And taking rather a risk here, but proving that my interest is in proper moderation rather than my own personal benefit, if you really think I have broken so many rules that I should have been banned out of existence, then surely admitting you haven't done it is admitting that you are indeed shit at moderating?
Perhaps, but if you want to make this argument then you must recant all the times you've said we're ban-crazy and show overt favortisom to flat-earthers. You cannot both say these things and call us shit mods for not banning you.
OK, good point. You're not ban crazy, but you do indulge in inappropriate posting.
And the favoritism. You cannot both say our moderation skews heavily to non-flat-earthers and also say we are shit mods for being so lenient on you.
Nay. I shall not concede this point. You are simplifying it by saying "because we haven't banned you, therefore we don't favouritise FE'ers" which is a non sequitur. If you were to take your moderation as a whole, including telling people to stop posting low content and not to debate in Q&A, you are skewed in favour of the flat side. All of us are free to comb through your post history to check if I am simply speaking opinion or fact. You and jroa also appear to be blind to each other's transgressions. You especially Pongo, are unable to resist debating in Q&A, and the reaction when I pointed this out was for jroa to simply to chop my post out of the thread. Highly professional. Then when I tried to raise honest debate and opinion on whether you were debating, the thread was moved from Debate (which it was) to Angry Ranting (which it wasn't, but at least being in the lower forum allowed me to openly insult you.) And even there, the balance of opinion was that you
had been debating in Q&A.