Water in the toilet

  • 28 Replies
  • 6576 Views
?

Earthisacube

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« on: November 15, 2006, 10:22:24 PM »
How come if I shit in the toilet in Australia the water flows a different way than if I shit at home. Is it the round or earth or the Mcdonalds?

*

beast

  • 2997
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2006, 10:25:32 PM »
You are wrong that water in the toilet goes in a different direction based on which hemisphere you are in.

http://www.ems.psu.edu/~fraser/Bad/BadCoriolis.html

?

Joseph Bloom

  • 114
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2006, 02:53:56 AM »
Wrong. See Bart V Austrailia.
he Engineer and GeoGuy are douchebags. Period.

Also, they smell bad.

?

mjk

  • 269
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2006, 03:26:31 AM »
Quote from: "Joseph Bloom"
Wrong. See Bart V Austrailia.


the day the simpsons is seen as a reliable source of evidence is the day i gouge out someones eyes with my tongue.
quote="diegodraw"]you never mentioned anything about antagonizing naive idiots who have reason to believe they should defend what everyone already knows is logical....Not like anybody would ever have fun doing that, of course[/quote]

?

Joseph Bloom

  • 114
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2006, 04:19:32 AM »
Quote from: "mjk"
Quote from: "Joseph Bloom"
Wrong. See Bart V Austrailia.


the day the simpsons is seen as a reliable source of evidence is the day i gouge out someones eyes with my tongue.


An animated sitcom>100 year old book written by a crackpot theorist
he Engineer and GeoGuy are douchebags. Period.

Also, they smell bad.

?

Nomad

  • Official Member
  • 16894
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2006, 07:58:12 AM »
Brainiac > Animated sitcom > 100 year old book written by a crackpot theorist
Nomad is a superhero.

8/30 NEVAR FORGET

?

Harold_B

Water in the toilet
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2006, 08:00:44 AM »
Its something they have put into toliets so they are going in a different direction. Well thats my theory.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Water in the toilet
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2006, 08:32:15 AM »
Toilets don't flush in different directions in different hemispheres.  The design of the toilet determines the direction of flow.  The article beast presented is not from some 100 year old book, it is actually from Penn State's College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Masterchef

  • 3894
  • +0/-0
  • Rabble rabble rabble
Water in the toilet
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2006, 08:54:44 AM »
Quote from: "thedigitalnomad"
Brainiac > Animated sitcom > 100 year old book written by a crackpot theorist

Not quite. Many of Braniacs experiments have big flaws in them.

And they add all sorts of stupid shit to it, to dumb it down for the general public.

Mythbusters>Braniac hands down.

?

Thrudgie

  • 67
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2006, 09:23:59 AM »
Heman > everyone else. only thing that can compare to heman is his spin-off manboy.

?

Curious

  • 413
  • +0/-0
Re: Water in the toilet
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2006, 10:17:35 AM »
Quote from: "Earthisacube"
How come if I shit in the toilet in Australia the water flows a different way than if I shit at home. Is it the round or earth or the Mcdonalds?


Do the math.

In a frictionless environment the water would rotate once per day, in the bowl.  If the radius of the bowl is about 6 times the radius of the drain, then with conservation of momentum, it would cause the water to swirl 6 times a day was it drains.

Since the bowl drains in seconds, not hours, what you see is not due to the rotation of the earth.

?

Nomad

  • Official Member
  • 16894
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2006, 10:18:25 AM »
Quote from: "Masterchief2219"
Quote from: "thedigitalnomad"
Brainiac > Animated sitcom > 100 year old book written by a crackpot theorist

Not quite. Many of Braniacs experiments have big flaws in them.

And they add all sorts of stupid shit to it, to dumb it down for the general public.

Mythbusters>Braniac hands down.


Ok, Ok.  Fine.

Mythbusters > Brainiac > Animated sitcom > 100 year old book written by a crackpot theorist
Nomad is a superhero.

8/30 NEVAR FORGET

?

GUN

  • 47
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2006, 10:48:51 AM »
Screw toilets.

How about explaining the different rotation directions of cyclones?
Raa:
"Round earthers think that because someone made certain paragraphs famous and repetitive that they can fight to the death with fantasy."
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=6200.0

Ironic.....*cough*bible*cough*

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Water in the toilet
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2006, 10:53:13 AM »
Erasmus did it right here.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

GUN

  • 47
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2006, 11:03:59 AM »
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Erasmus did it right here.


But thats says the sun is over the equator - But it's not. It would have to change it's path to account for the seasons.

And if the sun was directly over the equator, how is it that the effects on the weather on the same, considering on a FE model the southern hemisphere is about twice as big as the northern hemisphere?
Raa:
"Round earthers think that because someone made certain paragraphs famous and repetitive that they can fight to the death with fantasy."
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=6200.0

Ironic.....*cough*bible*cough*

?

phaseshifter

  • 841
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #15 on: November 16, 2006, 02:33:11 PM »
Quote from: "mjk"
Quote from: "Joseph Bloom"
Wrong. See Bart V Austrailia.


the day the simpsons is seen as a reliable source of evidence is the day i gouge out someones eyes with my tongue.


It better not be a guy, because that would look so gay until you actually got the eyes out.
atttttttup was right when he said joseph bloom is right, The Engineer is a douchebag.

*

beast

  • 2997
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #16 on: November 16, 2006, 03:54:32 PM »
Yes, I too, would be much more concerned that people would think I'm gay than the fact that I'm about to have my eyes gouged out...

?

jaybird39

  • 148
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #17 on: November 16, 2006, 10:37:47 PM »
um..... EEEEEWWWWWWW!

?

Thrudgie

  • 67
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2006, 07:29:34 AM »
ive had my eyeballs licked. was pretty nasty at first, but after a while it began to feel nice. you should try it.

?

Earthisacube

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2006, 09:39:15 AM »
mythbusters is a good enough explanation for me.

*

dysfunction

  • The Elder Ones
  • 2261
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #20 on: November 17, 2006, 12:54:44 PM »
Quote from: "Thrudgie"
ive had my eyeballs licked. was pretty nasty at first, but after a while it began to feel nice. you should try it.


Yeah, not like that could cause infection or anything.
the cake is a lie

?

Erasmus

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4242
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #21 on: November 17, 2006, 12:56:38 PM »
Quote from: "dysfunction"
Yeah, not like that could cause infection or anything.


I've had my tongue licked and I didn't get an infection.  I guess my body has some way of combating that sort of thing.  Maybe it works with my eyeballs too.
Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?

?

Joseph Bloom

  • 114
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #22 on: November 17, 2006, 05:25:10 PM »
So... the Corialis Effect? Any FEtards go an explaination?
he Engineer and GeoGuy are douchebags. Period.

Also, they smell bad.

?

Erasmus

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4242
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #23 on: November 17, 2006, 05:58:43 PM »
Quote from: "Joseph Bloom"
FEtards


Don't people who use this word know how it's actually spelled?  Doesn't that.... concern them?
Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?

?

Jveritas8

  • 158
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #24 on: November 17, 2006, 07:07:56 PM »
Quote from: "Joseph Bloom"
So... the Corialis Effect? Any FEtards go an explaination?


Why would anyone ever want to answer a question posed by you when all you are doing is being condescending and calling them retards?
he earth is a giant frisbee being thrown around the universe by George Bush and Zeus.

?

Earthisacube

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #25 on: November 17, 2006, 08:46:47 PM »
Quote

Why would anyone ever believe the earth is flat and try to answer a question posed by you when they are all retards?

?

Joseph Bloom

  • 114
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2006, 01:55:26 AM »
Quote from: "Jveritas8"
Quote from: "Joseph Bloom"
So... the Corialis Effect? Any FEtards go an explaination?


Why would anyone ever want to answer a question posed by you when all you are doing is being condescending and calling them retards?



Anyone who thinks the earth is flat *is* a retard.
he Engineer and GeoGuy are douchebags. Period.

Also, they smell bad.

?

Earthisacube

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #27 on: November 19, 2006, 07:04:52 AM »
The mythbusters could prove what shape the earth is. Jamie would just build a model of a round earth and flat earth and some how produce scientific results that were amazingly true.

*

beast

  • 2997
  • +0/-0
Water in the toilet
« Reply #28 on: November 19, 2006, 07:25:37 AM »
You don't need to be a mythbuster to prove that the Earth is round, you just need to be able to think a little.  Unfortunately the round Earthers who frequent this forum appear incapable of that.  Well I exaggerate a little, but I often feel an urge to show them just how easy it is.  I've dropped soooooo many clues whenever somebody gets close to a good subject to use to prove it (or at least prove that the current FE model doesn't work and that the RE model does work for my experiment).  The funny thing is that we (the FEers) ultimately try our best to push the REers in the right direction, but instead of excepting what we say and coming up with real proofs, they fight our statements with unprovable argument.  

I think Sceptical Scientist put it very well when he commented that for most REers, the shape of the Earth is a belief instilled through acceptance of authority and not a scientific fact (for them).  Erasmus also wrote a very good post a while ago about how he hoped that people would learn about questioning 'truth' and acceptance through this forum.  Maybe in the majority of cases that doesn't happen but I think there are a few people occasionally who do get it.

Actually it's interesting because I'm just reading about memes and some proposed evolutionary reasons as to why people believe in God in The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins and you actually can see the very things he's talking about in the dogmatic RE believers (as opposed to those who don't need to 'believe').  This forum perfectly illustrates his points and I suggest everybody reads it.  It gives such a better perspective of this place and I think it finally explains to me why people argue the RE side and why so many people get so angry and worked up about it.