Green screen disinfo.

  • 103 Replies
  • 15757 Views
*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #90 on: November 09, 2014, 03:08:22 AM »
Here's a compilation. Now the question is: what does it take for people to wake up and see that the media is simply nothing more than a performing circus act or a magicians illusion show?
Do some of you actually need to be hit directly in the face with a big cream pie to wake you up or are you simply so brainwashed and ultra conditioned that actually being on a set of this type would still have you walking away, defending it all as real life scenarios?

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Proof TV Media 100% Fake - Fake/Green Screen Compliation (2014)

I under stand that some (a few) are simply arguing it from a devils advocate stance and that's fair enough...I can deal with you people. The ones I'm not going to give much of my time to, are the ones that just flat out deny there's anything at all, amiss, because it's simply not worth it to deal with them in any capacity.


*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #91 on: November 09, 2014, 03:21:59 AM »
You are free to take everything you are told as factual.
Except nobody is suggesting this - that is just your strawman.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

legion

  • 1593
  • +0/-0
  • You are in my VR
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #92 on: November 09, 2014, 04:40:06 AM »
You are free to take everything you are told as factual.
Except nobody is suggesting this - that is just your strawman.

Make your position clear then.
"Indoctrination [...] is often distinguished from education by the fact that the indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned".

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #93 on: November 09, 2014, 05:46:26 AM »
You are free to take everything you are told as factual.
Except nobody is suggesting this - that is just your strawman.

Make your position clear then.
How is it not clear?  Some stuff I believe, some I don't.  I look at evidence and have an open mind.

Blanket disbelief is as dumb as blanket belief.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

legion

  • 1593
  • +0/-0
  • You are in my VR
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #94 on: November 09, 2014, 06:10:10 AM »
You are free to take everything you are told as factual.
Except nobody is suggesting this - that is just your strawman.

Make your position clear then.
How is it not clear?  Some stuff I believe, some I don't.  I look at evidence and have an open mind.

Blanket disbelief is as dumb as blanket belief.

Can you give an example of something widely believed, that you don't believe?
"Indoctrination [...] is often distinguished from education by the fact that the indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned".

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #95 on: November 09, 2014, 06:14:48 AM »
You are free to take everything you are told as factual.
Except nobody is suggesting this - that is just your strawman.

Make your position clear then.
How is it not clear?  Some stuff I believe, some I don't.  I look at evidence and have an open mind.

Blanket disbelief is as dumb as blanket belief.

Can you give an example of something widely believed, that you don't believe?
A belief in the existence of a god.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

ausGeoff

  • 6091
  • +0/-0
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #96 on: November 09, 2014, 06:26:38 AM »
It's of interest that most round earthers tend to be atheists (or at least agnostics), whilst most flat earthers are young-earth creationists and/or hold a belief in the Abrahamic bible.

—Or is my viewpoint incorrect?

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #97 on: November 09, 2014, 06:31:44 AM »
It's of interest that most round earthers tend to be atheists (or at least agnostics), whilst most flat earthers are young-earth creationists and/or hold a belief in the Abrahamic bible.

—Or is my viewpoint incorrect?
Most of the actual FES members seem to be atheists actually. 
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

legion

  • 1593
  • +0/-0
  • You are in my VR
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #98 on: November 09, 2014, 06:54:41 AM »
Can you give an example of something widely believed, that you don't believe?
A belief in the existence of a god.

How very modern of you! Is that the only one?
"Indoctrination [...] is often distinguished from education by the fact that the indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned".

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #99 on: November 09, 2014, 07:19:44 AM »
Can you give an example of something widely believed, that you don't believe?
A belief in the existence of a god.

How very modern of you!
You asked, I told.


Quote
Is that the only one?
Where are you going with this?
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

ausGeoff

  • 6091
  • +0/-0
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #100 on: November 09, 2014, 12:34:11 PM »
Can you give an example of something widely believed, that you don't believe?
A belief in the existence of a god.

How very modern of you! Is that the only one?

You asked for something that was widely believed, to which Jimmy responded "a belief in God".  Why doesn't that satisfy your question?  What ulterior motive do you have for pushing this point?

Anyway... I'll give you a couple of mine:  That the 9/11 attack was an inside job set up by the US government.  That homeopathic remedies can cure illnesses.  That an alien spacecraft crashed at Roswell.  That a full moon increases the crime rate and elevates psychoses.  That mediums can communicate with the spirits of the dead.  That mobile phones can give you brain cancer.  That a cold shower and black coffee can cure a hangover.  That a hypnotist can make you cluck like a chicken.  That Kim Kardashian is a genuine celebrity.  That Adolph Hitler escaped to South America after WWII.  That antibiotics can cure influenza.  Etc.

How many do you want?

?

BJ1234

  • 1931
  • +0/-0
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #101 on: November 09, 2014, 12:57:12 PM »
I personally would like to know his definition of "widely".  How big of a percentage does it need to be to be considered widely held?

?

xaroussek

  • 3
  • +0/-0
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #102 on: November 10, 2014, 04:21:33 PM »
« Last Edit: November 10, 2014, 04:23:27 PM by xaroussek »

*

ausGeoff

  • 6091
  • +0/-0
Re: Green screen disinfo.
« Reply #103 on: November 11, 2014, 06:36:52 AM »
Here's a compilation. Now the question is: what does it take for people to wake up and see that the media is simply nothing more than a performing circus act or a magicians illusion show?
Do some of you actually need to be hit directly in the face with a big cream pie to wake you up or are you simply so brainwashed and ultra conditioned that actually being on a set of this type would still have you walking away, defending it all as real life scenarios?

LOL..... And once again our resident liar sceptimatic strikes!  What he's obviously unaware of—despite being a scientist and genius—is that "digital chroma keying" wasn't even developed in 1969 when Armstrong stepped onto the moon.  "Front screen projection" was certainly well-developed—and used frequently by Kubrick for "2001 A Space Odyssey"—but it couldn't combine the moving and variable perspectives of the actors and the screen image accurately.  Digital chroma keying can do this—as though both the background image and the actors are moving as one and recorded simultaneously by the same camera.

I'm guessing that poor old sceptimatic is blindly drawing his misinformation from conspiracy theorists such as Richard Hoagland et al.

I'm also guessing that sceptimatic wasn't even born when the first moon landing occurred, and is totally ignorant of the actual event as it unfolded on live TV, simultaneously, right across the globe.  Therefore all his opinions of the actual event are nothing more than third-party accounts.  Did he personally watch it on TV?  Obviously not.