Here, you will post statements no longer than 10 sentences
Occam's razor tells us that, if two theories explain equal amounts of observations, then we should accept the one that makes the fewest assumptions: we can also note two things, those two things being that the gravity fundamental to RET relies on two assumptions (mass bending space, and this bending affecting matter), and the second is that your ten sentence rule means I could just use an ungodly amount of commas, which is what I will do:
To compare with the RE model, there is the DE model, which successfully explains observations and is derived primarily from a simple definition of aether; we define space, the medium by which we define distance, to be aether, and we note the universal tendency for things to move from high concentrations to low (barring outside interference): and we note also that we can safely do this, because laws can never be verified in all places at all times and for all situations (the Second Law of thermodynamics isn't confirmed, for example, for all possible chemical reactions), but we observe them constantly and note that is is logical for the principle to hold, therefore meaning we can safely take this as a definition of aether: and while abuse of commas would let me continue indefinitely here, it would take forever to explain the DET model entirely, suffice to say there is at most one justified assumption underpinning it, and all else is developed from observation, and logical deduction: and the model explains the world, from circumpolar stars, to distances, to what keeps us on the Earth, and the sunset, and it does all of this while being preferred by the Razor to RET, and does it in one sentence because I was in an irritating mood.