You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.
I'm just often wrong.
I'm bench pressing body builders in the gym.
69
Quote from: hoppy on June 11, 2013, 05:30:19 PM69 I prefer 34.5. Doesn't disturb the reading of a good book.
I like the golden ratio, (1+5^(1/2))/2.But the most important number has to be c, because it's the only one that's inherently meaningful.
Quote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 11:47:54 AMI like the golden ratio, (1+5^(1/2))/2.But the most important number has to be c, because it's the only one that's inherently meaningful.c is subject to relativity. you were correct the first time. The golden ratio is the single most important number in the universe. More so than even pi.
Quote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 11:47:54 AMI like the golden ratio, (1+5^(1/2))/2.But the most important number has to be c, because it's the only one that's inherently meaningful.Are you suggesting that e is not meaningful?
Quote from: Ævan on June 12, 2013, 12:33:13 PMQuote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 11:47:54 AMI like the golden ratio, (1+5^(1/2))/2.But the most important number has to be c, because it's the only one that's inherently meaningful.c is subject to relativity. you were correct the first time. The golden ratio is the single most important number in the universe. More so than even pi.Exactly. c is subject to relativity such that it is the only real constant in physics. No matter what your frame of reference, c is the same.
Quote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 12:37:18 PMQuote from: Ævan on June 12, 2013, 12:33:13 PMQuote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 11:47:54 AMI like the golden ratio, (1+5^(1/2))/2.But the most important number has to be c, because it's the only one that's inherently meaningful.c is subject to relativity. you were correct the first time. The golden ratio is the single most important number in the universe. More so than even pi.Exactly. c is subject to relativity such that it is the only real constant in physics. No matter what your frame of reference, c is the same.How can c be the only real constant? Time isn't constant and c is a speed ... subject to time and I think but would need to confirm also temperature but I think that's because temperature is a variable of time. One might also argue distance is a variable regarding space bending etc but again that could be because time changes and that's used to measure large distances. Anyway c is meaningless. The golden ratio really is always the same under all conditions. That ones a keeper.
Meat me
i was just swallowing it whole no problem.
Quote from: Ævan on June 12, 2013, 12:46:20 PMQuote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 12:37:18 PMQuote from: Ævan on June 12, 2013, 12:33:13 PMQuote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 11:47:54 AMI like the golden ratio, (1+5^(1/2))/2.But the most important number has to be c, because it's the only one that's inherently meaningful.c is subject to relativity. you were correct the first time. The golden ratio is the single most important number in the universe. More so than even pi.Exactly. c is subject to relativity such that it is the only real constant in physics. No matter what your frame of reference, c is the same.How can c be the only real constant? Time isn't constant and c is a speed ... subject to time and I think but would need to confirm also temperature but I think that's because temperature is a variable of time. One might also argue distance is a variable regarding space bending etc but again that could be because time changes and that's used to measure large distances. Anyway c is meaningless. The golden ratio really is always the same under all conditions. That ones a keeper.That's how relativity works. Other variables, such as time and length, change in order to keep c at the same value relative to the observer. People from any two frames of reference will get different values for time, but their value for c will be exactly the same. The golden ratio isn't even always the case.
Tausami is correct. The speed of light never changes, no matter how much you modify other variables. The speed of light is the only true constant in the universe.
The SI definition of c makes certain assumptions about the laws of physics. For example, they assume that the particle of light, the photon, is massless. If the photon had a small rest mass, the SI definition of the metre would become meaningless because the speed of light would change as a function of its wavelength. They could not just define it to be constant. They would have to fix the definition of the metre by stating which colour of light was being used. It should also be noted that the value of c is wholly dependant on Einstein's theory of relativity being correct. And that thing has been battered to bits in recent years.http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-First-Test-That-Proves-General-Theory-of-Relativity-Wrong-20259.shtml
Quote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 12:50:34 PMQuote from: Ævan on June 12, 2013, 12:46:20 PMQuote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 12:37:18 PMQuote from: Ævan on June 12, 2013, 12:33:13 PMQuote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 11:47:54 AMI like the golden ratio, (1+5^(1/2))/2.But the most important number has to be c, because it's the only one that's inherently meaningful.c is subject to relativity. you were correct the first time. The golden ratio is the single most important number in the universe. More so than even pi.Exactly. c is subject to relativity such that it is the only real constant in physics. No matter what your frame of reference, c is the same.How can c be the only real constant? Time isn't constant and c is a speed ... subject to time and I think but would need to confirm also temperature but I think that's because temperature is a variable of time. One might also argue distance is a variable regarding space bending etc but again that could be because time changes and that's used to measure large distances. Anyway c is meaningless. The golden ratio really is always the same under all conditions. That ones a keeper.That's how relativity works. Other variables, such as time and length, change in order to keep c at the same value relative to the observer. People from any two frames of reference will get different values for time, but their value for c will be exactly the same. The golden ratio isn't even always the case.How on earth does the golden ratio ever change? Its a ratio. Not a physical quantity. It cannot change. That's why its used so extensively in nature and the physical universe. I'm going to ignore your comments on 'c'. Its just one of those arguments where I'm right and you are wrong and I'll end up wasting lots of time providing you with sources for something that ultimately neither of us care about.
I'm going to ignore your ignorance of special relativity
Quote from: Tausami on June 12, 2013, 02:53:45 PMI'm going to ignore your ignorance of special relativityhttp://www.finaltheories.com/structure%20and%20composition/special%20relativity/SR%20is%20wrong.html
It's no slur if it's fact.
No gas constant, I am disappoint.
Anyway, it's not that the golden ratio changes, it's that it's not always accurate. Due to various reasons it can be replaced by Lucas numbers or even whole numbers in certain situations.
Quote from: spanner34.5 on June 12, 2013, 06:29:07 AMQuote from: hoppy on June 11, 2013, 05:30:19 PM69 I prefer 34.5. Doesn't disturb the reading of a good book.How the hell do you concentrate?