Well as interesting this was to read, a few comments. Ones that seem to be made over and over again. Theory has a specific meaning in science. Skepti as a scientist you should know this. But as a refresher here is hypothesis and theory.
hypothesis: a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in your study. For example, an experiment designed to look at the relationship between study habits and test anxiety might have a hypothesis that states, "We predict that students with better study habits will suffer less test anxiety." Unless your study is exploratory in nature, your hypothesis should always explain what you expect to happen during the course of your experiment or research.
theory: a well-established principle that has been developed to explain some aspect of the natural world. A theory arises from repeated observation and testing and incorporates facts, laws, predictions, and tested hypotheses that are widely accepted. Kendra Cherry, aboutpsychology.com
In general parlance most people use theory to mean guess or in rare instances hypothesis. Since we are discussing evidence and ideas that hopefully represent the real word, model it and make predictions we should be using these terms correctly. If you are discussing an idea that has a ponderousness of evidence and makes predictions then please refer to it as a theory, eg. Quantum Theory. If you have an idea which you cannot present much evidence for and is limited in predictive power please use hypothesis. And please none of this, well we are not scientists etc. you are putting forth what you claim to be scientific ideas. Use the correct nomenclature.
Thank you!
Gravity theory, quantum theory, black hole theory, Higgs boson theory, warped space time theory, special relativity theory. Need I go on? All theories that the scientific world pass off as a sort of fact but cleverly use theory as both a fact and a guess, because it leaves scope for a future where they can be proved wrong, even though everything supposedly works how they predicted it.
I don't follow the mainstream scientific route where Earth and space are concerned, so I will use my theory, which is my theory, not fact.
Hypothesis can be used as well but theory takes less time to type and is basically the same thing in normal terms. The scientific world use theory as a simple truth to us mere common people. You see, they won't ever say science FACT because smarter people are born every day and one day a smart person will simply destroy their theories, forcing them to make more stuff up, then tell us all that the other stuff was only theory after all.
It's a bit stupid really. It would be better for them to simply admit that they are playing guessing games and simply making crap up. But then again, that would destroy the fantasy they are trying to pacify us all with
My Earth is a much more fitting Earth than the Earth we are told to accept. Mock it if you feel the need but I'm serious and I don't need to sit and sling out calculations to explain it. It just needs to be told in simple terms for those with insight to grasp , no matter how slowly.
To grasp what I'm saying, requires people to put to bed the nonsense of gravity and a whole host of other stuff. It's not easy for anyone to do...but: if done, it opens up a whole new thinking on it all.
Most people have me down as a nut job and clueless, which is fine with me. I'm under no illusions about anything like that as I know that people aren't going to step outside of their comfort zone of mass opinion to become a ridicule target.
I get told time and time again that I don't present evidence. I present enough material to give food for thought. What I don't do, is copy and paste answers. I use my own mind and my own words.
I don't get impressed by people telling me about this and that which they copied from web pages/wiki or whatever, because that's the whole thing I'm actually dismissing. So if I dismiss mainstream web pages, I'm not exactly going to accept someone regurgitating it, am I?
The simple truth, as far as I'm concerned, which comes before I even put my THEORIES forward....is...your science is riddled with fantasy to make it all work, especially where the Earth and your space are concerned.
That's not a dig at you or even the other people that subscribe to that, as you are only caught up the same as most. A belief and trust in your higher peers.
Humans are like dogs and owners. The owners being those at the very top and the dogs being us mere common people that are given some status in the world depending on breed.
What we all mainly have in common is, we can be humiliated and kicked...ridiculed and starved.....ordered to sit and beg and perform tasks...yet be so faithful that we accept it and come back for more, rarely thinking that the potential to run free is always there....it's just a case of being domesticated enought to realise that lone survival is against you, plus the fact that if managed, the added chance of being snared and brought back into line or put down, are always the other options.
Compliance gains rewards. Pampered poodles live pampered, CONTROLLED lives. To be free, you have to be a strong breed....the wolf.
Having said all that, forgive me if my persona comes across as arrogant. I am arrogant. I'm a genius. I'm a top man in my field. I am the ultimate. I am a lone wolf.
I have to be like this because I'm dealing with ultra arrogant people, every day in all walks of life, including here.
I fight fire with fire and that's just the way it is. I afford respect to those that warrant it. I treat people in whatever manner they treat me.
I will blow my own trumpet if necessary as loud as people blow theirs, maybe even louder if need be.
The simple end to what I'm saying, is very simple. My Earth is far superior and real to the one that is portrayed to you global Earth indoctrinates. I can't really make it any plainer.