Theoretical Physicists

It is a nice way to say, "I can make stuff up and you can't prove me wrong."

Discuss.

Yea, i always thought that was an odd job title too. But does this really have anything to do with FET?

Except when they make this possible...
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

It is a nice way to say, "I can make stuff up and you can't prove me wrong."

Do you mean stuff like Relativity and Quantum Physics which are among the most tested theories around?  Or were you referring to stuff like Universal Acceleration, bendy light and other FE made up theoretical physics?

It is a nice way to say, "I can make stuff up and you can't prove me wrong."

Discuss.

You know it is not like that. Say what you want to say about them.

They can make anything up and you can't prove them wrong. 

They can make anything up and you can't prove them wrong.

It still does not work that way. They again.

If I recall, there were several experiments done to validate Einstein's theories.  In fact, had the predictions not been observed, it would have proven him wrong.
In 1919, Sir Arthur Eddington took pictures of stars behind the eclipse of the sun.  He then measured the position of these stars and the light from them bent in accordance with Einstein's General Relativity.  Had these star positions not changed, Einstein would have been proven wrong. 

Therefore, your statement is incorrect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse_of_May_29,_1919

How far off were the stars on these black and white photos?  Were they barely measurable? 

They can make anything up and you can't prove them wrong.

Incorrect.
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-most-famous-scientific-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-wrong.php

markjo is actually trying to be an FE'er for a change.  Bravo markjo. 

How far off were the stars on these black and white photos?  Were they barely measurable?

It does not matter exactly how much. He  presented in his 1920 paper announcing its success, confirming Einstein's theory that light "bends". It was accepted because other astronomers reviewed it. If you have a degree in astronomy you can evaluate and have a valid opinion.

Bendy light has been proven to be true.  Another victory for the FES. 

Bendy light has been proven to be true.  Another victory for the FES.

Only around large massive gravity object. It will not bend is a few miles over the surface of the earth. There is a big difference.

Another victory for the FES.

Another victory for the FES.

Not really. What did your FE theory had to say about that?

Light does not travel in straight lines.  It bends.  This is what we have been trying to tell you all along. 

Light does not travel in straight lines.  It bends.  This is what we have been trying to tell you all along.

But lemme guess, you can't explain why?

You said you were going to guess, and then you asked a question instead.  Perhaps you don't understand how guessing works? 

Light does not travel in straight lines.  It bends.  This is what we have been trying to tell you all along.

We are talking about two different things. Light will bend in a medium. It will bend in a medium like water, clouds, glass. it is called refraction. Here is the definition.

Refraction is essentially a surface phenomenon. The phenomenon is mainly in governance to the law of conservation of energy and momentum. Due to change of medium, the phase velocity of the wave is changed but its frequency remains constant.

What was proven in the 1920 test was the light in NO medium like space can be bent by gravity alone.

markjo is actually trying to be an FE'er for a change.  Bravo markjo.

Incorrect.  I'm just pointing out that the premise of your OP is nonsense.

You said you were going to guess, and then you asked a question instead.  Perhaps you don't understand how guessing works?

no, it was a guess, the question mark was awaiting confirmation

Guessing does not usually involve question marks, unless I am mistaken. 

Guessing does not usually involve question marks, unless I am mistaken.

I donno, i see question marks over your head every time i read a post from ya, so...

Are you saying i am guessing about something? 

See, that was a question and involved a question mark. 

Are you saying i am guessing about something? 

See, that was a question and involved a question mark.

Maybe you're just not used to the nuances of human interaction, see normally, a guess comes along with an implied implication of knowing if the guess was correct.

Maybe you just don't know how guesses work. 

Light does not travel in straight lines.  It bends.  This is what we have been trying to tell you all along.

Your ignorance does not constitute evidence for you argument.

Your ignorance is comical. 

Your ignorance is comical.

Did the military teach you that?