I think I'll counter this with the equally-logically-impotent and ever-appropriate, "No it hasn't."
See my sig, and answer all the questions in the OP with scientifical and reasonable answers without making anything up or trying to act like you're smart.
Go to my "On a high enough ground". The theories about the ice-wall contradicts with the facts mentioned in that thread.
What about every single time I've mentioned that the FE theory can be disproved of with a telescope?
Solar eclipses?
Other planets being round?
Why arent we travelling past any stars/planets/comets, since we are travelling in such a high speed in a straight direction?
"Absence of proof is not proof of absence" is not an argument.
FE is flawed, and you're only to blockheaded to admit it since you're probably just using it as an excuse to "hate society".

Hypothetically with the extention of "science is lies" and "the government hide the truth" the theory can have a chance.
It does not really have a chance though. It's utterly false.