Theoretical Physicists

Did your chemical degree teach you anything? 

Did your chemical degree teach you anything?

The degree, no, the classes, yes.
So why again does light bend? How does light know which direction to bend? Why is theoretical physics bad but Zeteticism is good?

It is a nice way to say, "I can make stuff up and you can't prove me wrong."

Discuss.

Twin Quasar. Theoretical Physics found to be REAL AS F*CK. Gravitational lensing. Seeing the same quasar twice.


x2

Quote from: jroa on April 11, 2014, 11:35:04 PM

Did your chemical degree teach you anything?

The degree, no, the classes, yes.
So why again does light bend? How does light know which direction to bend? Why is theoretical physics bad but Zeteticism is good?

Are you saying that diffraction is not real? 

Quote from: sokarul on April 11, 2014, 11:40:59 PM

Quote from: jroa on April 11, 2014, 11:35:04 PM

Did your chemical degree teach you anything?

The degree, no, the classes, yes.
So why again does light bend? How does light know which direction to bend? Why is theoretical physics bad but Zeteticism is good?

Are you saying that diffraction is not real?

Don't ignore my twin quasar post.

Light does not travel in straight lines.  It bends.  This is what we have been trying to tell you all along.

The mass of the SUN can barely bend the light of the stars behind it, a few arcseconds (or arcminutes, idr) at best. The earth, whose mass isn't even 10^-5 that of the sun, can do less.

Another victory for the FES.

you remind me of this guy:

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Iraq's Comical Ali

Quote from: sokarul on April 11, 2014, 11:40:59 PM

Quote from: jroa on April 11, 2014, 11:35:04 PM

Did your chemical degree teach you anything?

The degree, no, the classes, yes.
So why again does light bend? How does light know which direction to bend? Why is theoretical physics bad but Zeteticism is good?

Are you saying that diffraction is not real?

Answer the questions before you ask a question.

Your ignorance is comical.

You don't even understand a line of sight.

Light does not travel in straight lines.  It bends.  This is what we have been trying to tell you all along.

Actually, light does travel in a straight line.  It's space-time that bends.

Does light not diffract?  Does that not mean it is bending? 

Does light not diffract?  Does that not mean it is bending?

Diffraction is not the same as refraction, refraction is not the same as gravitational lensing, and 'bendy light' (as required for any FEH) is, by necessity, completely contrary to all of these other known phenomena.

So, the scientists are lying about light diffracting now? 

So, the scientists are lying about light diffracting now?

Tell us what scientist have said.

Are you now claiming that scientists don't believe in light diffraction? 

Nobody said light doesn't diffract jroa. It's just all these different known phenomena that cause light waves to change direction are not anything like what's described on this website as bendy light.

Changing air density causes diffraction.  Or, are you now claiming that the air density is homogeneous? 

Changing air density causes diffraction.  Or, are you now claiming that the air density is homogeneous?

This doesn't seem to be a coherent response. Are you drunk?

I am sorry if I used big words.  Let me know which ones confused you and I will try to define them for you. 

You are saying that I am claiming that air is homogenous.

I never said that and you are making stuff up again.

If anything, your bendy light would be homogenous.

Jroa, I didn't understand what you meant by diffraction.  Can you please explain precisely what you mean by diffraction, and is it the same as the phenomena explained as diffractino by Wikipedia?

It means that light does not travel in straight lines. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction

The premise for bendy light is that light naturally bends. Diffraction is a property of light when it encounters an obstacle.
Refraction is when light changes it's path because of a change in medium. So you clearly meant to use refraction in this thread. For future arguments, please use the proper words.

It means that light does not travel in straight lines. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction

How does diffraction apply in the FE model?

Only around large massive gravity object. It will not bend is a few miles over the surface of the earth. There is a big difference.
So the Earth is not a 'large gravity object'?

It will bend over just a few feet if the conditions are right.  I am just saying light can and does bend. 

It will bend over just a few feet if the conditions are right.  I am just saying light can and does bend.

Wow, good job.

Are you now claiming that scientists don't believe in light diffraction?

Are you now saying my cat is made of cheese?  Are you saying scientists think I'm on fire?

Or am I just making strawman arguments in a tedious passive aggressive manner?

You would be made of fire if Phlogiston Theory is proven to be true, would you not? 

You would be made of fire if Phlogiston Theory is proven to be true, would you not?

No.  And Phlogiston theory was falsified quite a while ago.  Do keep up.