Sceptimatics theory

Let's discuss your theory here scepti.

Question one.

Where do the stars on the ice dome come from?

Question one.

Where do the stars on the ice dome come from?

The centre of earth as light through vibrating crystals.

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:20:30 AM

Question one.

Where do the stars on the ice dome come from?

The centre of earth as light through vibrating crystals.

Can you expand on this? I don't understand.

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:26:59 AM

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:20:30 AM

Question one.

Where do the stars on the ice dome come from?

The centre of earth as light through vibrating crystals.

Can expand on this. I don't understand.

Think of a huge central crystal with an outer mass of pyramid type crystals around it, in their millions that each emit the light from the super heated centre of earth, sort of like shining small laser lights up against the ice dome as they vibrate and move around the centre of the earth.

If I have to elaborate, I'd have to draw a diagram.

So this light passes through the earth and reflects off the ice dome. That's not possible.

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:30:01 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:26:59 AM

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:20:30 AM

Question one.

Where do the stars on the ice dome come from?

The centre of earth as light through vibrating crystals.

Can expand on this. I don't understand.

Think of a huge central crystal with an outer mass of pyramid type crystals around it, in their millions that each emit the light from the super heated centre of earth, sort of like shining small laser lights up against the ice dome as they vibrate and move around the centre of the earth.

If I have to elaborate, I'd have to draw a diagram.

Considering that there is billions of stars and at least 1000's observable from anyone's perspective on a reasonably clear night then you would think that we could find the sources of these light sources as we walk around the Earth. I've never seen or heard of light emitters like this before.

So this light passes through the earth and reflects off the ice dome. That's not possible.

Explain to me why it's not possible.

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:34:47 AM

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:30:01 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:26:59 AM

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:20:30 AM

Question one.

Where do the stars on the ice dome come from?

The centre of earth as light through vibrating crystals.

Can expand on this. I don't understand.

Think of a huge central crystal with an outer mass of pyramid type crystals around it, in their millions that each emit the light from the super heated centre of earth, sort of like shining small laser lights up against the ice dome as they vibrate and move around the centre of the earth.

If I have to elaborate, I'd have to draw a diagram.

Considering that there is billions of stars and at least 1000's observable from anyone's perspective on a reasonably clear night then you would think that we could find the sources of these light sources as we walk around the Earth. I've never seen or heard of light emitters like this before.

That's because us meek, ordinary every day human beings, never get to see the whole earth. We are situated well away from the centre of the earth and well away from the outer rim. It's not surprising we see very little of things, except the effects of the reflections off of the dome and back to our eyes.

Light cannot travel through an opaque surface.

Light cannot travel through an opaque surface.

What opaque surface is this?

The earth. You are saying that the light travels through the earth.

The earth. You are saying that the light travels through the earth.

No, I've never said that.
I said that the light/heat is coming from the centre of the earth, meaning the centre circle of the earth on full show if you could get close enough to look down on it without frying, which obviously we couldn't.
The magnetic force coming from that area would render any craft useless if they got too close, anyway.
Most likely and person getting close to the stronger field created would undergo a body change in terms of molecules being altered dramatically, killing them.
Any craft would simply lose bearing and stability and crash, most likely.
Can I prove this.?Of course not.

I think what he means is that these crystals are on the surface, but they are too far out of reach. Apparently a very big earth that we are not able to fully explore with all our airplanes and technology (space travel excluded) is more plausible than a rotating sphere in the universe, just because it is too hard to believe that vacuum is not really totally empty..

Fine. Let's move on. What about gravity? What is your replacement for it?

Can I prove this.?Of course not.

Scepti, you realize you are relying on theories you cannot prove, instead of sciences that has been proven over and over through years and years of experiments, and you do this just because you think every scientist in the world is lying..

Fine. Let's move on. What about gravity? What is your replacement for it?

The universal accelerator of course. Imagine Earth's a giant pizza and and a giant Italian has taken that pizza and thrown it straight up.

On a side note, imagine a snowy day on this pizza Earth. The snow is pretty much Parmesan, sprinkling the Earth. Is it lunch yet?

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:59:35 AM

Fine. Let's move on. What about gravity? What is your replacement for it?

The universal accelerator of course. Imagine Earth's a giant pizza and and a giant Italian has taken that pizza and thrown it straight up.

On a side note, imagine a snowy day on this pizza Earth. The snow is pretty much Parmesan, sprinkling the Earth. Is it lunch yet?

Does scepti accept this?

Fine. Let's move on. What about gravity? What is your replacement for it?

Atmospheric pressure, that's all it is.
Naturally, you have to think of it with my theory. Thinking of it by using what you have been drilled into thinking, it will make no sense, because the unknown gravity force that keeps planets apart and the rotating earth in ship shape and the moon from falling onto it, is paramount to keep that alive and yet nobody questions this unknown force and why it does this amazing stuff through mass attracting mass.

Atmospheric pressure is your gravity. Everything on earth cannot work without it.

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:54:10 AM

Can I prove this.?Of course not.

Scepti, you realize you are relying on theories you cannot prove, instead of sciences that has been proven over and over through years and years of experiments, and you do this just because you think every scientist in the world is lying..

First of all, I've already said I cannot prove it. Secondly, years and years of experiments are what you are told has been done, which, if you are honest, you cannot personally verify.
Of course, you can marry up figures, but they are just the figures you have been provided with that makes this fictional globe look realistic.
Thirdly, I suspect that most genuine scientists that study the earth and what's above it, very hard will probably know that things don't add up, but what do they do?
They are paid to do as they're told or hit the road if they dare to criticise.
It's like any job in life. If you stray off the course you are set, you are punished for it in whatever way is seen fit.

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 08:59:35 AM

Fine. Let's move on. What about gravity? What is your replacement for it?

The universal accelerator of course. Imagine Earth's a giant pizza and and a giant Italian has taken that pizza and thrown it straight up.

On a side note, imagine a snowy day on this pizza Earth. The snow is pretty much Parmesan, sprinkling the Earth. Is it lunch yet?

I don't follow that theory at all.

Quote from: g el on August 16, 2013, 09:03:06 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:54:10 AM

Can I prove this.?Of course not.

Scepti, you realize you are relying on theories you cannot prove, instead of sciences that has been proven over and over through years and years of experiments, and you do this just because you think every scientist in the world is lying..

First of all, I've already said I cannot prove it. Secondly, years and years of experiments are what you are told has been done, which, if you are honest, you cannot personally verify.
Of course, you can marry up figures, but they are just the figures you have been provided with that makes this fictional globe look realistic.
Thirdly, I suspect that most genuine scientists that study the earth and what's above it, very hard will probably know that things don't add up, but what do they do?
They are paid to do as they're told or hit the road if they dare to criticise.
It's like any job in life. If you stray off the course you are set, you are punished for it in whatever way is seen fit.

So, there is no evidence that you will ever accept. Conversation over really. You will not accept evidence and the only thing that would ever convince is seeing for yourself, and you'll never do it. So, why have this pointless conversation? We should be talking about that giant pizza.

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 09:10:59 AM

Quote from: g el on August 16, 2013, 09:03:06 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:54:10 AM

Can I prove this.?Of course not.

Scepti, you realize you are relying on theories you cannot prove, instead of sciences that has been proven over and over through years and years of experiments, and you do this just because you think every scientist in the world is lying..

First of all, I've already said I cannot prove it. Secondly, years and years of experiments are what you are told has been done, which, if you are honest, you cannot personally verify.
Of course, you can marry up figures, but they are just the figures you have been provided with that makes this fictional globe look realistic.
Thirdly, I suspect that most genuine scientists that study the earth and what's above it, very hard will probably know that things don't add up, but what do they do?
They are paid to do as they're told or hit the road if they dare to criticise.
It's like any job in life. If you stray off the course you are set, you are punished for it in whatever way is seen fit.

So, there is no evidence that you will ever accept. Conversation over really. You will not accept evidence and the only thing that would ever convince is seeing for yourself, and you'll never do it. So, why have this pointless conversation? We should be talking about that giant pizza.

If it came down to physically proving something, then all conversations would be over, pertaining to space and earth's real shape.
You are free top deck out at any time.

Quote from: rottingroom on August 16, 2013, 09:13:49 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 09:10:59 AM

Quote from: g el on August 16, 2013, 09:03:06 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:54:10 AM

Can I prove this.?Of course not.

Scepti, you realize you are relying on theories you cannot prove, instead of sciences that has been proven over and over through years and years of experiments, and you do this just because you think every scientist in the world is lying..

First of all, I've already said I cannot prove it. Secondly, years and years of experiments are what you are told has been done, which, if you are honest, you cannot personally verify.
Of course, you can marry up figures, but they are just the figures you have been provided with that makes this fictional globe look realistic.
Thirdly, I suspect that most genuine scientists that study the earth and what's above it, very hard will probably know that things don't add up, but what do they do?
They are paid to do as they're told or hit the road if they dare to criticise.
It's like any job in life. If you stray off the course you are set, you are punished for it in whatever way is seen fit.

So, there is no evidence that you will ever accept. Conversation over really. You will not accept evidence and the only thing that would ever convince is seeing for yourself, and you'll never do it. So, why have this pointless conversation? We should be talking about that giant pizza.

If it came down to physically proving something, then all conversations would be over, pertaining to space and earth's real shape.
You are free top deck out at any time.

I can assure that the pizza conversation is over. I'm 100% sure that every word you say is bologna pizza. Any contribution or lack there of that I make on this dreaded pizza forum is about as important as the tobacco pizza I'm going to eat a pizz o' clock.

Ok. Back on topic please.

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 09:17:54 AM

Quote from: rottingroom on August 16, 2013, 09:13:49 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 09:10:59 AM

Quote from: g el on August 16, 2013, 09:03:06 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 08:54:10 AM

Can I prove this.?Of course not.

Scepti, you realize you are relying on theories you cannot prove, instead of sciences that has been proven over and over through years and years of experiments, and you do this just because you think every scientist in the world is lying..

First of all, I've already said I cannot prove it. Secondly, years and years of experiments are what you are told has been done, which, if you are honest, you cannot personally verify.
Of course, you can marry up figures, but they are just the figures you have been provided with that makes this fictional globe look realistic.
Thirdly, I suspect that most genuine scientists that study the earth and what's above it, very hard will probably know that things don't add up, but what do they do?
They are paid to do as they're told or hit the road if they dare to criticise.
It's like any job in life. If you stray off the course you are set, you are punished for it in whatever way is seen fit.

So, there is no evidence that you will ever accept. Conversation over really. You will not accept evidence and the only thing that would ever convince is seeing for yourself, and you'll never do it. So, why have this pointless conversation? We should be talking about that giant pizza.

If it came down to physically proving something, then all conversations would be over, pertaining to space and earth's real shape.
You are free top deck out at any time.

I can assure that the pizza conversation is over. I'm 100% sure that every word you say is bologna pizza. Any contribution or lack there of that I make on this dreaded pizza forum is about as important as the tobacco pizza I'm going to eat a pizz o' clock.

Then do me a favour. Read the topic by all means but don't take part if all you are going to do is come out with stuff like this, Fair enough?

Ok. Back on topic please.

Oh, I'm on topic. I've brought it up before. The subject of this forum, the FES, is not the shape of the Earth. There is no discussion to be made about that. The topic is Flat Earther's.

Much like if we find some Aztec bones somewhere, we may give some attention to what they studied but the subject under examination is the people themselves.

This topic is called Scepti's theory. Talking about the minds behind these conjecture's is far more to the point then giving the ideas an inch of respect.

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 09:23:11 AM

Ok. Back on topic please.

Oh, I'm on topic. I've brought it up before. The subject of this forum, the FES, is not the shape of the Earth. There is no discussion to be made about that. The topic is Flat Earther's.

Much like if we find some Aztec bones somewhere, we may give some attention to what they studied but the subject under examination is the people themselves.

This topic is called Scepti's theory. Talking about the minds behind these conjecture's is far more to the point then giving the ideas an inch of respect.

If you want to talk about my mind can you start a topic in angry ranting or the lounge or pm me.

Quote from: rottingroom on August 16, 2013, 09:27:23 AM

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 09:23:11 AM

Ok. Back on topic please.

Oh, I'm on topic. I've brought it up before. The subject of this forum, the FES, is not the shape of the Earth. There is no discussion to be made about that. The topic is Flat Earther's.

Much like if we find some Aztec bones somewhere, we may give some attention to what they studied but the subject under examination is the people themselves.

This topic is called Scepti's theory. Talking about the minds behind these conjecture's is far more to the point then giving the ideas an inch of respect.

If you want to talk about my mind can you start a topic in angry ranting or the lounge or pm me.

For once we agree on something.

Quote from: sceptimatic on August 16, 2013, 09:29:54 AM

Quote from: rottingroom on August 16, 2013, 09:27:23 AM

Quote from: REphoenix on August 16, 2013, 09:23:11 AM

Ok. Back on topic please.

Oh, I'm on topic. I've brought it up before. The subject of this forum, the FES, is not the shape of the Earth. There is no discussion to be made about that. The topic is Flat Earther's.

Much like if we find some Aztec bones somewhere, we may give some attention to what they studied but the subject under examination is the people themselves.

This topic is called Scepti's theory. Talking about the minds behind these conjecture's is far more to the point then giving the ideas an inch of respect.

If you want to talk about my mind can you start a topic in angry ranting or the lounge or pm me.

For once we agree on something.

Oh really? The idea of an ice dome and rock crystals projecting star like pictures is a topic you want to talk about?