Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)

  • 3822 Replies
  • 824056 Views
*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1320 on: August 29, 2016, 08:18:37 AM »
Let's take a step back and try to distill something out of this.

I'll do a Q&A with Scepti, and will answer for him. If he thinks I don't say what he means or if I am building a straw man, I'll no doubt hear that.

O: What is denpressure
S: Denpressure means that atmospheric pressure is the cause of gravity. The atmosphere pushing down on an object makes it fall.
O: But what if you remove the atmospheric pressure? Would there be gravity in a vacuum?
S: A vacuum does not exist, you can only lower the pressure but never remove the atmosphere from a container.
O: If the pressure is lowered in a chamber, will an object then become lighter?
S: No.
O: Why not?
S: Because there is atmospheric pressure built up in tiny pockets inside all matter
O: But if there is less pressure outside the object, why would the gravity on the object stay the same? Especially since any trapped atmosphere inside an object would extert a pressure outward (as evidenced by a balloon in a vacuum lower pressure environment?
S: <insert continuation of the discussion here>

I think this is the point where we are now. Care to answer/add to this?
You're  not even answering it correctly, so you're wasting your time.

I am trying to write this in good faith. If I was incorrect, please say so. I am witholding any and all debate from my side until I have a firm grasp of the discussion and it would help I think if we boil it down.
I did say so.

What did I get wrong?
You don't even know what you're saying, so I won't bother telling you what you got wrong.

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1321 on: August 29, 2016, 08:20:13 AM »
If that slosh doesn't last very long, and I'm driving a car in a circle (let's say turning to the left), and as long as I do this, objects inside will tend to move toward the right side of the car, then how is that slosh lasting so long?
It's not a slosh effect when you're driving a car in a circle. It's a constant pressure effect upon your body.
The slosh effect will only kick in once you decelerate.
Is there a pressure difference between the left side of the interior and the right side of the interior?  Why does the pressure not equalize?

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1322 on: August 29, 2016, 08:22:55 AM »
Let's take a step back and try to distill something out of this.

I'll do a Q&A with Scepti, and will answer for him. If he thinks I don't say what he means or if I am building a straw man, I'll no doubt hear that.

O: What is denpressure
S: Denpressure means that atmospheric pressure is the cause of gravity. The atmosphere pushing down on an object makes it fall.
O: But what if you remove the atmospheric pressure? Would there be gravity in a vacuum?
S: A vacuum does not exist, you can only lower the pressure but never remove the atmosphere from a container.
O: If the pressure is lowered in a chamber, will an object then become lighter?
S: No.
O: Why not?
S: Because there is atmospheric pressure built up in tiny pockets inside all matter
O: But if there is less pressure outside the object, why would the gravity on the object stay the same? Especially since any trapped atmosphere inside an object would extert a pressure outward (as evidenced by a balloon in a vacuum lower pressure environment?
S: <insert continuation of the discussion here>

I think this is the point where we are now. Care to answer/add to this?
You're  not even answering it correctly, so you're wasting your time.

I am trying to write this in good faith. If I was incorrect, please say so. I am witholding any and all debate from my side until I have a firm grasp of the discussion and it would help I think if we boil it down.
I did say so.

What did I get wrong?
You don't even know what you're saying, so I won't bother telling you what you got wrong.

I am beginning to suspect I did get it right, but now you see it summed up like this, it doesn't make sense to you either.
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1323 on: August 29, 2016, 08:27:08 AM »
If that slosh doesn't last very long, and I'm driving a car in a circle (let's say turning to the left), and as long as I do this, objects inside will tend to move toward the right side of the car, then how is that slosh lasting so long?
It's not a slosh effect when you're driving a car in a circle. It's a constant pressure effect upon your body.
The slosh effect will only kick in once you decelerate.
Is there a pressure difference between the left side of the interior and the right side of the interior?  Why does the pressure not equalize?
Because it's angled.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1324 on: August 29, 2016, 08:30:14 AM »
Let's take a step back and try to distill something out of this.

I'll do a Q&A with Scepti, and will answer for him. If he thinks I don't say what he means or if I am building a straw man, I'll no doubt hear that.

O: What is denpressure
S: Denpressure means that atmospheric pressure is the cause of gravity. The atmosphere pushing down on an object makes it fall.
O: But what if you remove the atmospheric pressure? Would there be gravity in a vacuum?
S: A vacuum does not exist, you can only lower the pressure but never remove the atmosphere from a container.
O: If the pressure is lowered in a chamber, will an object then become lighter?
S: No.
O: Why not?
S: Because there is atmospheric pressure built up in tiny pockets inside all matter
O: But if there is less pressure outside the object, why would the gravity on the object stay the same? Especially since any trapped atmosphere inside an object would extert a pressure outward (as evidenced by a balloon in a vacuum lower pressure environment?
S: <insert continuation of the discussion here>

I think this is the point where we are now. Care to answer/add to this?
You're  not even answering it correctly, so you're wasting your time.

I am trying to write this in good faith. If I was incorrect, please say so. I am witholding any and all debate from my side until I have a firm grasp of the discussion and it would help I think if we boil it down.
I did say so.

What did I get wrong?
You don't even know what you're saying, so I won't bother telling you what you got wrong.

I am beginning to suspect I did get it right, but now you see it summed up like this, it doesn't make sense to you either.
I'm not going to spend too much time playing tit for tat with you. All I will tell you is - I've spent a lot of time explaining it. You've spent a lot of time reading it all and yet you still haven't understood any of it.



« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 08:35:23 AM by sceptimatic »

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1325 on: August 29, 2016, 09:26:35 AM »
If that slosh doesn't last very long, and I'm driving a car in a circle (let's say turning to the left), and as long as I do this, objects inside will tend to move toward the right side of the car, then how is that slosh lasting so long?
It's not a slosh effect when you're driving a car in a circle. It's a constant pressure effect upon your body.
The slosh effect will only kick in once you decelerate.
Is there a pressure difference between the left side of the interior and the right side of the interior?  Why does the pressure not equalize?
Because it's angled.
What is angled? 

?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1326 on: August 29, 2016, 09:28:21 AM »
I said you could name them so you know what you're dealing with. By doing this it means you  have a better chance to grasp it all and fit it together.
Ok then. So, for the bits of matter I'll call them micateria (after the latin words for bit and matter, mica and materia) and the jawbreakers will be called strateria (after the latin words for layer and matter, stratum and materia). Why Latin? Why not. And yes, done in google translate.

So, back to the question:
Quote
But okay. So, the next question: what are solids, what are liquids, what are gases, and what is plasma? As in, how does the matter behaves in a solid, how does it behave in a liquid, etc.?
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45133
  • +92/-135
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1327 on: August 29, 2016, 09:59:07 AM »
If someone can actually give me proof that inertia actually does something to real effect, then I'll accept that as well.

What I won't accept, is people saying inertia just is. I won't accept people saying inertia is an objects resistance to movement and then an object staying in motion.
Inertia is what it does.  Inertia is why objects at rest stay at rest and why objects in motion stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force.  Please note that I'm referring to the objects as a whole, not the individual molecules that make up the objects.

Here is a video with seven demonstrations of inertia.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1328 on: August 29, 2016, 10:38:25 AM »
Because the balloon was NOT drawn to the pump. The balloon expanded against the molecules still left inside the chamber externally to the balloon and it is now acting  as a pressure plug for the hole.
It shows that a push on push is in effect.


I don't see the balloon covering the hole. All I see is the remaining air inside the balloon expanding under the decreased pressure inside the chamber. I see no proof of denpressure in this video.

Further regarding evacuation chambers, I still don't understand why objects weigh the same in low pressure systems.

The last time I asked, you gave me a one-word answer.

"Expansion"

Do you think air is trapped inside the scale, giving a false measurement?

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1329 on: August 29, 2016, 10:44:41 AM »
I know scepti will ignore me again, because answering me would disprove his notion. But I'll try again. Because I too want an answer to the same question TheRealBillNye asked:

If air pressure causes gravity, why wouldn't an object weigh less when the pressure is lowered?
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1330 on: August 29, 2016, 10:49:52 AM »
If that slosh doesn't last very long, and I'm driving a car in a circle (let's say turning to the left), and as long as I do this, objects inside will tend to move toward the right side of the car, then how is that slosh lasting so long?
It's not a slosh effect when you're driving a car in a circle. It's a constant pressure effect upon your body.
The slosh effect will only kick in once you decelerate.
Is there a pressure difference between the left side of the interior and the right side of the interior?  Why does the pressure not equalize?
Because it's angled.
What is angled?
The car is angled as it continually circles.

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1331 on: August 29, 2016, 10:51:55 AM »
Let's take a step back and try to distill something out of this.

I'll do a Q&A with Scepti, and will answer for him. If he thinks I don't say what he means or if I am building a straw man, I'll no doubt hear that.

O: What is denpressure
S: Denpressure means that atmospheric pressure is the cause of gravity. The atmosphere pushing down on an object makes it fall.
O: But what if you remove the atmospheric pressure? Would there be gravity in a vacuum?
S: A vacuum does not exist, you can only lower the pressure but never remove the atmosphere from a container.
O: If the pressure is lowered in a chamber, will an object then become lighter?
S: No.
O: Why not?
S: Because there is atmospheric pressure built up in tiny pockets inside all matter
O: But if there is less pressure outside the object, why would the gravity on the object stay the same? Especially since any trapped atmosphere inside an object would extert a pressure outward (as evidenced by a balloon in a vacuum lower pressure environment?
S: <insert continuation of the discussion here>

I think this is the point where we are now. Care to answer/add to this?
You're  not even answering it correctly, so you're wasting your time.

I am trying to write this in good faith. If I was incorrect, please say so. I am witholding any and all debate from my side until I have a firm grasp of the discussion and it would help I think if we boil it down.
I did say so.

What did I get wrong?
You don't even know what you're saying, so I won't bother telling you what you got wrong.

I am beginning to suspect I did get it right, but now you see it summed up like this, it doesn't make sense to you either.
I'm not going to spend too much time playing tit for tat with you. All I will tell you is - I've spent a lot of time explaining it. You've spent a lot of time reading it all and yet you still haven't understood any of it.

Perhaps because you've made it all up and none of it makes any sense what so ever....

Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1332 on: August 29, 2016, 10:58:53 AM »
I said you could name them so you know what you're dealing with. By doing this it means you  have a better chance to grasp it all and fit it together.
Ok then. So, for the bits of matter I'll call them micateria (after the latin words for bit and matter, mica and materia) and the jawbreakers will be called strateria (after the latin words for layer and matter, stratum and materia). Why Latin? Why not. And yes, done in google translate.

So, back to the question:
Quote
But okay. So, the next question: what are solids, what are liquids, what are gases, and what is plasma? As in, how does the matter behaves in a solid, how does it behave in a liquid, etc.?
Solids are densely packed strateria. Liquids are densley packed micateria peeled from the layers of the densley packed strateria under ultra frequent vibration.
Gases are expanded micateria derived from  densley packed micateria that were under ultra frequent vibration.
Plasma is a variation of them all.

*

Slemon

  • Flat Earth Researcher
  • 12330
  • +1/-1
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1333 on: August 29, 2016, 10:59:57 AM »
If air pressure causes gravity, why wouldn't an object weigh less when the pressure is lowered?
If I recall correctly, it's because the scales by which you're measuring the weight of an object are affected by the lowered pressure. I might be wrong, but I'm fairly sure I do remember that discussion.
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1334 on: August 29, 2016, 11:00:47 AM »

If someone can actually give me proof that inertia actually does something to real effect, then I'll accept that as well.

Bullshit.  You know the steel wheel is harder to turn than the identical looking aluminium wheel.

And you know that inertia does not do anything at all .  It is a word. 

You know the word describes something useful to humans

« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 11:04:38 AM by Aliveandkicking »

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1335 on: August 29, 2016, 11:03:11 AM »
If someone can actually give me proof that inertia actually does something to real effect, then I'll accept that as well.

What I won't accept, is people saying inertia just is. I won't accept people saying inertia is an objects resistance to movement and then an object staying in motion.
Inertia is what it does.  Inertia is why objects at rest stay at rest and why objects in motion stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force.  Please note that I'm referring to the objects as a whole, not the individual molecules that make up the objects.

Here is a video with seven demonstrations of inertia.

It literally makes no sense as a word.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1336 on: August 29, 2016, 11:03:20 AM »
If air pressure causes gravity, why wouldn't an object weigh less when the pressure is lowered?
If I recall correctly, it's because the scales by which you're measuring the weight of an object are affected by the lowered pressure. I might be wrong, but I'm fairly sure I do remember that discussion.

How would the springs be affected again?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1337 on: August 29, 2016, 11:05:00 AM »
Because the balloon was NOT drawn to the pump. The balloon expanded against the molecules still left inside the chamber externally to the balloon and it is now acting  as a pressure plug for the hole.
It shows that a push on push is in effect.


I don't see the balloon covering the hole. All I see is the remaining air inside the balloon expanding under the decreased pressure inside the chamber. I see no proof of denpressure in this video.

Further regarding evacuation chambers, I still don't understand why objects weigh the same in low pressure systems.

The last time I asked, you gave me a one-word answer.

"Expansion"

Do you think air is trapped inside the scale, giving a false measurement?
Do you agree that scales are manufactured and set under atmospheric conditions and not extreme low pressure conditions?

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1338 on: August 29, 2016, 11:06:33 AM »
If someone can actually give me proof that inertia actually does something to real effect, then I'll accept that as well.

What I won't accept, is people saying inertia just is. I won't accept people saying inertia is an objects resistance to movement and then an object staying in motion.
Inertia is what it does.  Inertia is why objects at rest stay at rest and why objects in motion stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force.  Please note that I'm referring to the objects as a whole, not the individual molecules that make up the objects.

Here is a video with seven demonstrations of inertia.

It literally makes no sense as a word.

Ho ho ho.  The word does not have to make any sense at all.

You know what is understood by the word

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1339 on: August 29, 2016, 11:08:38 AM »
Solids are densely packed strateria. Liquids are densley packed micateria peeled from the layers of the densley packed strateria under ultra frequent vibration.
Gases are expanded micateria derived from  densley packed micateria that were under ultra frequent vibration.
Plasma is a variation of them all.

Strateria? Micateria?

Please define these words, they aren't in my dictionary.

When the solid particles 'peel' off, where do the peels go?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1340 on: August 29, 2016, 11:10:24 AM »
Bullshit.  You know the steel wheel is harder to turn than the identical looking aluminium wheel.
A steel ball is harder to turn than an identical looking hollow plastic ball that is identically sprayed to match the look of the steel ball.
Why would this be?
And you know that inertia does not do anything at all .  It is a word. 
Thank you. That's all I asked. Inertia does not do anything. It is just a word.
Now then, we can discard inertia from reality and use if for fantasy only, so it doesn't interfere with real science.
You know the word describes something useful to humans
The word describes NOTHING. You admit this yourself. Nothing is not useful to humans, because nothing does not exist to be anything to anyone or anything. Just like the word, inertia.

*

Slemon

  • Flat Earth Researcher
  • 12330
  • +1/-1
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1341 on: August 29, 2016, 11:11:45 AM »
Strateria? Micateria?

Please define these words, they aren't in my dictionary.
Read the whole post, Evar's the one that used them.

Quote
When the solid particles 'peel' off, where do the peels go?
Nearby. Some might combine with other 'peels' as they're still under pressure. They don't just vanish.
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1342 on: August 29, 2016, 11:14:24 AM »
Solids are densely packed strateria. Liquids are densley packed micateria peeled from the layers of the densley packed strateria under ultra frequent vibration.
Gases are expanded micateria derived from  densley packed micateria that were under ultra frequent vibration.
Plasma is a variation of them all.

Strateria? Micateria?

Please define these words, they aren't in my dictionary.

When the solid particles 'peel' off, where do the peels go?
What happens to bubbles that pop to your eye in washing up suds?

They peel off and take their place as smaller, more condensed  bubbles that form around larger bubbles, whilst some don't fully peel off and end up covering portions of bubbles.

*

Slemon

  • Flat Earth Researcher
  • 12330
  • +1/-1
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1343 on: August 29, 2016, 11:25:05 AM »
If air pressure causes gravity, why wouldn't an object weigh less when the pressure is lowered?
If I recall correctly, it's because the scales by which you're measuring the weight of an object are affected by the lowered pressure. I might be wrong, but I'm fairly sure I do remember that discussion.

How would the springs be affected again?
I suspect the altered air pressure within the scales themselves (they're hardly designed to be airtight) would render them more sensitive: there's less resistance to motion. (This is just my understanding of the model, it's likely to be flawed). 
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1344 on: August 29, 2016, 11:26:13 AM »
If that slosh doesn't last very long, and I'm driving a car in a circle (let's say turning to the left), and as long as I do this, objects inside will tend to move toward the right side of the car, then how is that slosh lasting so long?
It's not a slosh effect when you're driving a car in a circle. It's a constant pressure effect upon your body.
The slosh effect will only kick in once you decelerate.
Is there a pressure difference between the left side of the interior and the right side of the interior?  Why does the pressure not equalize?
Because it's angled.
What is angled?
The car is angled as it continually circles.
Nope, that's not it.  I can get the same result placing objects inside a level box mounted on the end of a beam attached to a swivel at the other end and turning it.

Are you sure about this pressure difference?  Turning left, which side would have the higher pressure?

?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1345 on: August 29, 2016, 11:57:10 AM »
I said you could name them so you know what you're dealing with. By doing this it means you  have a better chance to grasp it all and fit it together.
Ok then. So, for the bits of matter I'll call them micateria (after the latin words for bit and matter, mica and materia) and the jawbreakers will be called strateria (after the latin words for layer and matter, stratum and materia). Why Latin? Why not. And yes, done in google translate.

So, back to the question:
Quote
But okay. So, the next question: what are solids, what are liquids, what are gases, and what is plasma? As in, how does the matter behaves in a solid, how does it behave in a liquid, etc.?
Solids are densely packed strateria. Liquids are densley packed micateria peeled from the layers of the densley packed strateria under ultra frequent vibration.
Gases are expanded micateria derived from  densley packed micateria that were under ultra frequent vibration.
Plasma is a variation of them all.
So in your model, as in my model, heat energy is stored as vibrations. If something is hot enough, it vibrates so much that it releases itself from the solid (or liquid) and moves freely. So, I also assume that when a strateria is connected to another strateria, they cannot move freely but are bound in place unless you rip them apart or heat them up, but free micateria (that is not part of a strateria) can float around and glide between other micateria and strateria (it is not bound in place)?
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1346 on: August 29, 2016, 11:59:32 AM »
If that slosh doesn't last very long, and I'm driving a car in a circle (let's say turning to the left), and as long as I do this, objects inside will tend to move toward the right side of the car, then how is that slosh lasting so long?
It's not a slosh effect when you're driving a car in a circle. It's a constant pressure effect upon your body.
The slosh effect will only kick in once you decelerate.
Is there a pressure difference between the left side of the interior and the right side of the interior?  Why does the pressure not equalize?
Because it's angled.
What is angled?
The car is angled as it continually circles.
Nope, that's not it.  I can get the same result placing objects inside a level box mounted on the end of a beam attached to a swivel at the other end and turning it.

Are you sure about this pressure difference?  Turning left, which side would have the higher pressure?
We are talking about the car. Do you now want to talk about a box on a beam?

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1347 on: August 29, 2016, 12:03:05 PM »
If someone can actually give me proof that inertia actually does something to real effect, then I'll accept that as well.

What I won't accept, is people saying inertia just is. I won't accept people saying inertia is an objects resistance to movement and then an object staying in motion.
Inertia is what it does.  Inertia is why objects at rest stay at rest and why objects in motion stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force.  Please note that I'm referring to the objects as a whole, not the individual molecules that make up the objects.

Here is a video with seven demonstrations of inertia.

It literally makes no sense as a word.
How about you say this "The video disproved all my claimes but I'm a little cowardly baby pretender so I will keep playing dumb." 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1348 on: August 29, 2016, 12:05:22 PM »
I said you could name them so you know what you're dealing with. By doing this it means you  have a better chance to grasp it all and fit it together.
Ok then. So, for the bits of matter I'll call them micateria (after the latin words for bit and matter, mica and materia) and the jawbreakers will be called strateria (after the latin words for layer and matter, stratum and materia). Why Latin? Why not. And yes, done in google translate.

So, back to the question:
Quote
But okay. So, the next question: what are solids, what are liquids, what are gases, and what is plasma? As in, how does the matter behaves in a solid, how does it behave in a liquid, etc.?
Solids are densely packed strateria. Liquids are densley packed micateria peeled from the layers of the densley packed strateria under ultra frequent vibration.
Gases are expanded micateria derived from  densley packed micateria that were under ultra frequent vibration.
Plasma is a variation of them all.
So in your model, as in my model, heat energy is stored as vibrations. If something is hot enough, it vibrates so much that it releases itself from the solid (or liquid) and moves freely. So, I also assume that when a strateria is connected to another strateria, they cannot move freely but are bound in place unless you rip them apart or heat them up, but free micateria (that is not part of a strateria) can float around and glide between other micateria and strateria (it is not bound in place)?
They can push into other micateria and form smaller strateria.
The vibrations are mere expansion and contraction at frequencies under whatever pressures.


*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1349 on: August 29, 2016, 12:21:53 PM »
If that slosh doesn't last very long, and I'm driving a car in a circle (let's say turning to the left), and as long as I do this, objects inside will tend to move toward the right side of the car, then how is that slosh lasting so long?
It's not a slosh effect when you're driving a car in a circle. It's a constant pressure effect upon your body.
The slosh effect will only kick in once you decelerate.
Is there a pressure difference between the left side of the interior and the right side of the interior?  Why does the pressure not equalize?
Because it's angled.
What is angled?
The car is angled as it continually circles.
Nope, that's not it.  I can get the same result placing objects inside a level box mounted on the end of a beam attached to a swivel at the other end and turning it.

Are you sure about this pressure difference?  Turning left, which side would have the higher pressure?
We are talking about the car. Do you now want to talk about a box on a beam?
I can make the turn in the car gently, and there is almost no tilt.  Anyway, the same result of objects inside having a tendency to end up at the side of the car opposite of the direction of turn happens regardless if it's a car or something else. 

Shall we use a car with a computer controlled suspension that keeps it level?  Now we have a car, or box, that remains level as it turns.  Objects inside still end up to one side. 

Which side has the higher pressure?  The side to the inside of the turn or the side to the outside of the turn?