What are your explanations for supernovae?

I would like to hear from all areas of FET as to how these events occur within their universe. Yes, they are observed both by specialised satellites, but are ALSO observed using ground based observatories.

Please be specific to how it works. When you inevitably use the aether to explain it, please do it in detail. 

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything? 

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

Because you spout your flat earth theory as if it is fact. If it is fact, you would have an explanation.
My own scientists have models that explain how they work and observe them working.

How does your theory explain these observed phenomena? I thought that your theory was perfect? Maybe someone can help you out.

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 07:38:55 AM

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

Because you spout your flat earth theory as if it is fact. If it is fact, you would have an explanation.
My own scientists have models that explain how they work and observe them working.

How does your theory explain these observed phenomena? I thought that your theory was perfect? Maybe someone can help you out.

Knowing something is a fact means that we have to know everything?  Your roundy scientists do not know everything, yet we are held to a different standard.  What exactly is wrong with you? 

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:57:09 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 07:38:55 AM

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

Because you spout your flat earth theory as if it is fact. If it is fact, you would have an explanation.
My own scientists have models that explain how they work and observe them working.

How does your theory explain these observed phenomena? I thought that your theory was perfect? Maybe someone can help you out.

Knowing something is a fact means that we have to know everything?  Your roundy scientists do not know everything, yet we are held to a different standard.  What exactly is wrong with you?

Uh, they're doing experiments to learn everything, you aren't?

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 08:26:56 AM

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:57:09 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 07:38:55 AM

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

Because you spout your flat earth theory as if it is fact. If it is fact, you would have an explanation.
My own scientists have models that explain how they work and observe them working.

How does your theory explain these observed phenomena? I thought that your theory was perfect? Maybe someone can help you out.

Knowing something is a fact means that we have to know everything?  Your roundy scientists do not know everything, yet we are held to a different standard.  What exactly is wrong with you?

Uh, they're doing experiments to learn everything, you aren't?

Let me know when they have learned everything. 

Quote from: JustThatOneGuy on December 20, 2015, 08:29:50 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 08:26:56 AM

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:57:09 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 07:38:55 AM

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

Because you spout your flat earth theory as if it is fact. If it is fact, you would have an explanation.
My own scientists have models that explain how they work and observe them working.

How does your theory explain these observed phenomena? I thought that your theory was perfect? Maybe someone can help you out.

Knowing something is a fact means that we have to know everything?  Your roundy scientists do not know everything, yet we are held to a different standard.  What exactly is wrong with you?

Uh, they're doing experiments to learn everything, you aren't?

Let me know when they have learned everything. 

Sure. Let me know when you've learned more than they have.

Quote from: JustThatOneGuy on December 20, 2015, 08:29:50 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 08:26:56 AM

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:57:09 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 07:38:55 AM

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

Because you spout your flat earth theory as if it is fact. If it is fact, you would have an explanation.
My own scientists have models that explain how they work and observe them working.

How does your theory explain these observed phenomena? I thought that your theory was perfect? Maybe someone can help you out.

Knowing something is a fact means that we have to know everything?  Your roundy scientists do not know everything, yet we are held to a different standard.  What exactly is wrong with you?

Uh, they're doing experiments to learn everything, you aren't?

Let me know when they have learned everything. 

As you can see, when given a simple direct question, the flat earther is quick with a logical response based in science and reason.

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 08:30:53 AM

Quote from: JustThatOneGuy on December 20, 2015, 08:29:50 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 08:26:56 AM

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:57:09 AM

Quote from: jroa on December 20, 2015, 07:38:55 AM

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

Because you spout your flat earth theory as if it is fact. If it is fact, you would have an explanation.
My own scientists have models that explain how they work and observe them working.

How does your theory explain these observed phenomena? I thought that your theory was perfect? Maybe someone can help you out.

Knowing something is a fact means that we have to know everything?  Your roundy scientists do not know everything, yet we are held to a different standard.  What exactly is wrong with you?

Uh, they're doing experiments to learn everything, you aren't?

Let me know when they have learned everything. 

As you can see, when given a simple direct question, the flat earther is quick with a logical response based in science and reason.

And, as with all threads where fact
A: I'm there
and
B: jroa's there
THIS THREAD IS DERAILED!
In answer to your sig, yes.

I would like to hear from all areas of FET as to how these events occur within their universe.

Nuclear fusion is the generally accepted cause for most (but not all) supernovae.

Your own scientists can only speculate on how they work.  Why do you expect us to know everything?

If you notice, instead of answering the OP/question, the thread is immediately turned to RET debate.

A simple, "I don't know" is sufficient. But, that is not how it works. FE questions derail to defending RET. That is the debate tactic.

So, getting back on topic and the OP, how does FE explain supernovas?

At least TheEngineer is providing a constructive debate.

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:03:43 AM

I would like to hear from all areas of FET as to how these events occur within their universe.

Nuclear fusion is the generally accepted cause for most (but not all) supernovae.

The nuclear fusion in stars is caused by huge masses affected by gravity. Gravity is not accepted in FE theories, so how can you have nuclear fusion?

Well, gravity as a force does not exist in RE or FE, so...

Quote from: TheEngineer on December 20, 2015, 09:43:56 AM

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:03:43 AM

I would like to hear from all areas of FET as to how these events occur within their universe.

Nuclear fusion is the generally accepted cause for most (but not all) supernovae.

The nuclear fusion in stars is caused by huge masses affected by gravity. Gravity is not accepted in FE theories, so how can you have nuclear fusion?

Really? Because I was told it was heat and gravity.

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 11:16:38 AM

Quote from: TheEngineer on December 20, 2015, 09:43:56 AM

Quote from: eggyk on December 20, 2015, 07:03:43 AM

I would like to hear from all areas of FET as to how these events occur within their universe.

Nuclear fusion is the generally accepted cause for most (but not all) supernovae.

The nuclear fusion in stars is caused by huge masses affected by gravity. Gravity is not accepted in FE theories, so how can you have nuclear fusion?

Really? Because I was told it was heat and gravity.

The heat is caused by the crushing effects of gravity in masses as huge as stars.