"Commonly understood things" as created, written, and studied by round Earth believers are a travesty to what reality presents to us. You do have learn by observation, NOT just look at what your predecessors have penned and passed along through the regimen of current educational facilities.
So sorry to disappoint you, but:
I do learn by observation! I see the sun appear to rise from behind an obstacle, even over the ocean, and therefore conclude that the earth's surface is probably curved.
I see the sun and especially appear the same size right from when they appear to rise to when they appear to set and conclude that thet are much further away than "the size of the earth".
So when my personal observations fit that my "predecessors have penned" I have no reason to doubt the current Globe model.
You can learn a lot from a trained observer and they are near and available to teach truths.
Well, where are these "trained observers"? Are you sure that you don't mean observers indoctrinated into the flat earth hypothesis.
Flat maps have come a long way since those illustrated in the 17th century examples. Globes then and now are not accurate and do not reflect a reality of things understood by the many and growing number of FEers.
"
Flat maps" may "have come a long way since those illustrated in the 17th century examples", but not "flat earth maps" - there is a big difference.
If you disagree, show me any accurate
flat earth map of the whole world!
I have asked you repeatedly for this, but you refuse to supply any so I am forced to assume that
you do not have any accurate flat earth maps!
The only inaccuracy in modern Globes is because of their limitation in size. If you disagree, please point out the errors in say,
Google Earth - the "ultimate Globe".
There might be some locations that have never been mapped accurately, but if they've never been mapped accurately they cannot show accurately on any map.