Air Pressure vs Gravity

  • 1933 Replies
  • 345286 Views
?

Badxtoss

  • 3268
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1410 on: January 21, 2017, 08:20:41 AM »
The dishes are directed to the sky, as that is where the signal appears to come from. Reflected by the ionosphere and sent by satellite towers all over the Earth.
The dishes are directed at a very specific point in the sky.  I don't believe ionospheric reflection is stable enough to carry the kind of data we are talking about.

*

Gaia_Redonda

  • 652
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1411 on: January 21, 2017, 08:24:36 AM »
The dishes are directed to the sky, as that is where the signal appears to come from. Reflected by the ionosphere and sent by satellite towers all over the Earth.
The dishes are directed at a very specific point in the sky.  I don't believe ionospheric reflection is stable enough to carry the kind of data we are talking about.
More stable than a space thingie in the presence of ridiculous amounts of radiation, an extreme +300 and -270 C temperature environment at the same time, without maintenance "hanging" in an impossible location that cannot exist anyway because the centre of the Earth is not the centre of gravity.
I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses - Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)

?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1412 on: January 21, 2017, 09:47:47 AM »
The dishes are directed to the sky, as that is where the signal appears to come from. Reflected by the ionosphere and sent by satellite towers all over the Earth.
The dishes are directed at a very specific point in the sky.  I don't believe ionospheric reflection is stable enough to carry the kind of data we are talking about.
More stable than a space thingie in the presence of ridiculous amounts of radiation, an extreme +300 and -270 C temperature environment at the same time, without maintenance "hanging" in an impossible location that cannot exist anyway because the centre of the Earth is not the centre of gravity.
Non-understanding is not proof of non-existence.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1413 on: January 21, 2017, 12:41:25 PM »
The dishes are directed to the sky, as that is where the signal appears to come from. Reflected by the ionosphere and sent by satellite towers all over the Earth.
  • The ionosphere does not reflect significant microwave signals. Numerous references for this!

  • The ionosphere is not high enough
    Quote
    The ionosphere is a shell of electrons and electrically charged atoms and molecules that surrounds the Earth, stretching from a height of about 50 km (31 mi) to more than 1,000 km (620 mi). It owes its existence primarily to ultraviolet radiation from the Sun.
I prefer to believe facts!

Maybe the "Earth Scientist" should stick to things the "Earth Scientist" can understand.


?

Woody

  • 1144
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1414 on: January 21, 2017, 12:53:23 PM »
Having been in long range surveillance and long range communication being a very important part of the job I can say from practical experience using the ionosphere for something like sat TV is not reliable unless the dishes need to be adjusted based on conditions and/or frequencies changed. 

We used UHF, VHF and HF frequencies based on conditions, distance and data that needed to be sent.

Also every where I have been even in remote deserts and in the middle of the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans GPS worked.  No towers in sight and none seen during the journey until arriving at land or populated areas. 

The only issues I have had were in the Panama jungle where the canopy could make it tough to receive satellite signals.  If a went to an open area like a river the GPS would reliably work again and not have any trouble giving me a fix.

*

Gumby

  • 828
  • +0/-0
  • I don't exist.
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1415 on: January 21, 2017, 12:56:36 PM »
We can and do calculate the gravitational attraction between a satellite and earth and between spacecraft and other planets.
You get around all this sort of thing by simply denying anything that you can't understand.

Satellites and other space thingies don't exist, only in Hollywood. They go against gravity anyway, so even theoretically make no sense.

They are not needed to understand the principle of huge masses attracting other objects. Meteors, meteorites and orbits of moons (Jupiter, Saturn, our own Moon) are enough.

Quote
Have a nice day in Dreamland!

That would be Disney Dreamland for you, NASA shill.  :-*
What transmits the signals I receive with my satellite dish?  The angle agrees with published calculated information for a geostationary object transmitting over a large area.

Ionospheric reflection has been used before the "invention" of "satellites".

Yes, but the frequency is very different!!1!!!!1!

Nothing easier than just have a converter installed to adjust the frequencies.

Non-real time "satellite" data is gathered using high-flying planes.

Ionosphere does not reflect frequencies above HF. Sometimes tropospheric ducting may occur but only at VHF and it's not that frequent.
How dumb can you be?
I think MH370 was hijacked and the persons who did the hijacking were indeed out to prove a flat earth.

?

Woody

  • 1144
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1416 on: January 21, 2017, 01:22:21 PM »
The dishes are directed to the sky, as that is where the signal appears to come from. Reflected by the ionosphere and sent by satellite towers all over the Earth.
The dishes are directed at a very specific point in the sky.  I don't believe ionospheric reflection is stable enough to carry the kind of data we are talking about.
More stable than a space thingie in the presence of ridiculous amounts of radiation, an extreme +300 and -270 C temperature environment at the same time, without maintenance "hanging" in an impossible location that cannot exist anyway because the centre of the Earth is not the centre of gravity.

Can you tell us why something like multiple layers of aluminized mylar with layers of dacron in-between would not work for insulation?

How about why heat exchangers and cold plates can not be used?

Why can a space craft traveling not be turned when needed to keep temps with-in operating ranges?

What is too cold or too hot for something like electronics to work?


?

Twerp

  • Gutter Sniper
  • Flat Earth Almost Believer
  • 6540
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1417 on: January 21, 2017, 03:27:22 PM »

We know you don't believe in space travel, satellites etc. There are several threads devoted to your topic, plus you are free to start another one any time.

What are you doing here? Are you lost? This thread is about air pressure vs. gravity.
“Heaven is being governed by Devil nowadays..” - Wise

?

Badxtoss

  • 3268
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1418 on: January 21, 2017, 07:53:28 PM »
The dishes are directed to the sky, as that is where the signal appears to come from. Reflected by the ionosphere and sent by satellite towers all over the Earth.
The dishes are directed at a very specific point in the sky.  I don't believe ionospheric reflection is stable enough to carry the kind of data we are talking about.
More stable than a space thingie in the presence of ridiculous amounts of radiation, an extreme +300 and -270 C temperature environment at the same time, without maintenance "hanging" in an impossible location that cannot exist anyway because the centre of the Earth is not the centre of gravity.
You didn't really address the issue of the ionosphere.  I think it's fairly limited what kind signals you can bounce off the ionosphere.  Also, how that work as a gps in very remote areas?

?

Twerp

  • Gutter Sniper
  • Flat Earth Almost Believer
  • 6540
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1419 on: January 22, 2017, 07:28:21 PM »

You are reliant on simply being told it and being told that the formulas are correct for it.

But that's my whole point. Your statement is completely false. I know this because I have personally verified that this formula gives the correct results.
Ok then tell me how the formula gives the correct results for gravity and how you're sure it's correct.

Because I have measured the distances with a rope and a tape measure.
So measuring things with a rope and tape measure shows us gravity, does it?
Poppycock.
I didn't have time to really respond to this post the other day.

Perhaps I am wrong but I sense a tone of mockery toward the simplicity of this method. Which kind of hurts, and leads me to believe that you are an impossible man to please. You mock and berate any theory/equation/method  that involves any amount of complexity whatsoever. You also berate the people who discovered these methods and anyone who believes in them. So I provide a nice simple equation that anyone can use, and a method of verification that can be done with tools from a lumber yard. If you aren't mocking us for complexity you're mocking us for being too simple.

Do you have wife? If so, here are some flowers for her:


“Heaven is being governed by Devil nowadays..” - Wise

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1420 on: January 22, 2017, 11:38:25 PM »

You are reliant on simply being told it and being told that the formulas are correct for it.

But that's my whole point. Your statement is completely false. I know this because I have personally verified that this formula gives the correct results.
Ok then tell me how the formula gives the correct results for gravity and how you're sure it's correct.

Because I have measured the distances with a rope and a tape measure.
So measuring things with a rope and tape measure shows us gravity, does it?
Poppycock.
I didn't have time to really respond to this post the other day.

Perhaps I am wrong but I sense a tone of mockery toward the simplicity of this method. Which kind of hurts, and leads me to believe that you are an impossible man to please. You mock and berate any theory/equation/method  that involves any amount of complexity whatsoever. You also berate the people who discovered these methods and anyone who believes in them. So I provide a nice simple equation that anyone can use, and a method of verification that can be done with tools from a lumber yard. If you aren't mocking us for complexity you're mocking us for being too simple.

Do you have wife? If so, here are some flowers for her:


Those flowers would brighten any woman's life but I don't have a wife. I'm a loner in my mother's basement. Ask your globalist friends.

Anyway, tell me about the rope and tape measure proof for gravity. That's all I was asking.

?

Lonegranger

  • 4083
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1421 on: January 23, 2017, 12:04:54 AM »
For you...
https://goo.gl/images/tg2Cwk

But you want proof of gravity...just jump out your third floor window.....ah sorry...you live in a basement!

Never mind, just jump off the top of your cage, but be careful climbing up?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1422 on: January 23, 2017, 02:12:46 AM »
For you...
https://goo.gl/images/tg2Cwk

But you want proof of gravity...just jump out your third floor window.....ah sorry...you live in a basement!

Never mind, just jump off the top of your cage, but be careful climbing up?
So jumping out of a window proves gravity.
Of all the scientific nonsense spewed out about gravity. It seems jump out of your window or drop a ball/object appears to be the concrete proof.

The rest is all. " engineers can't work without it."
"Oh, so how do engineers use it?"
"They just do, ok."


Anyone know what gravity actually is?

*

onebigmonkey

  • 1623
  • +0/-0
  • You. Yes you. Stand still laddie.
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1423 on: January 23, 2017, 02:18:24 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.
Facts won't do what I want them to.

We went from a round Earth to a round Moon: http://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/apollo.html

?

Twerp

  • Gutter Sniper
  • Flat Earth Almost Believer
  • 6540
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1424 on: January 23, 2017, 03:30:46 AM »
Anyway, tell me about the rope and tape measure proof for gravity. That's all I was asking.

Well it isn't a proof of gravity.

The equation does work as I have personally verified and you can too if you like.

That equation was derived from Newton's law of universal gravitation which was later advanced by Cavendish and others. This equation as well as the others can be used to accurately describe the real world. They are used to predict what will happen under specific circumstances and to calculate the necessary force/acceleration/support/etc. for countless applications. The fact that these equations work in the real world is the best evidence you are going to get. Unless...

Here is an idea for you. If you feel the need to know the root cause of gravitation so badly before you can believe in it, why don't you give up arguing with us about dens-pressure and go to work on figuring that out. If you discover the root cause of gravitation you will get into all the history books. It is a huge problem to solve but somebody needs to do it and I think maybe that should be you!

Whaddya think?
“Heaven is being governed by Devil nowadays..” - Wise

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1425 on: January 23, 2017, 05:27:36 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.
I can compress atmosphere to create higher and lower pressures that fit perfectly with the world we live in.
What can you do with gravity to show gravity working?

Before you come in and say things like, "drop a ball/object" or "mass attracts mass", try and show how it happens that literally shows gravity at work.


*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1426 on: January 23, 2017, 05:34:00 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.
I can compress atmosphere to create higher and lower pressures that fit perfectly with the world we live in.
What can you do with gravity to show gravity working?

Before you come in and say things like, "drop a ball/object" or "mass attracts mass", try and show how it happens that literally shows gravity at work.

Yes, but those higher and lower pressures still don't affect how things fall or weigh.

Literally showing gravity at work - Cavendish Experiment
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1427 on: January 23, 2017, 05:34:17 AM »
Anyway, tell me about the rope and tape measure proof for gravity. That's all I was asking.

Well it isn't a proof of gravity.

The equation does work as I have personally verified and you can too if you like.

That equation was derived from Newton's law of universal gravitation which was later advanced by Cavendish and others. This equation as well as the others can be used to accurately describe the real world. They are used to predict what will happen under specific circumstances and to calculate the necessary force/acceleration/support/etc. for countless applications. The fact that these equations work in the real world is the best evidence you are going to get. Unless...

Here is an idea for you. If you feel the need to know the root cause of gravitation so badly before you can believe in it, why don't you give up arguing with us about dens-pressure and go to work on figuring that out. If you discover the root cause of gravitation you will get into all the history books. It is a huge problem to solve but somebody needs to do it and I think maybe that should be you!

Whaddya think?
How about telling me what gravity is by showing me what it does that proves what it actually is.
I get the fact you don't know the root cause. I know this because there is no such thing as gravity.
Prove me wrong instead of harping back to my denspressure.

Air pressure vs gravity is the topic.
I've spent a lot of time arguing with a massive amount of you people and done my best to answer ALL of you. Even the one's hell bent on taking the piss and abusive one's.

Tell me about this gravity. Just convince me of it in the best way you can. Surely it can't be so hard to do, can it?

Or, are you simply following a theory for no other reason than you bought the story and won't let go of it until the following masses become the minority. Fair enough if that's the case but at least be honest and admit it.

If that's not the case and you are really in the know, then explain to me what gravity is.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1428 on: January 23, 2017, 05:36:57 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.
I can compress atmosphere to create higher and lower pressures that fit perfectly with the world we live in.
What can you do with gravity to show gravity working?

Before you come in and say things like, "drop a ball/object" or "mass attracts mass", try and show how it happens that literally shows gravity at work.

Yes, but those higher and lower pressures still don't affect how things fall or weigh.

Literally showing gravity at work - Cavendish Experiment
Can you set up a Cavendish experiment and show it to work?
If so then explain it to me how you would go about it.

As for my denpressure. I've more than explained it but you can't (or won't) understand it.

?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1429 on: January 23, 2017, 06:11:10 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.
I can compress atmosphere to create higher and lower pressures that fit perfectly with the world we live in.
What can you do with gravity to show gravity working?

Before you come in and say things like, "drop a ball/object" or "mass attracts mass", try and show how it happens that literally shows gravity at work.

Yes, but those higher and lower pressures still don't affect how things fall or weigh.

Literally showing gravity at work - Cavendish Experiment
Can you set up a Cavendish experiment and show it to work?
If so then explain it to me how you would go about it.

As for my denpressure. I've more than explained it but you can't (or won't) understand it.
It is known and proven that changes in atmospheric pressure or the density do not affect the weight or rate of fall of an object.

If you believe otherwise please provide some data from your tests.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45080
  • +87/-109
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1430 on: January 23, 2017, 06:17:34 AM »
As for my denpressure. I've more than explained it but you can't (or won't) understand it.
And we've "more than explained" why density and pressure don't work like you think they do, but you can't (or won't) accept it.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1431 on: January 23, 2017, 10:04:22 AM »
As for my denpressure. I've more than explained it but you can't (or won't) understand it.
And we've "more than explained" why density and pressure don't work like you think they do, but you can't (or won't) accept it.
You've told me it doesn't work like I believe it does. You certainly haven't shown me.
And also you've never explained what gravity is, except to say it just is.

?

IonSpen

  • 1209
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1432 on: January 23, 2017, 10:13:30 AM »
As for my denpressure. I've more than explained it but you can't (or won't) understand it.
And we've "more than explained" why density and pressure don't work like you think they do, but you can't (or won't) accept it.
You've told me it doesn't work like I believe it does. You certainly haven't shown me.
And also you've never explained what gravity is, except to say it just is.
You never explained magnetism other than to say it just is, am I wrong?

?

Badxtoss

  • 3268
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1433 on: January 23, 2017, 10:17:31 AM »
As for my denpressure. I've more than explained it but you can't (or won't) understand it.
And we've "more than explained" why density and pressure don't work like you think they do, but you can't (or won't) accept it.
You've told me it doesn't work like I believe it does. You certainly haven't shown me.
And also you've never explained what gravity is, except to say it just is.
Well in fairness you have never shown how pressure affects weight.  You have been through videos that it does not but you don't believe them.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1434 on: January 23, 2017, 10:23:30 AM »
As for my denpressure. I've more than explained it but you can't (or won't) understand it.
And we've "more than explained" why density and pressure don't work like you think they do, but you can't (or won't) accept it.
You've told me it doesn't work like I believe it does. You certainly haven't shown me.
And also you've never explained what gravity is, except to say it just is.
You never explained magnetism other than to say it just is, am I wrong?
Yes you're wrong.

?

Lonegranger

  • 4083
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1435 on: January 23, 2017, 10:46:19 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.
[/quote


I can compress atmosphere to create higher and lower pressures that fit perfectly with the world we live in.
What can you do with gravity to show gravity working?


Before you come in and say things like, "drop a ball/object" or "mass attracts mass", try and show how it happens that literally shows gravity at work.


No you can't. You can't compress anything. Where is your demonstration, video or any other evidence. The only thing you can produce lots off is hot air.

?

IonSpen

  • 1209
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1436 on: January 23, 2017, 10:49:30 AM »
Which brings up an interesting point. Scepti, how does denpressure explain magnetism? Could you answer this with clear, simple terms?
Magnetism is no different to how everything works. It's high versus low pressure.
the window clamp can give you a very good idea of how magnetism works. It's simply displaced atmosphere by an object.
As far as magnetism is concerned, it's trapped atmosphere within the structure of the object.

There's a reason why you can gain or lose magnetism due to heat or cold or actually hitting an object hard enough to release trapped atmosphere.

We live in an atmospheric whirlpool that is strongest at the centre and gradually weaker as it spans out in the circle of Earth.

What?
What are you going to do now, go into ridicule mode?
If you do, then explain what magnetism is from your own nut if you think you're clever.
This is you saying "it just is", nothing more. No evidence, proof, or anything else. Magnetism is trapped atmosphere. OK. How does it work? How does one side repel, yet the other attracts? And what about electromagnets, which rely on electrical current? How is this "trapped atmosphere"? 

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1437 on: January 23, 2017, 11:03:37 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.


I can compress atmosphere to create higher and lower pressures that fit perfectly with the world we live in.
What can you do with gravity to show gravity working?


Before you come in and say things like, "drop a ball/object" or "mass attracts mass", try and show how it happens that literally shows gravity at work.


No you can't. You can't compress anything. Where is your demonstration, video or any other evidence. The only thing you can produce lots off is hot air.
Your next posts to me will be met with this:
 Lonegranger

Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1435 on: Today at 06:46:19 PM »
Quote
You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.


I'm trying to help you save energy by fore-warning you.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1438 on: January 23, 2017, 11:05:31 AM »
Which brings up an interesting point. Scepti, how does denpressure explain magnetism? Could you answer this with clear, simple terms?
Magnetism is no different to how everything works. It's high versus low pressure.
the window clamp can give you a very good idea of how magnetism works. It's simply displaced atmosphere by an object.
As far as magnetism is concerned, it's trapped atmosphere within the structure of the object.

There's a reason why you can gain or lose magnetism due to heat or cold or actually hitting an object hard enough to release trapped atmosphere.

We live in an atmospheric whirlpool that is strongest at the centre and gradually weaker as it spans out in the circle of Earth.

What?
What are you going to do now, go into ridicule mode?
If you do, then explain what magnetism is from your own nut if you think you're clever.
This is you saying "it just is", nothing more. No evidence, proof, or anything else. Magnetism is trapped atmosphere. OK. How does it work? How does one side repel, yet the other attracts? And what about electromagnets, which rely on electrical current? How is this "trapped atmosphere"?
You didn't ask any of this, you just went into have a dig mode.
Have a spell in the same place lonegranger is.
No need to waste any more effort typing to me.

*

onebigmonkey

  • 1623
  • +0/-0
  • You. Yes you. Stand still laddie.
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #1439 on: January 23, 2017, 11:36:59 AM »
As you've been told already, it's the force that attracts mass to other mass. Like the atmosphere you can't see it but you can measure its effects. You can measure it reliably and very well. Its existence is only disputed by...erm...you.
I can compress atmosphere to create higher and lower pressures that fit perfectly with the world we live in.
What can you do with gravity to show gravity working?

Before you come in and say things like, "drop a ball/object" or "mass attracts mass", try and show how it happens that literally shows gravity at work.

But you can't actually show that? You just wave some equipment around and a reading changes and that proves atmosphere causes weight? Does it change colour? Smell different? What?

Try showing me literally how the atmosphere makes me weigh something.

Then show me his magnetism as trapped air causes the aurorae. In the atmosphere. Where is it trapped there?
Facts won't do what I want them to.

We went from a round Earth to a round Moon: http://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/apollo.html