game world, for example, if he breaks into the mosque and knows the inside of the mosque, he can really try to think about how easy it is.

Online games for provocations seem appropriate. For example, in an online game in Tehran, if the players continue to enter the church and kill the people inside, it can affect their subconscious. I think that provocative changes in games have been used by intelligence organizations for some time. and I think someone is deliberately doing this to trigger a Muslim-Christian conflict. as to its general tendency in Turkish public that it has planned by the US as a response to the UK's exit from the brexit. But I don't agree the public opinion in Turkey.

In my opinion, I think China is behind this. The conflicts between Muslims and Christians are only in the interests of China. With the fall of the boeing planes, the Muslim-Christian conflict, which could be a more serious problem for the United States, may have been planned as another version of the conflict between the global damage to the interests of the United States and the huawai problem and taxes. China has no such problem as religion.

I think some online games terrorizing people. I mean, manipulation in online games based on people shooting at each other can encourage people to really kill other people. they can make them think of it as an ordinary thing. If you remember, a lot of people have committed suicide because of the blue whale game. Then it has been forbid in entire world. this is perhaps a different version of it. Think like that. if this person really has an atmosphere in his own game world, for example, if he breaks into the mosque and knows the inside of the mosque, he can really try to think about how easy it is.

Online games for provocations seem appropriate. For example, in an online game in Tehran, if the players continue to enter the church and kill the people inside, it can affect their subconscious. I think that provocative changes in games have been used by intelligence organizations for some time. and I think someone is deliberately doing this to trigger a Muslim-Christian conflict. as to its general tendency in Turkish public that it has planned by the US as a response to the UK's exit from the brexit. But I don't agree the public opinion in Turkey.

In my opinion, I think China is behind this. The conflicts between Muslims and Christians are only in the interests of China. With the fall of the boeing planes, the Muslim-Christian conflict, which could be a more serious problem for the United States, may have been planned as another version of the conflict between the global damage to the interests of the United States and the huawai problem and taxes. China has no such problem as religion.

Hey, you forgot to do the "I am a Turk and I write really shitty English" thing.

We have many more racists here like falseprophet, rabinoz, NSS, scg and many others may be dangereous for muslims.