Sure It Has Already Been Said

This is based on your crazy USSR Cold War argument.
Okay, so if you are on the internet at all you know of Chris Hadfield's photos of the Earth that he took from orbit. They show a round Earth. He is part of the Canadian Space Agency. That came into authority in 1990. Not only that, but the amazing amount of photos could not be edited fast enough at the rate he was posting them. He is also not a lunatic who would want to cover up this stuff.
Honestly, you are just a bunch of conspiracy theorists who want to cause a row and seem important. Luckily I am just watching random Youtube videos so I am not wasting any time that would be important otherwise.
Thanks for the laughs though. You are quite amusing with your ignorance.
P.S. If you say I am ignorant for ignoring your USSR conspiracy theory, then you really must be off the far end.

the amazing amount of photos could not be edited fast enough at the rate he was posting them.

I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing here.  They wouldn't be editing their photos while they were being posted.  It would be much simpler to edit them all ahead of time.

You reek of arrogance, man. When's the last time you've taken a shower?

Not only that, but the amazing amount of photos could not be edited fast enough at the rate he was posting them.

Not believing in a flat Earth, I can believe.  But not believing in special effects?  That takes a special kind of skeptic.

Benjamin, there is no conspiracy too large for these people, regardless of the lack of evidence. If it contradicts the idea of a Flat Earth it is fake.

Quote from: Saddam Hussein on June 18, 2013, 08:55:01 PM

Quote from: Benjamin589 on June 18, 2013, 08:01:34 PM

the amazing amount of photos could not be edited fast enough at the rate he was posting them.

I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing here.  They wouldn't be editing their photos while they were being posted.  It would be much simpler to edit them all ahead of time.

Got any evidence to support this wild accusation? I thought not.

Got any evidence to counter this claim?  I thought not.

Quote from: Stabbald on June 19, 2013, 02:27:31 AM

Quote from: Saddam Hussein on June 18, 2013, 08:55:01 PM

Quote from: Benjamin589 on June 18, 2013, 08:01:34 PM

the amazing amount of photos could not be edited fast enough at the rate he was posting them.

I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing here.  They wouldn't be editing their photos while they were being posted.  It would be much simpler to edit them all ahead of time.

Got any evidence to support this wild accusation? I thought not.

Got any evidence to counter this claim?  I thought not.

How does one counter an unsupported claim?

Quote from: Saddam Hussein on June 18, 2013, 08:55:01 PM

Quote from: Benjamin589 on June 18, 2013, 08:01:34 PM

the amazing amount of photos could not be edited fast enough at the rate he was posting them.

I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing here.  They wouldn't be editing their photos while they were being posted.  It would be much simpler to edit them all ahead of time.

Got any evidence to support this wild accusation? I thought not.

What accusation?  He was implying that the conspiracy would be editing photos while Hatfield was posting them, as if they needed to "keep up" with his rate of posting.  I simply used logic to counter his assumption and pointed out that's not what the conspiracy would do.