Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION

  • 40 Replies
  • 15282 Views
?

abaaaabbbb63

  • 563
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V3 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #30 on: June 03, 2015, 11:38:07 PM »
Apologies, if aetheric transmission is not part of your improved theory.

It isn't part of the Dual Earth Theory. Sun lies 149,600,000 km away from the Earth.

?

abaaaabbbb63

  • 563
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V3 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #31 on: June 03, 2015, 11:40:11 PM »
Thank you President of DESA, Dual -Earth theory makes a lot more sense like this.
Question, What happens if someone jumps over those purple "concentrated aether spots" do you go into space?
It would make sense as it is well know that going into space is easier from the equators especially if flying east.

The transition is possible because of LOW, not high concentration of aether. Think!

Aether is a "thing" that is unknown to us until now. All we know is it refracts light towards the Earth, likes weird shapes (like in the sketches), and produces short-ranged wormholes when present in high concentrations.

?

abaaaabbbb63

  • 563
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V3 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #32 on: June 03, 2015, 11:42:07 PM »
I believe you need to add the bulge back in for the Northern and Southern pole areas, that JRowe had in DET version alpha 0.1.  This way the aether does not have such an extreme effect on light. 
We could increase the bulge to a point to where the aether isn't needed to "bend" the light to match observations and you will not need to have the aetheric transmission at the equator.  But that's just silly, it would need to be a spheroid shape to match observations and we would need to accept either aether pushing us down or gravity.
Also, question:  What role does aether play in the magnetic field as shown in your model?
You also have my vote as the new and total authority on all things dual Earth.

1. Any contribution to the Theory is welcomed! You will receive a "Contributor" title! Thank you for your observations and scientific facts that you presented. Bulges are now part of the Dual Earth Theory V4.

2. The aether was not proven to have a role in the magnetic field of the Earth.

?

abaaaabbbb63

  • 563
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V3 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #33 on: June 03, 2015, 11:45:03 PM »
JRowe, why don't you just shut the fuck up and let the actual dual-earth experts do their job.

You're a quack, whereas abaaaabbbb63 is the leading academic in this field.
come back when his model requires fewer assumptions, explains the ability to see across the equator, and has any kind of logical definition for aether.

some of us put work into our theories and don't appreciate seeing them being mocked by ignoramuses.

We only have one assumption in this Theory: The Aether is very weird.

And I too had to work a lot on my theory. MS Paint can be a real bi*ch sometimes.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 11:47:24 PM by abaaaabbbb63 »

*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #34 on: June 04, 2015, 12:51:59 AM »
I'd like to postulate an amendment to the dual earth model V4  to correct for the observed magnetic inclination that we see on compass needles,   what I propose is that the elevation of the south and north poles be increased to an altitude that gives the correct magnetic inclination.   I calculate that an altitude at the poles of  6371 km would fix it.

Good work so far, nice to see Jrowe agrees with the improvements.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2015, 12:53:53 AM by Rayzor »
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

?

abaaaabbbb63

  • 563
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #35 on: June 04, 2015, 04:23:17 AM »
I'd like to postulate an amendment to the dual earth model V4  to correct for the observed magnetic inclination that we see on compass needles,   what I propose is that the elevation of the south and north poles be increased to an altitude that gives the correct magnetic inclination.   I calculate that an altitude at the poles of  6371 km would fix it.

Good work so far, nice to see Jrowe agrees with the improvements.

I am currently conducting research in this field. I will go to the most remote and people-free place on Earth to minimise magnetic interference in order to conduct my study: A BlockBuster Rental Shop.

?

Gefn

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #36 on: June 04, 2015, 09:45:07 AM »
This theory has still flaws but it's still far more viable than JRowe's fairy tale. Keep up the good work.

?

abaaaabbbb63

  • 563
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #37 on: June 04, 2015, 11:04:20 AM »
This theory has still flaws but it's still far more viable than JRowe's fairy tale. Keep up the good work.

Thank you!

Nothing is perfect, and everything is improvable!

*

Dog

  • 1162
  • +0/-0
  • Literally a dog
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #38 on: June 04, 2015, 11:23:49 AM »
Keep up the good work!

?

mikewolf13

  • 126
  • +0/-0
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V3 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #39 on: June 04, 2015, 12:04:57 PM »
Apologies, if aetheric transmission is not part of your improved theory.

It isn't part of the Dual Earth Theory. Sun lies 149,600,000 km away from the Earth.

Hmmm....very interesting. Way to think outside the box. I look forward to further improvements.
Remember, evolution has never produced an Oreo in nature, therefore heart surgery is impossible.

*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: Dual-Earth Theory V4 | LATEST IMPROVED VERSION
« Reply #40 on: June 04, 2015, 12:45:51 PM »
You are slowly winning m over to the new and improved DET.  I think version 5 or version 6 may actually make me a believer depending on what adjustments are made to it. 
I really like the increase in altitude for the poles, this corrects the magnetic declination we see in everyday life and the aether will not be needed to bend light.  I think it should be a very gradual slope, maybe the diameter of the base should extend the entire disc like 6400 km or so.  There is a problem though, with the increased altitude of the poles from the equatorial region of the disc, the DE will have to spin at about 1000 mph.