Ask Heiwa Anything

Quote from: Heiwa on December 03, 2017, 10:25:32 PM

Quote from: rabinoz on December 03, 2017, 04:23:46 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 02, 2017, 12:24:44 PM

If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.

From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.

No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges -  .

It is not possible to win one of your self-judged challenges due to some condition of yours. I think it's Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Actually, it's more likely Dunning-Kruger.

Quote from: Boots on December 03, 2017, 11:09:10 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 03, 2017, 10:25:32 PM

Quote from: rabinoz on December 03, 2017, 04:23:46 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 02, 2017, 12:24:44 PM

If you can read with a blindfold on, any government will shoot you at once on sight. Suggest you read my website without blindfold. Have a nice time.

From what I have read of your reputation, a tinfoil hat might be more effective.

No, you are just jealous that you cannot win any of my €1M Challenges -  .

It is not possible to win one of your self-judged challenges due to some condition of yours. I think it's Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Actually, it's more likely Dunning-Kruger.

It seems that according Dunning–Kruger a person of high ability like me tend to underestimate my relative competence and erroneously presume that tasks that are easy for me to perform are also easy for other people to perform. It is not my case. I just use critical thinking when looking at various matters and suggest other people to do the same. Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.

Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.

Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?

Quote from: Heiwa on December 04, 2017, 10:24:24 PM

Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.

Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?

Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.

I want to ask this one:

Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?

Quote from: Boots on December 05, 2017, 12:57:35 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 04, 2017, 10:24:24 PM

Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.

Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?

Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.

If they just accept what you say are they not stupid twerps?

It seems that according Dunning–Kruger a person of high ability like me tend to underestimate my relative competence and erroneously presume that tasks that are easy for me to perform are also easy for other people to perform.

It also says that stupid people like you don't realize just how stupid they really are.

Quote from: Denspressure on November 23, 2017, 02:07:43 PM

Quote from: AltSpace on November 21, 2017, 10:11:48 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on October 18, 2017, 11:30:11 PM

Thanks for asking. Please study:
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm

Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm

Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
Are you a planarist?

I have read the Apollo focused ones.

They are utter bonkers.

Lies, misinformation and plain misunderstanding of the program and basic aspects of it, like lightning and photography.

I and  others have pointed out many flaws. He has yet to change anything.

Why would I change anything? Do you really believe the fairy tales that human beings can travel in the vacuum of space by firing rockets at high speeds and finally land on Earth using a parachute? ROTFL! But it is a good Hollywood show!

It is like the fairy tales of US nuclear weapons. They are just invented by some science fiction writers 1942/5 with assistance of Hollywood.

But I agree that it is very easy to fool Americans using propaganda and media, e.g. that 19 Arabs destroyed the WTC of NY and the Pentagon of DC on 911 using air planes.

I have corrected you multiple times already. You said you would change it if something was wrong on your website, but have yet to do so.

Quote from: Heiwa on November 23, 2017, 10:38:38 PM

Quote from: Denspressure on November 23, 2017, 02:07:43 PM

Quote from: AltSpace on November 21, 2017, 10:11:48 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on October 18, 2017, 11:30:11 PM

Thanks for asking. Please study:
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravelw2.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel1.htm
http://heiwaco.com/moontravel2.htm

Only twerps believe in human space travel. Prove me wrong and collect €1M!
http://heiwaco.com/chall2.htm

Wow, a lot in there, a good resource for space criticism.
Are you a planarist?

I have read the Apollo focused ones.

They are utter bonkers.

Lies, misinformation and plain misunderstanding of the program and basic aspects of it, like lightning and photography.

I and  others have pointed out many flaws. He has yet to change anything.

Why would I change anything? Do you really believe the fairy tales that human beings can travel in the vacuum of space by firing rockets at high speeds and finally land on Earth using a parachute? ROTFL! But it is a good Hollywood show!

It is like the fairy tales of US nuclear weapons. They are just invented by some science fiction writers 1942/5 with assistance of Hollywood.

But I agree that it is very easy to fool Americans using propaganda and media, e.g. that 19 Arabs destroyed the WTC of NY and the Pentagon of DC on 911 using air planes.

I have corrected you multiple times already. You said you would change it if something was wrong on your website, but have yet to do so.

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 08:07:20 PM

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx

Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.

So no need to change my website.

In a nuclear weapon of mass destruction there is no moderation of any kind, we are told, and the neutrons just fly away at the speed of light and 'fission' a lump of solid uranium. Only twerps like you - markjo - believes it.

You are so fucking stupid.

What about my question, sir?

Quote from: markjo on December 06, 2017, 08:39:24 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 08:07:20 PM

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx

Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.

So no need to change my website.

Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons.  Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons.  You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 09:53:09 PM

Quote from: markjo on December 06, 2017, 08:39:24 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 08:07:20 PM

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx

Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.

So no need to change my website.

Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons.  Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons.  You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.

OK, show me how to improve my website.  Show me what is wrong. And what you want to change. And how it should look.

Quote from: markjo on December 07, 2017, 06:31:32 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 09:53:09 PM

Quote from: markjo on December 06, 2017, 08:39:24 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 08:07:20 PM

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx

Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.

So no need to change my website.

Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons.  Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons.  You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.

OK, show me how to improve my website.  Show me what is wrong. And what you want to change. And how it should look.

I just told you that your site is wrong about fast fission, so that's one thing.  Another thing would be to break the pages into a number of smaller, easier to digest pages that address specific points, rather one humongous page that rambles on and on and just dismisses everything as propaganda.  Perhaps you should consult a professional web site designer for specific layout suggestions.

Quote from: Heiwa on December 07, 2017, 11:01:13 AM

Quote from: markjo on December 07, 2017, 06:31:32 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 09:53:09 PM

Quote from: markjo on December 06, 2017, 08:39:24 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 08:07:20 PM

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx

Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.

So no need to change my website.

Yes, you do need to change your web site because cooling a reactor is not the same as moderating the neutrons.  Sodium is used because it can act as a coolant without slowing the fast neutrons.  You only think it's nonsense because you don't understand it and you won't change your site because you will never admit to being wrong about anything.

OK, show me how to improve my website.  Show me what is wrong. And what you want to change. And how it should look.

I just told you that your site is wrong about fast fission, so that's one thing.  Another thing would be to break the pages into a number of smaller, easier to digest pages that address specific points, rather one humongous page that rambles on and on and just dismisses everything as propaganda.  Perhaps you should consult a professional web site designer for specific layout suggestions.

It seems you haven't visited my popular website about nuclear bombs.
Fission is clearly defined/described. There is only one type of fission and it is moderated. Anything else is propaganda and pseudoscience.
My website is already broken down into smaller, easier to digest sections. There is a summary and an index at the beginning, etc, etc. You should really study it.

Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?


https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv

Does it burn?

Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?


https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv

Does it burn?

No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
It is just a late, stupid part of the NASA space show that I describe at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .  Only twerps believe that science fiction is possible in reality.
It isn't.

Quote from: sokarul on December 16, 2017, 11:41:50 PM

Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?


https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv

Does it burn?

No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
It is just a late, stupid part of the NASA space show that I describe at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .  Only twerps believe that science fiction is possible in reality.
It isn't.

And only a piss poor engineers think that it's impossible to land a first stage booster after it's already been done 20 times.

I want to ask this one:

Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?

What about my question, sir?

Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse

I would also like an answer to bhotd's question.

Quote from: Heiwa on December 17, 2017, 02:59:28 AM

Quote from: sokarul on December 16, 2017, 11:41:50 PM

Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?


https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv

Does it burn?

No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
It is just a late, stupid part of the NASA space show that I describe at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .  Only twerps believe that science fiction is possible in reality.
It isn't.

And only a piss poor engineers think that it's impossible to land a first stage booster after it's already been done 20 times.

Well, it - the footage of it - was fakery every time. Just drop anything from say 1 000 or 10 000 m altitude and calculate the energy required to stop the drop so that anything lands at zero speed at 0 m altitude. Then explain how to get that energy into anything.

Quote from: Heiwa on December 05, 2017, 05:33:53 AM

Quote from: Boots on December 05, 2017, 12:57:35 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 04, 2017, 10:24:24 PM

Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.

Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?

Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.

If they just accept what you say are they not stupid twerps?

No. People accepting what I say are intelligent and nice.

Quote from: Boots on December 05, 2017, 06:01:22 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 05, 2017, 05:33:53 AM

Quote from: Boots on December 05, 2017, 12:57:35 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 04, 2017, 10:24:24 PM

Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.

Do you think this is why no one listens to you? Because they're not stupid?

Plenty people listen to and agree with me and they are not stupid.

If they just accept what you say are they not stupid twerps?

No. People accepting what I say are intelligent and nice.

Hmm. You can't seem to make up your mind:

Just accepting what other people say is in my view stupid. Only twerps do it.

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 05, 2017, 05:38:38 AM

I want to ask this one:

Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 06, 2017, 10:13:39 PM

What about my question, sir?

Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse

Maybe you missed this again Heiwa. We impore you to share your wisdom and give us your knowledge

Here is a bigger pod to get your attention

Quote from: Shifter on December 17, 2017, 01:13:45 PM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 05, 2017, 05:38:38 AM

I want to ask this one:

Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 06, 2017, 10:13:39 PM

What about my question, sir?

Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse

Maybe you missed this again Heiwa. We impore you to share your wisdom and give us your knowledge

Here is a bigger pod to get your attention

Thanks. I was out Christmas shopping and had a bad Japanese lunch during it, but otherwise I am top 100% fit.
What is your question?

Quote from: markjo on December 17, 2017, 09:44:09 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 17, 2017, 02:59:28 AM

Quote from: sokarul on December 16, 2017, 11:41:50 PM

Heiwa, what does it feel like to watch a video that destroys everything you pretend to believe in?


https://i.imgur.com/2RCnYHi.gifv

Does it burn?

No, the NASA video just shows something - a rocket? - dropping from sky by gravity that manages to stop by itself ... and land ... vertically ... at zero speed ... on land ... on Earth.
It is just a late, stupid part of the NASA space show that I describe at http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm .  Only twerps believe that science fiction is possible in reality.
It isn't.

And only a piss poor engineers think that it's impossible to land a first stage booster after it's already been done 20 times.

Well, it - the footage of it - was fakery every time. Just drop anything from say 1 000 or 10 000 m altitude and calculate the energy required to stop the drop so that anything lands at zero speed at 0 m altitude. Then explain how to get that energy into anything.

Like I said, only a piss poor engineer would think that.  Thanks for proving my point.  A good engineer would wonder how thay did it for real instead of wondering how they faked it.

Quote from: Shifter on December 17, 2017, 10:29:43 PM

Quote from: Shifter on December 17, 2017, 01:13:45 PM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 05, 2017, 05:38:38 AM

I want to ask this one:

Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 06, 2017, 10:13:39 PM

What about my question, sir?

Hi Heiwa, it appears you are very popular and your wisdom is in high demand. I think this is a very good question and we would all like you to tell us your thoughts. Here is some more Nespresso pods to drink from as we converse

Maybe you missed this again Heiwa. We impore you to share your wisdom and give us your knowledge

Here is a bigger pod to get your attention

Thanks. I was out Christmas shopping and had a bad Japanese lunch during it, but otherwise I am top 100% fit.
What is your question?

Here, let me help you out old fella:

I want to ask this one:

Why do they do that? I mean, if physics, geography, chemistry, history, biology, and everything else lies; (that I believe on); with this project who and what is it aimed at?

Quote from: markjo on December 06, 2017, 08:39:24 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on December 06, 2017, 08:07:20 PM

I must have missed your suggested corrections so please repeat them and I will see if they can improve my website.

For starters, you can change the part where you keep saying that nuclear fission can only happen with moderated slow neutrons because you have already acknowledged that unmoderated fast neutron fission reactors are real.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx

Well, even in an experimental 'fast' neutron fission reactor the process is moderated one way or other to prevent the whole thing to melt, i.e. using liquid sodium to cool it down and remote the heat (energy). And the 'fast' neutrons are just a little faster than the 'slow' neutrons. But liquid sodium is not easy to handle. So the whole thing about 'fast' neutrons is nonsense.

So no need to change my website.

In a nuclear weapon of mass destruction there is no moderation of any kind, we are told, and the neutrons just fly away at the speed of light and 'fission' a lump of solid uranium. Only twerps like you - markjo - believes it.

You keep showing how much you don't understand about nuclear reactions.  Moderation is the process of reducing neutron energies so the fuel will capture them and fission.  The fuel in fast fission reactors don't need to have the neutron energies reduced and therefore are NOT moderated.  You clearly don't understand what moderation is or how control rods control the reaction rates...thus the reason they're called "control" rods.  These concepts are lost on you which is just another reason in a long line of reasons showing you have no idea what you're talking about.

You really should learn how nuclear reactions work before you make unfounded claims as to what is real and what isn't.

Mike