Ok you free thinking sensible people out there; as you can see, my queries cannot be rationally answered about this moon trajectory, because, as Rayzor mentioned; they just don't care to answer due to lack of interest.
That's fair enough for me. In other words, if I don't allow them to explain it all in their ridiculous space language then they won't play.
This mean they can't play, because to explain it in simple terms would to explain it in simple terms, which means that they make themselves look less than convincing in trying to show the magic of this amazing space rocket trajectory change.
Let me give you all a helping hand into what I'm talking about so you get the real insight.
When we argue about their spinning ball Earth and tell them that helicopters hovering above Earth's floor, do not notice any Earth rotation under them.
We get told that the reason for this is that the helicopter ios rotating at the same speed as the Earth and when it hovers, the atmosphere still carries it with the Earth at the same speed so we notice nothing.
Of course we know that's preposterous but they have a silly argument for that by telling you that you can jump up in a plane or train whilst it's moving and you don't go flying off. Crazy I know but there you go.
Ok let them have that.
What about their rocket in orbit as Gene Cernan mentioned. It orbited about one and a half times around the Earth at 25,000 mph and then sling shots out towards the moon.
The problem is, I'm told it's not a sling shot or a snapped centripetal imaginary string or a braking system to deflect it towards the moon.
The trouble is they won't actually tell me in simple terms just what it is.
You see, this rocket is apparently spinning around the Earth in space. Like a super fast supposed satellite.
How does the rocket go to the moon?
An object in motion (rocket) will stay in motion until acted upon by an external force. It could also be deflected by an external force but stay in motion. You know, like a space snooker white ball hitting a colour.
That could deflect the space rocket to the moon, eh?...maybe not because deflecting is a bad idea for destroying stuff as we seen in the film, gravity.
So what's to be done to get to this moon?
Apparently what happens (if they explained to me correctly) is that the rocket actually keeps orbiting the Earth and gets wider and wider with this orbit. A sort of - imagine drawing a ball and drawing a circle around it, then spiral outward so you have lot's and lot's of rings around the ball until you reach another ball (moon) and then spiral around that but only a singular circle as you orbit this.
Imagine doing this all the way to the moon at supposedly 240,000 miles away, just orbiting wider and wider and yet never falling back to Earth but always managing to spiral outward and then slowing down when you reach the moon, somehow.
Maybe that's not exactly how it works. I can't be certain if this is what the space scientists proposed happened because there doesn't seem to be any on here that can explain it by using a very simple analogy for how it happened.
Can anyone remember seeing the NASA Earth/moon trajectory PENIS diagram that Papa Legba put up.
It was really funny at the time but it showed how they supposedly went to the moon.
What it didn't show was what was explained to me.
It showed an orbit and then a straight trajectory to the moon and around the moon , then back in a straight trajectory to Earth.
If anyone can find this diagram I'd appreciate it, because this diagram indicates a sling shot to the moon and the experts on here have already told us that it wasn't a sling shot.
Confusing isn't it?
Obviously it's not confusing to the experts on here who will no doubt call me a retard and what not, as if that actually answers the questions.
