Scepti - Nuclear Power Stations

Did you give them a hand taking off the reactor top? Did they show you anything fissioning?

Quote from: sokarul on May 01, 2014, 02:44:55 PM

You can use chemistry to analyze samples. You can see the composition change. Fresh yellow cake is emits almost no gamma radiation. But check a sample of yellow cake that has been sitting for 20 years and it emits a great amount of gamma radiation.

Of course it does. If you sit a chunk of cadolizion in a container of chlorhalvazide for 12 years, it emits huge amounts of mozza radiation, which is capable of fissioning and producing heat for 50 years from just one 50 gram block. It is amazing stuff.

Quote from: sokarul on May 01, 2014, 02:44:55 PM

No, it was not a guess. They knew chain reactions happen. They knew the energy of the alpha particle. The predicted it had enough energy to split an atom. They knew they needed a higher concentration of uranium 235 to get the chain reaction working. Then they were able to test it.

What do you mean, they knew the energy of the alpha particle and PREDICTED it had enough energy to split an atom. Do you realise what you're saying.
They can't see this stuff and yet they simply predict stuff, then bang, a chain reaction.
Can't you see how bloody stupid this all is?

Of course people do science for a living. I have no problem with that. I do have a massive problem with this uranium fissioning bollocks, though.
Stop pretending you've seen things that you haven't.

Of course people do science for a living. I have no problem with that. I do have a massive problem with this uranium fissioning bollocks, though.
Stop pretending you've seen things that you haven't.

Incidentally, I still haven't seen any reports in any of the science journals about your laser/ice sheet experimental results.  Why is that?  Have you submitted them to any of these journals for peer review in order to confirm your research results yet?  And if you haven't, why then not?  I would've thought by now you would've received world-wide notoriety for actually proving what Samuel Rowbotham tried to prove all those years ago.  And you'd also totally disprove the round earth model at the same time.

And I note that you've still not defined the units of measurement for your "denpressure" hypothesis, or explained whether it's a scalar quantity or a vector quantity.  Is "denpressure" involved in any way with nuclear fission and/or fusion at an atomic level?

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 05:57:00 AM

Of course people do science for a living. I have no problem with that. I do have a massive problem with this uranium fissioning bollocks, though.
Stop pretending you've seen things that you haven't.

Unless you have a nuclear engineering degree you opinion has no value. In fact asking questions like that shows us you NEED to visit the nuclear power station. Don't you think asking question to an expert would give you the exact answer.

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 05:57:00 AM

Of course people do science for a living. I have no problem with that. I do have a massive problem with this uranium fissioning bollocks, though.
Stop pretending you've seen things that you haven't.

I note that you've chosen to avoid addressing my perfectly legitimate questions sceptimatic... again.
 

Quote

Incidentally, I still haven't seen any reports in any of the science journals about your laser/ice sheet experimental results.  Why is that?  Have you submitted them to any of these journals for peer review in order to confirm your research results yet?  And if you haven't, why then not?  I would've thought by now you would've received world-wide notoriety for actually proving what Samuel Rowbotham tried to prove all those years ago.  And you'd also totally disprove the round earth model at the same time.

And I note that you've still not defined the units of measurement for your "denpressure" hypothesis, or explained whether it's a scalar quantity or a vector quantity.  Is "denpressure" involved in any way with nuclear fission and/or fusion at an atomic level?

What are you afraid of?  Why no answers yet?  Or was the whole "experiment" thing bullshit from day one?

Where is the data? You can make all the claims you want but until you don't back it up with some evidence they remain as claims with no value whatsoever. You made no experiment (or it showed you wrong).

Quote from: Starman on May 02, 2014, 06:06:40 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 05:57:00 AM

Of course people do science for a living. I have no problem with that. I do have a massive problem with this uranium fissioning bollocks, though.
Stop pretending you've seen things that you haven't.

Unless you have a nuclear engineering degree you opinion has no value. In fact asking questions like that shows us you NEED to visit the nuclear power station. Don't you think asking question to an expert would give you the exact answer.

Answer these questions, see where we gets to.

Do you think if I ask an expert about the moon, he/she will tell me all about the moon?
Do you think if I ask an expert about man landing on the moon he/she will tell me all about it?
Do you think if I ask an expert about the mars landers, he/she will tell me all about it?
Do you think if I ask an expert about what gravity is, he/she will tell me?
And so on and so on and so on.

Do you think if I ask an expert on nuclear power, he/she will tell me?

I'll answer for you:
Of course they will tell me all about it. Now should I just accept that, even though it all appears extremely questionable?

Should I just accept what they all say is true, then just be on my merry way accepting anything told to me, like a small child waiting for santa to land on his roof?

Give your head a massive shake. There's a reason I'm questioning stuff. If there wasn't a reason, then I wouldn't be questioning.
Just because you sit and suck your lollipop whilst kicking your little feet on a chair, believing anything told to you doesn't mean you are right. It means you have spent your whole life being a naive, gullible person.

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 06:17:08 AM

Quote from: Starman on May 02, 2014, 06:06:40 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 05:57:00 AM

Of course people do science for a living. I have no problem with that. I do have a massive problem with this uranium fissioning bollocks, though.
Stop pretending you've seen things that you haven't.

Unless you have a nuclear engineering degree you opinion has no value. In fact asking questions like that shows us you NEED to visit the nuclear power station. Don't you think asking question to an expert would give you the exact answer.

Answer these questions, see where we gets to.

Do you think if I ask an expert about the moon, he/she will tell me all about the moon?
Do you think if I ask an expert about man landing on the moon he/she will tell me all about it?
Do you think if I ask an expert about the mars landers, he/she will tell me all about it?
Do you think if I ask an expert about what gravity is, he/she will tell me?
And so on and so on and so on.

Do you think if I ask an expert on nuclear power, he/she will tell me?

I'll answer for you:
Of course they will tell me all about it. Now should I just accept that, even though it all appears extremely questionable?

Should I just accept what they all say is true, then just be on my merry way accepting anything told to me, like a small child waiting for santa to land on his roof?

Give your head a massive shake. There's a reason I'm questioning stuff. If there wasn't a reason, then I wouldn't be questioning.
Just because you sit and suck your lollipop whilst kicking your little feet on a chair, believing anything told to you doesn't mean you are right. It means you have spent your whole life being a naive, gullible person.

The answer is there is not one expert on each of those items there are thousands and millions. That is what makes it creditable. You are the one that just said if 100 people would agree on something would it make them loonies.

I've had some excellent feed back from mods and admin over the experiment.

I offered to show you it in a pm and you refused, so don't start whining about it now.

Where is the data?

That was all I was making from the off. Claims.
I have no evidence. I have no more evidence to prove it's false than you have to prove it's true, PERSONALLY.

That is cute. You know I can't go to space but others can take my place. Now you CAN go to the nuclear power plant.

Quote from: Starman on May 01, 2014, 06:26:58 AM

That is cute. You know I can't go to space but others can take my place. Now you CAN go to the nuclear power plant.

It's not wise to hand over control to others and let them speak for you.

No you haven't.  Not one single member of this forum has ever confirmed receiving confirmation or an outline of your purported experiment from you—despite just being asked for a simple yes or no.

One can only assume that you've not received any "feedback" from any moderator or administrator on this forum.

  So as it stands, we have yet to see even the slightest evidence proving that your experiment was actually carried out as you claim.

If either jroa or Ski could confirm they've received the preliminary results of your alleged experiment, then I may reconsider my opinion.

Incorrect.  I never "refused" to accept a PM from you confirming your alleged experiment.  You got all hot and bothered when I started asking specific, technical questions which you couldn't answer, and—like a parent refusing a kid a lolly—refused to PM me as some sort of juvenile "punishment".

I suspect the real reason you didn't PM me was simply because their was no "experiment" to confirm; it was all bullshit from day one.

Here is what you said: "If 100 people were put forward who weren't mainstream, they would not be credible and be cast off as loons"

It's not wise to hand over control to others and let them speak for you.

Quote from: bravimone on May 02, 2014, 06:35:26 AM

Where is the data?

There is no data.  There was no "experiment".  sceptimatic is just making stuff up.  And there were no PMs to other forum members.  The whole thing is one massive fairy story that he's now trying desperately to back out of.

It's actually quite funny watching him squirm whenever he's asked for some tangible evidence.   

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 06:40:37 AM

That was all I was making from the off. Claims.
I have no evidence. I have no more evidence to prove it's false than you have to prove it's true, PERSONALLY.

Final you admit it: you have no evidence. But i do have some, i've been on a ~2000m mountains, where i was able to see the sea some 100 km away, while of course it isn't possible when on the ground. The flat earth explanation for this, the longer distance for the light to travel doesn't make sense: (100˛ + 2˛)˝ = 100.02km, that is 20m. pythagora tells you that the light had only around 20 meters more to travel from the sea to get to my eyes than to get to the base of the mountain.

edit: typo

Quote from: ausGeoff on May 02, 2014, 07:00:54 AM

No you haven't.  Not one single member of this forum has ever confirmed receiving confirmation or an outline of your purported experiment from you—despite just being asked for a simple yes or no.

Quote

Why would they confirm anything to you?

I wasn't asking for anybody to confirm anything to me personally; no other member of this forum has ever confirmed to anybody else at all that they received a PM from you.  Why is that?  Because you never PMd anybody at all that's why LOL.
 

 

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 07:34:42 AM

Quote from: ausGeoff on May 02, 2014, 07:00:54 AM

No you haven't.  Not one single member of this forum has ever confirmed receiving confirmation or an outline of your purported experiment from you—despite just being asked for a simple yes or no.

Quote

Why would they confirm anything to you?

I wasn't asking for anybody to confirm anything to me personally; no other member of this forum has ever confirmed to anybody else at all that they received a PM from you.  Why is that?  Because you never PMd anybody at all that's why LOL.

Why would anybody on this forum confirm anything to anyone from my pm? Pm's are private.

Wait till I slap the top of your head and say, "hello, is there anybody in there."

I was talking about nuclear power stations when I said I had no direct evidence to back up my claim.

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 07:40:07 AM

Wait till I slap the top of your head and say, "hello, is there anybody in there."

I was talking about nuclear power stations when I said I had no direct evidence to back up my claim.

We were talking about your experiment on the ice lake purportedly proving the earth is flat.

Quote from: bravimone on May 02, 2014, 09:16:50 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 07:40:07 AM

Wait till I slap the top of your head and say, "hello, is there anybody in there."

I was talking about nuclear power stations when I said I had no direct evidence to back up my claim.

We were talking about your experiment on the ice lake purportedly proving the earth is flat.

You all seen me clearly give Geoffrey 1 hour to pm me, right? He didn't do so, so what's he scared of?

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 10:50:15 AM

Quote from: bravimone on May 02, 2014, 09:16:50 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 07:40:07 AM

Wait till I slap the top of your head and say, "hello, is there anybody in there."

I was talking about nuclear power stations when I said I had no direct evidence to back up my claim.

We were talking about your experiment on the ice lake purportedly proving the earth is flat.

You all seen me clearly give Geoffrey 1 hour to pm me, right? He didn't do so, so what's he scared of?

The question is what are you scared of?  If the evidence and experiment is such that it will show, without a doubt, that the earth is flat, why not stand by your convictions and put it out there for all to see?  Why send it just to those who agree with you?

Quote from: BJ1234 on May 02, 2014, 10:55:12 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 10:50:15 AM

Quote from: bravimone on May 02, 2014, 09:16:50 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on May 02, 2014, 07:40:07 AM

Wait till I slap the top of your head and say, "hello, is there anybody in there."

I was talking about nuclear power stations when I said I had no direct evidence to back up my claim.

We were talking about your experiment on the ice lake purportedly proving the earth is flat.

You all seen me clearly give Geoffrey 1 hour to pm me, right? He didn't do so, so what's he scared of?

The question is what are you scared of?  If the evidence and experiment is such that it will show, without a doubt, that the earth is flat, why not stand by your convictions and put it out there for all to see?  Why send it just to those who agree with you?

Experience has taught me that people like you are of a mind to simply dismiss EVERYTHING that goes against your globe.
I'm not giving you the opportunity to dismiss this after all the expense and time put into it by simply putting it in the forum for you all to dismiss it and ridicule it, so I sent it to the people who I knew would appreciate it.
375 people have access to it at this present time. Over 40 of them are scientists. The feed back has been immense to the point that many of them are going to expand on it with some added extras, which they tell me I will see the results of.

It's a brilliantly done experiment which cannot be debunked legitimately.

Experience has taught me that people like you are of a mind to simply dismiss EVERYTHING that goes against your globe.