We're not literally claiming that the Earth is egg-shaped. The purpose of that article is to criticize the evidence for RET supposedly offered by those photographs, and the title is just an attempt to add some humor.
There isn't any particular article in there. It's a title with some pictures of the earth showing curvature. Hence the reason for my using the word "page" instead of "article".
They don't know that the Earth is flat because they haven't been to space, and they haven't been to space because they're keeping the money for themselves. The FAQ apparently needs some revision.
The FAQ and wiki do indeed need some revision, as many people come in with questions based on that FAQ and then are told their questions are already asked frequently. For a "Frequently-Asked-Questions" page, it doesn't do a very good job of answering them. The wiki isn't much better in providing logic-based and clear answers. Many people on this forum openly disagree with parts of the wiki pages (as FE-ers) and have chastised people. Perhaps it can be edited to acknowledge the dissent among the ranks of FE-ers as well as noting that they are not definitive on the subject, are constantly changed, and are frequently not worked out fully or even much at all. I'm not saying this because I'm a RE-er, but based on the constant contradictions in what FE-ers have said on this forum. I'm sure you're aware of them.
As head editor, I'm open to suggestions for further questions to add to the FAQ
Awesome! I would like to submit the following for your consideration:
1) If the Earth is actually flat, why has no one noticed that the distance between longitude lines continue to increase as you head South past the equator.
2) How does FE explain Foucault pendulums?
3) Are FE believers aware that any curved surface will appear to be flat when viewed in a small enough reference frame and if so, why do they insist on using "Look outside" as evidence?
4) How does FE explain the tides? Rowbotham attempted to do this with a FE model but failed miserably.
5) Can use of the FE model accurately predict celestial events? If it can, why has no FE believer put forth work in this area?
6) If FE believer's claim to base their beliefs on simple observations, why does the "Bendy Light Theory" exist? It's very existence goes against the principals of believing in only that which can be simply observed.