tennis ball experiment

  • 80 Replies
  • 25736 Views
*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #30 on: February 18, 2015, 02:34:25 PM »
Obviously not, since I am from Italy (ask your government colleagues webmasters for my IP address). I am flattered by your suspicion of me being Scepti, one of the smartest people I have met in my life.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Please you're killing me here.......
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #31 on: February 18, 2015, 03:12:19 PM »
Stop pasting unrelated conspiracy garbage.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #32 on: February 18, 2015, 03:22:37 PM »
Wow, calling the beheadings hoaxes. Thats some crass shit right there.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

?

gpssjim

  • 514
  • +0/-0
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #33 on: February 18, 2015, 04:23:15 PM »
Wow, I really have a complete confirmation that you guys are either sheeple or shills.
I could give a rat's behind about your conspiracy theories.  The topic at hand is the shape of the earth.  You seem to use false arguments about the flatness of the earth to segue into other topics. 

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #34 on: February 18, 2015, 04:42:59 PM »
Wow, I really have a complete confirmation that you guys are either sheeple or shills. I wll stop posting from here on. I will just keep my three friends, the only 3 truthers I met here, out of hundreds of shills/sheeple.

You were the best quality of sheeple/shills I have ever met on the web. I am impressed. But still high-quality sheeple, shills or trolls.

But maybe even more dangerous, because polite, intelligent, respectful. Similar to Mark Dice's style. A stylish government agent.

So long.

Bye scepti.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

*

kman

  • 990
  • +0/-0
  • Pastafarian
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #35 on: February 18, 2015, 05:04:33 PM »
Wow, I really have a complete confirmation that you guys are either sheeple or shills. I wll stop posting from here on. I will just keep my three friends, the only 3 truthers I met here, out of hundreds of shills/sheeple.

You were the best quality of sheeple/shills I have ever met on the web. I am impressed. But still high-quality sheeple, shills or trolls.

But maybe even more dangerous, because polite, intelligent, respectful. Similar to Mark Dice's style. A stylish government agent.

So long.

It's quite obnoxious how FE-ers always assume everyone else is an idiot or being payed by the government. It says more about them than the people they're accusing.
Quote from: Excelsior John
[USA TODAY and NPR] are probaley just a bunch of flippin wite sapremist websites you RASCIST
Quote from: modestman
i don't understand what you are saying=therfore you are liar

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #36 on: February 19, 2015, 03:51:47 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #37 on: February 19, 2015, 03:53:04 AM »
Wow, I really have a complete confirmation that you guys are either sheeple or shills. I wll stop posting from here on. I will just keep my three friends, the only 3 truthers I met here, out of hundreds of shills/sheeple.

You were the best quality of sheeple/shills I have ever met on the web. I am impressed. But still high-quality sheeple, shills or trolls.

But maybe even more dangerous, because polite, intelligent, respectful. Similar to Mark Dice's style. A stylish government agent.

So long.
Oh fuck off you self righteous prick.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #38 on: February 19, 2015, 04:37:48 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

So much fail.

If you put a rock on the ground and look in its direction dying daylight you will see it. Why?

Because it's reflecting light......

Now think of the moon as a really big rock, reflecting sunlight.....

Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #39 on: February 19, 2015, 07:36:36 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

So much fail.

If you put a rock on the ground and look in its direction dying daylight you will see it. Why?

Because it's reflecting light......

Now think of the moon as a really big rock, reflecting sunlight.....
the moon can't reflect sunlight at night, idiot. that's what night is. and even if it could, no rock is that bright.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

kman

  • 990
  • +0/-0
  • Pastafarian
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #40 on: February 19, 2015, 07:39:01 AM »
Alright, of the moon is a giant ball of gas like the sun, explain the phases of the moon.
Quote from: Excelsior John
[USA TODAY and NPR] are probaley just a bunch of flippin wite sapremist websites you RASCIST
Quote from: modestman
i don't understand what you are saying=therfore you are liar

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #41 on: February 19, 2015, 07:47:21 AM »
Alright, of the moon is a giant ball of gas like the sun, explain the phases of the moon.
there's a thread in Q&A called perspective, i explain it all very clearly in the latest post there.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #42 on: February 19, 2015, 07:47:38 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

What experiment did you do that makes you believe that the Moon is like the Sun?
What do you mean no rock can glow or reflect?  I know that the Moon doesn't glow but even rocks on Earth reflect, although it's way more diffuse then a mirror reflection, but the Moon has the same reflective properties of any old rock you find on the ground.  Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?

Also, stars have existed before humanity and there are star charts that were made by ancient civilizations and the stars even played a large role in mythology all around the world.  If the government is faking the stars with planes then the planes would have to have gotten up there at some point and I think that people would notice if the stars weren't there until they started appearing one day.  Also, planes need fuel and how do they get fuel if they never land.  I know that faking a trajectory is easy but the angular distance between stars is constant no matter where you are on Earth and what time of year it is, and that is impossible unless the stars are really far away but then seasonal constellations and northern/southern constellations can only be explained if the Earth is round.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #43 on: February 19, 2015, 07:53:00 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

So much fail.

If you put a rock on the ground and look in its direction dying daylight you will see it. Why?

Because it's reflecting light......

Now think of the moon as a really big rock, reflecting sunlight.....
the moon can't reflect sunlight at night, idiot. that's what night is. and even if it could, no rock is that bright.

Night happens because we are in the shadow of the Earth but the Moon is only in Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse, so it is almost always lit on the side facing the Sun.  The reason why the Moon looks so bright at night is because your eyes are adjusted to the dark and letting in more light.  At a time when the Moon is visable in the day and you hold a rock illuminated by the sun and compare it to the Moon then the rock and the Moon would appear to glow about the same amount.  I could actually do the math myself to calculate the reflectivity of the Moon, it's not that hard.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #44 on: February 19, 2015, 07:55:51 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

What experiment did you do that makes you believe that the Moon is like the Sun?
What do you mean no rock can glow or reflect?  I know that the Moon doesn't glow but even rocks on Earth reflect, although it's way more diffuse then a mirror reflection, but the Moon has the same reflective properties of any old rock you find on the ground.  Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?

Also, stars have existed before humanity and there are star charts that were made by ancient civilizations and the stars even played a large role in mythology all around the world.  If the government is faking the stars with planes then the planes would have to have gotten up there at some point and I think that people would notice if the stars weren't there until they started appearing one day.  Also, planes need fuel and how do they get fuel if they never land.  I know that faking a trajectory is easy but the angular distance between stars is constant no matter where you are on Earth and what time of year it is, and that is impossible unless the stars are really far away but then seasonal constellations and northern/southern constellations can only be explained if the Earth is round.

i do not think the moon is made of gas. please go to the Q&A thread perspective where i have made my thoughts clear. i do not want to get too off topic. it is clear no rock is ever as bright as your moon. don't pretend.

ancient civilizations were not able to compare the stars between the hemispheres, and they would have made many mistakes. that, and it's common knowledge the government doctors history to put them in the best light.
planes can refuel while in motion. a non-lit plane goes along side it, fills a second fuel tank, and then the star-plane switches tanks in order to continue. They rely on cloud cover when the plane needs repairs, or an in-sky switch over, where one plane illuminates itself the instant the other turns off. this is all quite obvious if you think about it.
don't trust everything you're spoon fed, have you never realized governments have a motive?
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #45 on: February 19, 2015, 08:47:28 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

What experiment did you do that makes you believe that the Moon is like the Sun?
What do you mean no rock can glow or reflect?  I know that the Moon doesn't glow but even rocks on Earth reflect, although it's way more diffuse then a mirror reflection, but the Moon has the same reflective properties of any old rock you find on the ground.  Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?

Also, stars have existed before humanity and there are star charts that were made by ancient civilizations and the stars even played a large role in mythology all around the world.  If the government is faking the stars with planes then the planes would have to have gotten up there at some point and I think that people would notice if the stars weren't there until they started appearing one day.  Also, planes need fuel and how do they get fuel if they never land.  I know that faking a trajectory is easy but the angular distance between stars is constant no matter where you are on Earth and what time of year it is, and that is impossible unless the stars are really far away but then seasonal constellations and northern/southern constellations can only be explained if the Earth is round.

i do not think the moon is made of gas. please go to the Q&A thread perspective where i have made my thoughts clear. i do not want to get too off topic. it is clear no rock is ever as bright as your moon. don't pretend.

ancient civilizations were not able to compare the stars between the hemispheres, and they would have made many mistakes. that, and it's common knowledge the government doctors history to put them in the best light.
planes can refuel while in motion. a non-lit plane goes along side it, fills a second fuel tank, and then the star-plane switches tanks in order to continue. They rely on cloud cover when the plane needs repairs, or an in-sky switch over, where one plane illuminates itself the instant the other turns off. this is all quite obvious if you think about it.
don't trust everything you're spoon fed, have you never realized governments have a motive?

Just because they couldn't compare them doesn't mean that the ancients didn't have star charts from both hemispheres, there was civilization in quite a lot of places even though they didn't always know about each other.  If stars were planes then the ancients wouldn't have seen any stars at all and the night sky would have been black, do you honestly think that nobody would notice stars appearing?  Also, planes were invented around the time of WWI and stars have been used for navigation for far longer then that.  If I point my telescope at a plane flying overhead I can distinctly make out it's shape but if I point my telescope at a star then it looks like a bright point no matter how much I magnify it, and also if I aim my telescope at a dark part of the sky then it reveals more stars that I couldn't see before, and that would require many planes.  Why wouldn't the government just make RET say that stars shouldn't exist?  Even the Bible mentions stars and regardless of weather it's true it was no doubt written a really long time ago.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #46 on: February 19, 2015, 10:13:14 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

What experiment did you do that makes you believe that the Moon is like the Sun?
What do you mean no rock can glow or reflect?  I know that the Moon doesn't glow but even rocks on Earth reflect, although it's way more diffuse then a mirror reflection, but the Moon has the same reflective properties of any old rock you find on the ground.  Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?

Also, stars have existed before humanity and there are star charts that were made by ancient civilizations and the stars even played a large role in mythology all around the world.  If the government is faking the stars with planes then the planes would have to have gotten up there at some point and I think that people would notice if the stars weren't there until they started appearing one day.  Also, planes need fuel and how do they get fuel if they never land.  I know that faking a trajectory is easy but the angular distance between stars is constant no matter where you are on Earth and what time of year it is, and that is impossible unless the stars are really far away but then seasonal constellations and northern/southern constellations can only be explained if the Earth is round.

i do not think the moon is made of gas. please go to the Q&A thread perspective where i have made my thoughts clear. i do not want to get too off topic. it is clear no rock is ever as bright as your moon. don't pretend.

ancient civilizations were not able to compare the stars between the hemispheres, and they would have made many mistakes. that, and it's common knowledge the government doctors history to put them in the best light.
planes can refuel while in motion. a non-lit plane goes along side it, fills a second fuel tank, and then the star-plane switches tanks in order to continue. They rely on cloud cover when the plane needs repairs, or an in-sky switch over, where one plane illuminates itself the instant the other turns off. this is all quite obvious if you think about it.
don't trust everything you're spoon fed, have you never realized governments have a motive?

Just because they couldn't compare them doesn't mean that the ancients didn't have star charts from both hemispheres, there was civilization in quite a lot of places even though they didn't always know about each other.  If stars were planes then the ancients wouldn't have seen any stars at all and the night sky would have been black, do you honestly think that nobody would notice stars appearing?  Also, planes were invented around the time of WWI and stars have been used for navigation for far longer then that.  If I point my telescope at a plane flying overhead I can distinctly make out it's shape but if I point my telescope at a star then it looks like a bright point no matter how much I magnify it, and also if I aim my telescope at a dark part of the sky then it reveals more stars that I couldn't see before, and that would require many planes.  Why wouldn't the government just make RET say that stars shouldn't exist?  Even the Bible mentions stars and regardless of weather it's true it was no doubt written a really long time ago.
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.
stars exist: they are, like the sun and moon, spotlights, and fade with distance. i've no idea what you're trying to get at.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #47 on: February 19, 2015, 10:45:06 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites. i think the behavior we see is what we would expect on the fictional environment they have created.
the simplest way we can tell that the moon landings were faked, is because it is not possible to land on the moon. it is simply too hot. the moon is a body much like the sun: less intense, but when you are closer, the heat will increase. we know this because no rock can glow or reflect like round earthers claim.
i applaud your ability to think for yourself, however.

What experiment did you do that makes you believe that the Moon is like the Sun?
What do you mean no rock can glow or reflect?  I know that the Moon doesn't glow but even rocks on Earth reflect, although it's way more diffuse then a mirror reflection, but the Moon has the same reflective properties of any old rock you find on the ground.  Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?

Also, stars have existed before humanity and there are star charts that were made by ancient civilizations and the stars even played a large role in mythology all around the world.  If the government is faking the stars with planes then the planes would have to have gotten up there at some point and I think that people would notice if the stars weren't there until they started appearing one day.  Also, planes need fuel and how do they get fuel if they never land.  I know that faking a trajectory is easy but the angular distance between stars is constant no matter where you are on Earth and what time of year it is, and that is impossible unless the stars are really far away but then seasonal constellations and northern/southern constellations can only be explained if the Earth is round.

i do not think the moon is made of gas. please go to the Q&A thread perspective where i have made my thoughts clear. i do not want to get too off topic. it is clear no rock is ever as bright as your moon. don't pretend.

ancient civilizations were not able to compare the stars between the hemispheres, and they would have made many mistakes. that, and it's common knowledge the government doctors history to put them in the best light.
planes can refuel while in motion. a non-lit plane goes along side it, fills a second fuel tank, and then the star-plane switches tanks in order to continue. They rely on cloud cover when the plane needs repairs, or an in-sky switch over, where one plane illuminates itself the instant the other turns off. this is all quite obvious if you think about it.
don't trust everything you're spoon fed, have you never realized governments have a motive?

Just because they couldn't compare them doesn't mean that the ancients didn't have star charts from both hemispheres, there was civilization in quite a lot of places even though they didn't always know about each other.  If stars were planes then the ancients wouldn't have seen any stars at all and the night sky would have been black, do you honestly think that nobody would notice stars appearing?  Also, planes were invented around the time of WWI and stars have been used for navigation for far longer then that.  If I point my telescope at a plane flying overhead I can distinctly make out it's shape but if I point my telescope at a star then it looks like a bright point no matter how much I magnify it, and also if I aim my telescope at a dark part of the sky then it reveals more stars that I couldn't see before, and that would require many planes.  Why wouldn't the government just make RET say that stars shouldn't exist?  Even the Bible mentions stars and regardless of weather it's true it was no doubt written a really long time ago.
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.
stars exist: they are, like the sun and moon, spotlights, and fade with distance. i've no idea what you're trying to get at.

There are some scenarios where the stars we see are not possible without impossible geometry, light bending, or a round Earth like the large and small Magellanic Clouds for examplethat are visible from anywhere in the southern hemisphere but not at all in the northern hemisphere and they're always south of you when they are visible.  Please explain how you think this is possible, whether or not airplanes are involved, on a flat Earth
« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 07:45:51 AM by mikeman7918 »
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #48 on: February 19, 2015, 11:40:05 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites.

So you are saying an entity that was created in 1958 fakes the stars and their paths... that humans have charted and recorded with incredible detail and accuracy for at least 8,000 years...

Great point! *thumbs up* I hope you get a gold sticker for effort today!
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

*

Dinosaur Neil

  • 3177
  • +0/-0
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #49 on: February 19, 2015, 01:30:59 PM »
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

How did NASA compensate before powered flight was invented?
Also, why don't you ever use the caps key?
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

*

ausGeoff

  • 6091
  • +0/-0
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #50 on: February 19, 2015, 01:54:20 PM »
I will stop posting from here on. I will just keep my three friends, the only 3 truthers I met here, out of hundreds of shills/sheeple.

Best news I've read all day.  Thank you kindly.    ;D

(Shit... maybe there is a god?)

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #51 on: February 19, 2015, 02:42:46 PM »
I will stop posting from here on. I will just keep my three friends, the only 3 truthers I met here, out of hundreds of shills/sheeple.

Best news I've read all day.  Thank you kindly.    ;D

(Shit... maybe there is a god?)

He's a liar sadly.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #52 on: February 20, 2015, 04:47:50 AM »
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

How did NASA compensate before powered flight was invented?
Also, why don't you ever use the caps key?
NEVER SAID THAT. TRY AGAIN.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #53 on: February 20, 2015, 04:50:12 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites.

So you are saying an entity that was created in 1958 fakes the stars and their paths... that humans have charted and recorded with incredible detail and accuracy for at least 8,000 years...

Great point! *thumbs up* I hope you get a gold sticker for effort today!
nope. try reading. if you're going to respond, don't make shit up.
it's easy for old records to be faked (the government rewrites history, common knowledge, deal with it), and nasa only deal with some stars to maintain the illusion.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

?

BJ1234

  • 1931
  • +0/-0
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #54 on: February 20, 2015, 06:39:57 AM »
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

How did NASA compensate before powered flight was invented?
Also, why don't you ever use the caps key?
NEVER SAID THAT. TRY AGAIN.
Then what did you mean when you said.
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #55 on: February 20, 2015, 07:38:06 AM »
you can't call the moon landing faked for those reasons. nasa is not going to make it so easy, i know they would put a lot of time and energy and thought into deceiving the world. they fake stars and star paths, and give gps units a specific program to fake the behavior of satellites.

So you are saying an entity that was created in 1958 fakes the stars and their paths... that humans have charted and recorded with incredible detail and accuracy for at least 8,000 years...

Great point! *thumbs up* I hope you get a gold sticker for effort today!
nope. try reading. if you're going to respond, don't make shit up.
it's easy for old records to be faked (the government rewrites history, common knowledge, deal with it), and nasa only deal with some stars to maintain the illusion.

Oh? Did they also go around re-chiseling clay tablets from Babylon and repainting the murals of Rome, Egypt and Greece?

NASA is kind of bad ass even if they aren't going to space in your little deluded fantasy world, you sad sack.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #56 on: February 20, 2015, 09:22:26 AM »
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

How did NASA compensate before powered flight was invented?
Also, why don't you ever use the caps key?
NEVER SAID THAT. TRY AGAIN.
Then what did you mean when you said.
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.
i meant nasa compensates. that doesn't mean they compensated all throughout history, we have no reason to believe stars were the exact same historically. the technology to map them in detail long-term hasn't been around much longer than planes, and it is well known governments alter history. a couple of chips here, a couple of added words there, lies upon lies.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #57 on: February 20, 2015, 09:47:51 AM »
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

How did NASA compensate before powered flight was invented?
Also, why don't you ever use the caps key?
NEVER SAID THAT. TRY AGAIN.
Then what did you mean when you said.
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.
i meant nasa compensates. that doesn't mean they compensated all throughout history, we have no reason to believe stars were the exact same historically. the technology to map them in detail long-term hasn't been around much longer than planes, and it is well known governments alter history. a couple of chips here, a couple of added words there, lies upon lies.

Demonstrably false going as far back as 6,000 BC.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #58 on: February 20, 2015, 09:49:03 AM »
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

How did NASA compensate before powered flight was invented?
Also, why don't you ever use the caps key?
NEVER SAID THAT. TRY AGAIN.
Then what did you mean when you said.
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.
i meant nasa compensates. that doesn't mean they compensated all throughout history, we have no reason to believe stars were the exact same historically. the technology to map them in detail long-term hasn't been around much longer than planes, and it is well known governments alter history. a couple of chips here, a couple of added words there, lies upon lies.

...  But what about southern constellations which are geometrically impossible on a flat Earth?
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: tennis ball experiment
« Reply #59 on: February 20, 2015, 09:54:20 AM »
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.

How did NASA compensate before powered flight was invented?
Also, why don't you ever use the caps key?
NEVER SAID THAT. TRY AGAIN.
Then what did you mean when you said.
please try reading. i've never said every star is faked. some are just not visible when they should be, so nasa compensates.
i meant nasa compensates. that doesn't mean they compensated all throughout history, we have no reason to believe stars were the exact same historically. the technology to map them in detail long-term hasn't been around much longer than planes, and it is well known governments alter history. a couple of chips here, a couple of added words there, lies upon lies.

...  But what about southern constellations which are geometrically impossible on a flat Earth?
i'd sick of repeating myself. try to actually read what i've been saying.
the only such constellations that are truly impossible are the fictional ones which go over the south pole. those simply do not exist, as the south pole is a ring, not an island floating at the bottom of the world.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.