Incorrect I suggest you watch the video 
Michaelson Morley proved the Earth to be stationary and Georges Sagnac proved there is an aether which contradicts Einsteins bollocks these are the facts.
You religious types just can't except the results of real repeatable science.
As far as the
Heliocentric Globe is concerned, I'm not one of your
religious types, I base my conclusions on evidence.
So I can accept the correct, consistent interpretation of well performed experiments, such as the
Michelson-Morely experiment and the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment.
I suggest that you read some of what Michelson himself said,
though I guess that you will claim that your High Priests in the Temple of YouTube know more than Michelson himself.
This is with reference to the
Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment to measure the earth's rotation using the
Sagnac Effect, but is very relevant.
As mentioned above, as early as 1904 Michelson had proposed using such a device to measure the rotation of the earth, but he hadn't pursued the idea, since measurements of absolute rotation are fairly commonplace (e.g. Focault’s pendulum). Nevertheless, he (along with Gale) agreed to perform the experiment in 1925 (at considerable cost) at the urging of "relativists", who wished him to verify the shift of 236/1000 of a fringe predicted by special relativity. This was intended mainly to refute the theory of an ether fully dragged around with the spinning earth, as well as the only physically plausible ballistic theory of light propagation, both of which predict zero phase shift (for a circular device). Michelson was not enthusiastic, since classical optics on the assumption of a stationary ether predicted exactly the same shift does special relativity (as explained above). He said,
"We will undertake this, although my conviction is strong that we shall prove only that
the earth rotates on its axis, a conclusion which I think we may be said to be sure of already."
As Harvey lime wrote in his biographical sketch of Michelson, "The experiment, performed on the prairies west of Chicago, showed a displacement of 230/1000, in very close agreement with the prediction. The rotation of the Earth received another independent proof, the theory of relativity another verification. But neither fact had much significance." Michelson himself wrote that "this result may be considered as an additional evidence in favor of relativity - or equally as evidence of a stationary ether".
From Math Pages, 2.7 The Sagnac Effect
Note that Michelson himself claims that the
Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment is
"an additional evidence in favor of relativity - or equally as evidence of a stationary ether".
But note that the
Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment was evidence that there was no ether, that the ether moved with the earth or that the earth was stationary.
So the
Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment shows that the earth rotates, that is the
earth not stationary.But the
Michelson-Morely experiment shows that either there is no ether or that the
earth is stationary.
The only consistent conclusion is that the earth rotates and that there is no ether.
I don't care what your
High Priests in the Temple of YouTube claim
if you look to Michelson, Morely or Gale for support or you will fall flat on your face!While
Einstein did not base his theories on the
Michelson-Morely experiment, it does give a good confirmation of SR.
The
Michelson-Morely experiment did not have enough resolution to give conclusive evidence, but modern experiments, leave no doubt.
Read more in
Michelson–Morley experiment, Subsequent experiments.
It is becoming obvious that you have no real understanding of what you are talking about and you simply
parrot the words of your
High Priests on YouTube.
Just remember that the Heliocentric Globe is well proven.