You have officially lost all credibility, Round.
That never stopped anyone here.
Actually Gravity is indeed just a theory, I asked you to explain it and you couldn't. You can give a long winded theory with some basic ideas supporting it but that isn't really explaining it now is it?
Gravity seems like some kind of life line for FEers, it's the only thing I ever hear from them.
You can use the theory of universal gravitation, or general relativity, or modern physics to make accurate predictions of gravitational phenomenons, and everything will always match.
Gravity CAN be explained, it already has been. Now, as for knowing, WHY gravity exists and does what it does, what would we gain from knowing that?
RE can predict most known phenomenons with 100% accuracy, reproduce them , or make smaller scaled models of them (again with close to 100% accuracy in the results) FE can't do this, it will never be able to do this (otherwise, it would actually be a theory) and I'm sure you'll agree that FE has many, many more unknowns than RE. So in that respect, the OP was correct.
Just because we don't believe that the earth has gravity means that no other object CAN have it.
1. I think he was refering to the fact that some FE will deny that gravity exists at all, and then turn around and tell you that the sun and/or moon have gravvitational fields.
2. Gravity is a property of all matter with mass, so if the sun has a gravitationnal field, then the earth and everything else in the universe does as well. Either everything does, or nothing does. The earth is made of matter just like everything else, so it's impossible to have some planets with it, and some without, that is an illogical statment.
Well right now RE has a theory of gravity that could, for all intents and purposes, be described as magical energy for all we know about it
That is not correct. Magic cannot be calculated and predicted and cannot be shown to be an observable phenomenon in nature. Gravity can, and is.
now I'm no physisist, and i probably spelled it wrong, but i think an explanation for gravity on earth could be caused by the spinning of earth combined with the pull on the planet by the sun. So we are flinging toward the sun and the earth is also spinning.
Actually, all objects with mass posses a gravitational field that increases in intensity as the mass increases. The more massive the object, the greater the field, earth is several times more masive than you, so you "stick" to it. You also have your own gravitational field, but we puny humans don't generate a field of any significance.
Even in RE, that has frak all to do with how gravity works.
That is correct, even though I don't know what frak means. But note the earth's rotation DOES affect the earth's gravitational pull.
Just because we don't believe that the earth has the ability to naturally attract other objects means that no other object CAN have it.
Like I explained earlier, the very notion of gravity makes this scenario impossible. You just said yourself that it was due to object's mass, so you should understand that. Are you saying the earth has no mass?
Held in place by the ice wall?
You'll agree that there is no ice wall covering the sky.
The sun is not rotating, the air mass that is heated directly below it is. As the sun moves in its orbit, it imparts a spin, in oppostite directions, on either side of its orbit.
How does that work? According to your explanation, the Coriolis force would vary depending on temperature and cloud cover, and would be inexistant at night. Since we know that this does not happen, your explanation is invalid. Not to mention that people in the southern part of north america would notice that clouds are always moving from east to west when facing south, which is also not the case.
They aren't shadows, they are imperfections in the light - in the same way that a bulb with black paint on it would have dark areas
I fail to see how a bulb with black paint on it qualifies as an imperfection of the light. In any case, it's easily disproven by looking at the moon with a telescope. That explanation wasn't even backed up by anything.
The laws of physics which don't make sense?
Gravity?
What's your point? That doesn't say anything.
because the electomagnetic force of the water dissipates the ships hull, making is essentially invisable to the untrained eye
There is NO dicipation. The hull isn't blurry or faded, you just can't see it AT ALL. Would you care to explain how exactly that phenomenon works and what causes it? And what electromagnetic force are you talking about here? As far as I know, water isn't radioactive. And if it's merely invisible to the "untrained eye" why doesn't the hull become visible if you take a picture?