How does Ether exist?

The simple existence of the Mariana trench also implies that there are 11 km between hemispheres. What's there? Is that where the fairies live?

The simple existence of the Mariana trench also implies that there are 11 km between hemispheres. What's there? Is that where the fairies live?

what? it implies that the earth is not perfectly 2d. the disks could be 200km deep, that would just be earth, and they'd still look incredibly flat to an outside observe. yet again, try to take into account scale. the earth is huge.

without resorting to childish tantrums, I would like to point out further hypocrisy, in the fact that JRowe has ignored my question. Is he illiterate? By his logic, most certainly. I asked what is there, between the two hemispheres, to which he replied that the earth is huge (insert size doesn't matter joke here).
Take a look at a disc that is has an enormous circumference, and, to scale, a small depth. It is still a cylinder not a disc. Even depending upon proportionality, it is still a cylinder.
Also, "the disks"? There are more than one? Or was that a typo? Please be careful, or your readers might stop taking you seriously... wait... nevermind.

While I remember, having scouted about on this forum for a long while: How does "the ether think you're a li'l bitch? How is it possible for space to do that? An how does said seemingly sentient ether communicate with you, and only you???

Once again, not correct scepti.  We do not know why it does not fit into the quantum field theory that unifies all the other forces.  It is an undiscovered very small detail about gravity.  We do know that the amount of matter causes gravity, the more densely packed that matter is, the more effect it has on space-time.  Hence the stronger it is felt.  More matter equals more gravitational force.  Pack it into a smaller space and that same force that would have been spread out is stronger in that space than if it were spread about.
There is a lot that is known about gravity.  When you use the mathematics of gravity it predicts the movement of the planets.  You will now scream dark matter, but there is actually more evidence for dark matter than there is for aether.  We see the effects of dark matter, we do not know what it is though.  It is not claimed to be verified as of yet.  Aether on the other hand is used by many in the FE community to explain anything you guys do not want to believe in that would break a FE idea.  Whirlpools, faster than light movement, movements of the planets, hell some of you claim it is air and space and matter and a force.  There has never been any observation of aether or its effects.  You claim the effects of something that is already explained because you do not accept that explanation, yet there is nothing linking that to aether either.  This aether concept is so overused that it has actually destroyed any credibility to the idea of using it. 
Your credibility has been shot a long time ago.  Your denpressure model should show that with enough empty space between me and a vertical wall should permit me to walk up that wall with no problems.  It also fails when simple pressure detecting equipment is used at higher altitudes.  You claim that no human can climb a mountain higher than 18000 ft, yet I have personally done this.  When I explained why we did not summit, due to a complication with one of my team (who just so happened to be my father), you decided to claim that I was using some form of my cousin's brother's roommate evidence.  This was stupid of you , as it showed your true intelligence level to me.  You claimed to have multiple degrees, yet you have no grasp on basic physics, this also shows that you are a blatant liar. 
Your claims are dismissed because they should be.  I am sure I could go find some kindergartner that could formulate a better theory than denpressure to get rid of gravity.  Oh wait there is one that rates kindergarten level that works better than yours, it's called universal acceleration.

You expended a lot of time talking garbage, just for a cheap supposed insult. Hahaha.

Quote from: Why-Am-I-Here? on May 21, 2015, 01:38:17 PM

Apologies th3rm0m3t3r0, I missed that. I still think Mikey's point still stands that it wasn't the ether that JRowe and scpeti etc use, especially JRowe, who uses it as the foundation for every argument.

JRowe and scepti are infamous trolls.
In my book, anyway.

You are one of the biggest trolls of them all.

While I remember, having scouted about on this forum for a long while: How does "the ether think you're a li'l bitch?

In fairness, that post was the result of someone hacking JRowe's account. It was amusing while it lasted.

in the fact that JRowe has ignored my question
do you know how to read? i directly responded to it. you do realize that not one person has ever proposed that the earth is perfectly 2d? the term 'disk' is not always used to refer to a 2d shape,. it is used to refer to one for which the depth is far overshadows by its other dimensions. or are you now going to whinge that the compact disc (cd) and dvds should not be called disks as they are not perfectly 2d?

Also, "the disks"? There are more than one?
the two sides of the earth. do you know anything about dual earth theory? this has been well described for quite some time. seriously, try to educate yourself, this is getting pathetic. if you are not going to even try to learn about dual earth theory then stop acting like an expert, you're clearly not. this should not be too much to ask.

How is it possible for space to do that?
the aether exists in the same way as a mind, according to my personal beliefs. this is not part of dual earth theory. i also never wrote that statement, at least try to look at the context of a post before you blatantly lie

An how does said seemingly sentient ether communicate with you, and only you???
i have also never claimed that it only communicates with me. it is behind many perceived experiences of god, for example: and it does not speak in words, just impressions, so many people may feel its touch without realizing. i was just able to put the pieces together.

in the fact that JRowe has ignored my question
do you know how to read? i directly responded to it. you do realize that not one person has ever proposed that the earth is perfectly 2d? the term 'disk' is not always used to refer to a 2d shape,. it is used to refer to one for which the depth is far overshadows by its other dimensions. or are you now going to whinge that the compact disc (cd) and dvds should not be called disks as they are not perfectly 2d?

Also, "the disks"? There are more than one?
the two sides of the earth. do you know anything about dual earth theory? this has been well described for quite some time. seriously, try to educate yourself, this is getting pathetic. if you are not going to even try to learn about dual earth theory then stop acting like an expert, you're clearly not. this should not be too much to ask.

How is it possible for space to do that?
the aether exists in the same way as a mind, according to my personal beliefs. this is not part of dual earth theory. i also never wrote that statement, at least try to look at the context of a post before you blatantly lie

An how does said seemingly sentient ether communicate with you, and only you???
i have also never claimed that it only communicates with me. it is behind many perceived experiences of god, for example: and it does not speak in words, just impressions, so many people may feel its touch without realizing. i was just able to put the pieces together.

Alright JRowe. I asked you a question. What is on the sides of the 'disc'? If there are at least 11km there, then what exists there?
"disks" imply that there are more than one. Dual Earth Theory centres entirely around one disc. One disc, dual sided, not multiple discs. Learn...to...read?
The ether exists in the same way as a mind? Damn. Wasn't aware space existed as a mind. Any proof of this? Also, look no further than the quotation above your post, from BiJane, where that statement, albeit slightly changed as I manipulated it slightly to fit the context, is easily visible.
You are the only person i have ever heard about claiming to be spoken to by space/God/everything else. Surely people feel it's touch every second if it exists everywhere? Your arguments are flailing.

What is on the sides of the 'disc'? If there are at least 11km there, then what exists there?
no idea. what shape are rock formations on the moon of pluto? it's not particularly important.

Dual Earth Theory centres entirely around one disc.
what makes you think you know my model better than me? i am fully aware of what i am proposing. there are two disks, but very close together: they are clearly separate for the sun etc to be between them. given that you blatantly just ignored direct correction, why do you come here? you've just made it even more obvious to everyone you're not interested in learning, just in ignroing, insulting and obvious straw men.


Any proof of this?
personal experience. as i said, it is not a direct part of my model nor do i expect to convince anyone of it. it is simply true.
Also, look no further than the quotation above your post, from BiJane, where that statement, albeit slightly changed as I manipulated it slightly to fit the context, is easily visible.
and even she told you i did not write it. how many times must you be corrected before you pay any attention?
You are the only person i have ever heard about claiming to be spoken to by space/God/everything else.
open a history book sometime, moron.

You expended a lot of time talking garbage, just for a cheap supposed insult. Hahaha.

So I am a little long winded in my explanations.  Its not garbage or an insult, just pointing out a very few of your failures.
Sorry it goes beyond you to actually put something other than insults into a post.  I will reword things for you in the future with smaller and less words so you can understand.  This is a veiled insult as to your intelligence level.

Quote from: Why-Am-I-Here? on May 27, 2015, 12:38:27 PM

Thank you Vauxhall, I appreciate it. I wasn't aware of this version of ether, only scepti's and JRowe's. JRowe's being the one currently under heavy dispute. If ether and space travel can co-exist, then, at least so far, I see no cause for dispute, as it seems acceptable that man has indeed visited the moon. As for Einstein, I certainly do not believe myself to be smarter, i still struggle with GCSE physics, although I must ask which model his version of ether conforms to. I assure you, JRowe disagrees.
The rest I appreciate, but cannot really address aside from, for the time being, accepting it. If you would be so kind as to give an example or two of your experiments, it would be much appreciated.
Thank you for your time.

Most scientists that reveal revolutionary information are ridiculed and disgraced at first. It will probably take Jrowe's death for the stubborn scientific community to accept his findings. In time, he will probably be vindicated.

Well sorry vaux, I have to put this out there, but you completely refused to define your variables in that thread.  Therefore, until you do, the formula is meaningless.  As for JRowe, it wont take his death, just straight answers and less insulting behavior.  Those answers need to be testable.  Its not like a scientist being scorned, more like a bullshit artist who is backed into a corner.  I am not convinced he is bullshitting for the sake of it, just he doesn't understand his claims as of yet.  Perhaps he will eventually make me question my beliefs one day, but he is not on the correct path for that yet.