earth from outer space

Quote from: 3.14159265359 on March 25, 2014, 05:39:44 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on March 25, 2014, 05:27:54 AM

What kind of photographed evidence would you accept to be valid?

the kind that is real?i have already explained the details,for example the ISS is to low for the frame i wish for.

I think you would reject any picture.
Here's a solution, get a weather balloon, and a camera, and take your own photo's.
you can't dispute that can you?

You've already been told iit's not high enough. He/she wants one from space that he/she can analyse to confirm it's legitimacy.
[/quote]
finally some one who understands ,and as to complete what i was writing earlier(i believe was not so clear),i do accept any photoshoped image as long as it is of a real picture.
and just for the record i am a "he" 

Quote from: sceptimatic on March 25, 2014, 06:01:18 AM

Nobody will ever give you a picture of Earth from space, because nobody can get into space to do so. The fact that you've never seen a genuine picture of Earth from space should tell you all you need to know.

Except that there are millions of genuine pictures and videos of space everywhere. You simply reject them because you refuse to admit that you are wrong. But you are. You're wrong.

Well go and get one and show the OP it. That's what is being asked for.

Quote from: sceptimatic on March 25, 2014, 06:01:18 AM

Nobody will ever give you a picture of Earth from space, because nobody can get into space to do so. The fact that you've never seen a genuine picture of Earth from space should tell you all you need to know.

Except that there are millions of genuine pictures and videos of space everywhere. You simply reject them because you refuse to admit that you are wrong. But you are. You're wrong.

He has to say EVERY picture EVER taken is a fake. Does not make any sense. Why would all that money and time be spend to take fake pictures that would benefit the world. We are talking about millions of pictures and videos.

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on March 25, 2014, 05:27:54 AM

What kind of photographed evidence would you accept to be valid?

the kind that is real?i have already explained the details,for example the ISS is to low for the frame i wish for.

That is a fair answer. Define me real and who is going to take tour picture.
[/quote]
come on dude.. real is real,i bet you can spot the difference between real and fake

Quote from: rottingroom on March 25, 2014, 06:08:03 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on March 25, 2014, 06:01:18 AM

Nobody will ever give you a picture of Earth from space, because nobody can get into space to do so. The fact that you've never seen a genuine picture of Earth from space should tell you all you need to know.

Except that there are millions of genuine pictures and videos of space everywhere. You simply reject them because you refuse to admit that you are wrong. But you are. You're wrong.

Well go and get one and show the OP it. That's what is being asked for.

Are you trying to act like we haven't posted them already in this thread? Or the literally thousands of pictures and videos that have been posted over time on this very forum? Or the several that I've personally posted myself?

Nobody will ever give you a picture of Earth from space, because nobody can get into space to do so. The fact that you've never seen a genuine picture of Earth from space should tell you all you need to know.

precisely!but then again...no prof on either sides FE - RE

Quote from: sceptimatic on March 25, 2014, 06:01:18 AM

Nobody will ever give you a picture of Earth from space, because nobody can get into space to do so. The fact that you've never seen a genuine picture of Earth from space should tell you all you need to know.

precisely!but then again...no prof on either sides FE - RE

denial.

what millions are you talking about?there are just very few,except maybe the millions of post of the same pictures and videos,but to the point:there is 0(zero) thrue videos of earth from outer space.if you know one please post it..there is a real wish to be cometrue in stake 

Quote from: sceptimatic on March 25, 2014, 06:01:18 AM

Nobody will ever give you a picture of Earth from space, because nobody can get into space to do so. The fact that you've never seen a genuine picture of Earth from space should tell you all you need to know.

precisely!but then again...no prof on either sides FE - RE

I absolutely agree, which is extremely odd. When you think of the billions upon billions that NASA has had until present day and the supposed space station, satellites, Hubble and moon walkers, etc, etc, etc and yet not one legitimate photo of Earth and no real proof of a rotating globe, except for desperate attempts like coriolis effect which they explain to people by using a FLAT roundabout, then a silly pendulum.

Flat Earth believers do not have any means to get into space and no budget for Hollywood type filming, even bad filming like the moon landing crap.
But anyway. Any person with any questioning mind would have to ask why everything about a globe or space that gets put out, either looked like paintings, CGI or manipulated video, down to models and all the rest of it.

Any pictures of Earth either show no stars in the background with the excuse that they can't be seen then they decide to put stars in and lots of them when it takes their fancy.
You may be on the fence but I bet you are slipping right off the global side, even if you don't believe in a flat Earth.

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on March 25, 2014, 06:14:49 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on March 25, 2014, 06:01:18 AM

Nobody will ever give you a picture of Earth from space, because nobody can get into space to do so. The fact that you've never seen a genuine picture of Earth from space should tell you all you need to know.

precisely!but then again...no prof on either sides FE - RE

I absolutely agree, which is extremely odd. When you think of the billions upon billions that NASA has had until present day and the supposed space station, satellites, hubble and moon walkers, etc, etc, etc and yet not one legitimate photo of Earth and no real proff of a rotating globe, except for desperate attempts like coriolis effect which they explain to people by using a FLAT roundabout, then a silly pendulum.

Flat Earth believers do not have any means to get into space and no budget for Hollywood type filming, even bad filming like the moon landing crap.
But anyway. Any person with any questioning mind would have to ask why everything about a globe or space that gets put out, either looked like paintings,CGI or manipulated video, down to models and all the rest of it.

Any pictures of Earth either show no stars in the background with the excuse that they can't be seen then they decide to put stars in and lots of them when it takes their fancy.
You may be on the fence but I bet you are slipping right off the global side, even if you don't believe in a flat Earth.

God you are retarded. Why do some pictures of space have stars in them and some don't? What is the RE excuse. You tell us, because we are sick of holding your hand.

God you are retarded. Why do some pictures of space have stars in them and some don't? What is the RE excuse. You tell us, because we are sick of holding your hand.

No need to hold my hand, I'm doing just fine. You can get as frustrated as you want but you won't get anywhere doing it, except high blood pressure and a headache.
I'll give you your due though. You do try. If you can't throw them off the scent, then attempt ridicule. It doesn't appear to work in this case, now does it?
Stars appear in pictures as and when it's decided the picture fits reality that amateur astronomers see through their little scopes.

It's insane that people in these forums act like this stuff doesn't exist. I get that you don't believe it is real, but to act as if RE'rs haven't shown you stuff like this before is bat shit crazy.

Quote from: rottingroom on March 25, 2014, 06:31:36 AM

God you are retarded. Why do some pictures of space have stars in them and some don't? What is the RE excuse. You tell us, because we are sick of holding your hand.

No need to hold my hand, I'm doing just fine. You can get as frustrated as you want but you won't get anywhere doing it, except high blood pressure and a headache.
I'll give you your due though. You do try. If you can't throw them off the scent, then attempt ridicule. It doesn't appear to work in this case, now does it?
Stars appear in pictures as and when it's decided the picture fits reality that amateur astronomers see through their little scopes.

Fucktard, let me get something through your head. I merrily call you an idiot. I'm not upset about it. I'm just referring to you by what I think you appropriately are. I'm typing on a keboard, I live on the earth, I'm drinking coffee, you're an idiot. All facts.

Wrong answer on the stars thing. Show us you aren't stupid sceppy. You don't even have to know the answer. All you have to do is show us that you know how to use a modern search engine. I believe in you!

I've resized the image for you.

Fucktard, let me get something through your head. I merrily call you an idiot. I'm not upset about it. I'm just referring to you by what I think you appropriately are. I'm typing on a keboard, I live on the earth, I'm drinking coffee, you're an idiot. All facts.

Wrong answer on the stars thing. Show us you aren't stupid sceppy. You don't even have to know the answer. All you have to do is show us that you know how to use a modern search engine. I believe in you!

The OP wants a picture of the Earth. He doesn't mind if it's stitched or whatever as long as the pictures are of a real Earth from SPACE so he can analyse for himself. Now you say you have lots of them, so put a few up for him. It's a reasonable ask.
I would do it myself but I can't find any real pictures of Earth from space.
Is your coffee, nice?

Now to be objective, before i continue to upload hi res pictures to the server,
Let's ask an FEer to post some photo's of the flat earth, for comparison. Preferably from high altitude.

It's insane that people in these forums act like this stuff doesn't exist. I get that you don't believe it is real, but to act as if RE'rs haven't shown you stuff like this before is bat shit crazy.

He's been told about the stars and exposure levels about 50 fucking times.  Not accepting the explanation is one thing, but pretending he has never heard it before it straight up lying.

Whether he is just playing the retard or actually is retarded is hard to tell.  He's certainly not an honest debater, that's for sure.

Quote from: rottingroom on March 25, 2014, 06:45:14 AM

Fucktard, let me get something through your head. I merrily call you an idiot. I'm not upset about it. I'm just referring to you by what I think you appropriately are. I'm typing on a keboard, I live on the earth, I'm drinking coffee, you're an idiot. All facts.

Wrong answer on the stars thing. Show us you aren't stupid sceppy. You don't even have to know the answer. All you have to do is show us that you know how to use a modern search engine. I believe in you!

The OP wants a picture of the Earth. He doesn't mind if it's stitched or whatever as long as the pictures are of a real Earth from SPACE so he can analyse for himself. Now you say you have lots of them, so put a few up for him. It's a reasonable ask.
I would do it myself but I can't find any real pictures of Earth from space.
Is your coffee, nice?

3.14 is doing a fine job imbecile.

My coffee is good. Having a wonderful positive day!

as a side note regarding exposure and photo's of stars, if you take a photo of the moon FROM your backyard, you won't see any stars in the background. why expect them in space with a much brighter subject?

You guys need to calm your tits, k?

As far as I know, just like you don't see stars during the day on earth, you won't see stars in space or on the surface of the moon unless in the shadow of something like earth, or the moon.

And the nice picture of Africa from apollo 17 was actually modified. Yep, it was flipped so the continents were more easily identified.

this is addressed to 3.14159265359
i will write something about each picture you have posted in the reverse way of your postings i hope i'll get it right :

 Reply #42 -http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/LARGE/GPN-2000-001138.jpg--again,this is one of the "blue marble" images and is an old version(the newer ones look even more disturbing so please no more).if you look with an eye of a person who can appreciate proportions you will notice that the land mass is to big for all the continents to fit on this,a bit,to small globe,but first of all is to round compared to the scientific findings.about proportions ask a friend good at mathematics to help you.
 Reply #41-http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/LARGE/GPN-2000-001489.jpg--in this one i can not comment on the authenticity of the sphere part but i recognize no stellar pattern,and trust me : i know my stars,even worse they seem to be placed at a random that just mimics parts of the night sky/space behind + all the scratches??.and again for the record..i will be even more convinced with a newer quality of picture though this one is closest in composition(distance)
 Reply #39 a. your picture-http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/LARGE/GPN-2001-000009.jpg=moon craters and mountains+few stars+earth(notice the clouds and continent fragment,ok?) - space mission apollo 8
b. yet another picture of the same mission,apollo 8-http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planetary/earth/apollo08_earthrise.jpg=different contrast(not a worry),same moon craters and mountains(exactly same position as in "a." frame)+a tiny bit higher earth from moon surface(denoting probably some time lapse) but same clouds same continent fragment+ and most important totally different stars though in comparison with the earth almost same place as in "a."
c. NOW apollo 11- http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_44_6552.gif=almost same(in fact so similar that i had to overlap in photoshop to test if my visual accuracy is still "on" and there it was an actual piece of "a." horizon is a part of  the "c." except for the tiny mountain tip that is blunted in part for the later) mountainous moon horizon but larger the depth field+ a different earth(different mission/different time-naturally ) with dfferent clouds;but no freaking stars...hmm
Reply #48  i leave this one  at last because is just simply not in category,though is a beautiful horizon of mother earth and a real picture.by the way here are some examples of what i call real pictures with sky objects with no super duper photo camera involved,so yes it is possible to have earth and stars in the same(probably long time exposure)picture
http://milgistrust.wildlifedirect.org/files/2009/04/venus-moon-and-jupiter.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gnvPRiWIzqc/Taefz5-skGI/AAAAAAAAA8E/XyRXT91LHYI/s1600/moon+town.jpg

as notfruit suggested...please calm your self's down,this is no argue thread and to be honest we could all do better by having a nice cup of chat instead of mugs of insults.i have no intention to continue in such a way so write down something constructive and in answer to my quest,not your own misjudging of what you tink is going on....
come on..please

as notfruit suggested...please calm your self's down,this is no argue thread and to be honest we could all do better by having a nice cup of chat instead of mugs of insults.i have no intention to continue in such a way so write down something constructive and in answer to my quest,not your own misjudging of what you tink is going on....
come on..please

I'm sorry but I will continue to insult people who believe the earth is flat. It is idiotic.

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on March 25, 2014, 11:24:30 AM

as notfruit suggested...please calm your self's down,this is no argue thread and to be honest we could all do better by having a nice cup of chat instead of mugs of insults.i have no intention to continue in such a way so write down something constructive and in answer to my quest,not your own misjudging of what you tink is going on....
come on..please

I'm sorry but I will continue to insult people who believe the earth is flat. It is idiotic.

then that implies you are not truly sorry,is it now? and if not flat then how is it?i mean,fore sure is not flat but for sure is not globular either.to think,based on not even possible true measurements(just suppositional measurements) that the moon is that distance,that the sun is this big,that the universe is so...and so on and on(we all know the story)sounds as fantastic as anything else that is not proven to the FACT.proven to the fact means that someone had experienced on "it's own skin" all that is believing .for example one that had a psychedelic experience on ayahuasca and had met the cosmic serpent which is the DNA and get his knowledge and truthfulness,can afterward storytell to the others but only his experience fellow mates can confirm approval.to the rest it is just a supposition,or the group that had the same experience can evolve it into a theory and bring some facts about and try,just try to convince the others with various results.
  but me...i am simple and easy to convince in this quest with just the right picture or video,but sadly i am strongly starting to believe there is no such thing

Quote from: rottingroom on March 25, 2014, 11:36:02 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on March 25, 2014, 11:24:30 AM

as notfruit suggested...please calm your self's down,this is no argue thread and to be honest we could all do better by having a nice cup of chat instead of mugs of insults.i have no intention to continue in such a way so write down something constructive and in answer to my quest,not your own misjudging of what you tink is going on....
come on..please

I'm sorry but I will continue to insult people who believe the earth is flat. It is idiotic.

then that implies you are not truly sorry,is it now? and if not flat then how is it?i mean,fore sure is not flat but for sure is not globular either.to think,based on not even possible true measurements(just suppositional measurements) that the moon is that distance,that the sun is this big,that the universe is so...and so on and on(we all know the story)sounds as fantastic as anything else that is not proven to the FACT.proven to the fact means that someone had experienced on "it's own skin" all that is believing .for example one that had a psychedelic experience on ayahuasca and had met the cosmic serpent which is the DNA and get his knowledge and truthfulness,can afterward storytell to the others but only his experience fellow mates can confirm approval.to the rest it is just a supposition,or the group that had the same experience can evolve it into a theory and bring some facts about and try,just try to convince the others with various results.
  but me...i am simple and easy to convince with just the right picture or video,but sadly i am strongly starting to believe there is no such thing

You seem to type a lot and say nothing. Back to the tread what are you looking for in simple questions.

Quote from: rottingroom on March 25, 2014, 11:36:02 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on March 25, 2014, 11:24:30 AM

as notfruit suggested...please calm your self's down,this is no argue thread and to be honest we could all do better by having a nice cup of chat instead of mugs of insults.i have no intention to continue in such a way so write down something constructive and in answer to my quest,not your own misjudging of what you tink is going on....
come on..please

I'm sorry but I will continue to insult people who believe the earth is flat. It is idiotic.

then that implies you are not truly sorry,is it now? and if not flat then how is it?i mean,fore sure is not flat but for sure is not globular either.to think,based on not even possible true measurements(just suppositional measurements) that the moon is that distance,that the sun is this big,that the universe is so...and so on and on(we all know the story)sounds as fantastic as anything else that is not proven to the FACT.proven to the fact means that someone had experienced on "it's own skin" all that is believing .for example one that had a psychedelic experience on ayahuasca and had met the cosmic serpent which is the DNA and get his knowledge and truthfulness,can afterward storytell to the others but only his experience fellow mates can confirm approval.to the rest it is just a supposition,or the group that had the same experience can evolve it into a theory and bring some facts about and try,just try to convince the others with various results.
  but me...i am simple and easy to convince with just the right picture or video,but sadly i am strongly starting to believe there is no such thing

You are insane.