Blah, blah, blah blah
all talk and no math.
You mean the math I did to show how adding a leap second doesn't actually indicate Earth is slowing down and instead just indicates a day is actually slightly longer than 86400 seconds on average?
Or do you mean the math I did to show how observations of Polaris and the sun completely refute the idea of a flat Earth?
Or the math I did to show that a photon having some finite travel limit would violate the first law of thermodynamics?
Or the math I did to show that an experiment where you film yourself jumping using an iPhone has far too great an error to conclude what they claimed?
Should I go on?
You seem to be the one that is all talk and no math.
You keep bitching and moaning claiming that heat transfers disproves a spinning atmosphere, but you are yet to show this to be the case.
Where is your math to support it?
can't draw a Free Body Diagram that shows the forces that keep the airplane in sync with a spinning Earth.
I had no need to draw one. I explained it without one and I used the one you already provided (it already had the force on it).
Then you tell me that the atmosphere hold the plane in sync, but when asked for a Convection Heat Transfer Model of a spinning radiating earth which would show the height fo the velocity that the sphere would affect, would not provide anything.
Yes, and I explained why it wasn't needed. And you are yet to provide the model either, yet you keep appealing to it.
When confronted with old scientific book which states that the Moon accelerates and asked your to be shown in the heliocentric model, did not provide any model.
Yes, which states, with no real backing. I'd need to investigate it more.
When confronted about the leap second and that the earth is slowing down, your response was that I write gibberish.
No, my response was to completely disprove your claims.
This will be the last post in this thread for today.
Why not make it your last post forever? You never add anything of substance.