What evidence is needed?

They don't want nor need any proof, as they actually do believe the Earth is round like everyone. They're here for trolling purpose, no more, no less.

So since you flat-earthers do not believe pictures, as "all of them are photoshopped", don't  believe videos "because they're all taken with fish-eye lenses", and ignore mathematical/ logical proof, my question to you is; what evidence of a RE will you believe? I will be sure to provide evidence by whatever means you wish.

So since you flat-earthers do not believe pictures, as "all of them are photoshopped", don't  believe videos "because they're all taken with fish-eye lenses", and ignore mathematical/ logical proof, my question to you is; what evidence of a RE will you believe? I will be sure to provide evidence by whatever means you wish.

I can also say that even if you could find a proof against [flat-earth theory], you would get no posts from FEers.

Quote from: Zurian on November 17, 2012, 12:20:58 PM

So since you flat-earthers do not believe pictures, as "all of them are photoshopped", don't  believe videos "because they're all taken with fish-eye lenses", and ignore mathematical/ logical proof, my question to you is; what evidence of a RE will you believe? I will be sure to provide evidence by whatever means you wish.

There are many proofs in Earth Not a Globe, it can be found in the Information Repository from the main forum menu.

Quote from: hoppy on November 18, 2012, 06:03:48 AM

Quote from: Zurian on November 17, 2012, 12:20:58 PM

So since you flat-earthers do not believe pictures, as "all of them are photoshopped", don't  believe videos "because they're all taken with fish-eye lenses", and ignore mathematical/ logical proof, my question to you is; what evidence of a RE will you believe? I will be sure to provide evidence by whatever means you wish.

There are many proofs in Earth Not a Globe, it can be found in the Information Repository from the main forum menu.

I find this very telling, Hoppy didn't answer the original question. In jeopardy style he answered the question "what evidence do you have the earth is flat" rather than the original question.

There is a "theory" that some people believe that the earth is flat, what evidence would it take to change this view?

Quote from: cartwheelnurd on November 17, 2012, 08:46:04 PM

I can also say that even if you could find a proof against [flat-earth theory], you would get no posts from FEers.

This quote is very telling off how tenuous round-earth theory really is. People have been coming here for years trying to prove us wrong and guess what? Go ahead guess. That's right, her we still are.

Quote from: Zurian on November 17, 2012, 12:20:58 PM

So since you flat-earthers do not believe pictures, as "all of them are photoshopped", don't  believe videos "because they're all taken with fish-eye lenses", and ignore mathematical/ logical proof, my question to you is; what evidence of a RE will you believe? I will be sure to provide evidence by whatever means you wish.

There are many proofs in Earth Not a Globe, it can be found in the Information Repository from the main forum menu.

If other scientists findings aren't accepted why is this man's findings accepted?

Quote from: Pongo on November 18, 2012, 11:37:56 AM

Quote from: cartwheelnurd on November 17, 2012, 08:46:04 PM

I can also say that even if you could find a proof against [flat-earth theory], you would get no posts from FEers.

This quote is very telling off how tenuous round-earth theory really is. People have been coming here for years trying to prove us wrong and guess what? Go ahead guess. That's right, her we still are.

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

Quote from: Pongo on November 18, 2012, 11:37:56 AM

Quote from: cartwheelnurd on November 17, 2012, 08:46:04 PM

I can also say that even if you could find a proof against [flat-earth theory], you would get no posts from FEers.

This quote is very telling off how tenuous round-earth theory really is. People have been coming here for years trying to prove us wrong and guess what? Go ahead guess. That's right, her we still are.

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

Markjo, LordDave, Nomad, Mugsy, Saddam, Wakka Wakka, Supertails, SCG do I need to go on?

Quote from: Beorn on November 19, 2012, 04:10:49 PM

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

Quote from: Pongo on November 18, 2012, 11:37:56 AM

Quote from: cartwheelnurd on November 17, 2012, 08:46:04 PM

I can also say that even if you could find a proof against [flat-earth theory], you would get no posts from FEers.

This quote is very telling off how tenuous round-earth theory really is. People have been coming here for years trying to prove us wrong and guess what? Go ahead guess. That's right, her we still are.

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

Markjo, LordDave, Nomad, Mugsy, Saddam, Wakka Wakka, Supertails, SCG do I need to go on?

I've only seen one or two of these in the debating fora. The rest are enjoying themselves in the other boards.

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 19, 2012, 04:16:34 PM

Quote from: Beorn on November 19, 2012, 04:10:49 PM

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

Quote from: Pongo on November 18, 2012, 11:37:56 AM

Quote from: cartwheelnurd on November 17, 2012, 08:46:04 PM

I can also say that even if you could find a proof against [flat-earth theory], you would get no posts from FEers.

This quote is very telling off how tenuous round-earth theory really is. People have been coming here for years trying to prove us wrong and guess what? Go ahead guess. That's right, her we still are.

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

Markjo, LordDave, Nomad, Mugsy, Saddam, Wakka Wakka, Supertails, SCG do I need to go on?

I've only seen one or two of these in the debating fora. The rest are enjoying themselves in the other boards.

Ah so you just worded your question poorly. Got it.

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

If only.  There have actually been quite a few REers who have posted here for hours a day, months on end, in an apparent attempt to undo the damage they perceive us to be doing to society.  Of course none of them has been able to prove that the Earth is round.

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

Quote from: Pongo on November 18, 2012, 11:37:56 AM

Quote from: cartwheelnurd on November 17, 2012, 08:46:04 PM

I can also say that even if you could find a proof against [flat-earth theory], you would get no posts from FEers.

This quote is very telling off how tenuous round-earth theory really is. People have been coming here for years trying to prove us wrong and guess what? Go ahead guess. That's right, her we still are.

Sadaam is a spherical earth believer??? 

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

Markjo, LordDave, Nomad, Mugsy, Saddam, Wakka Wakka, Supertails, SCG do I need to go on?

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 19, 2012, 05:07:45 PM

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

If only.  There have actually been quite a few REers who have posted here for hours a day, months on end, in an apparent attempt to undo the damage they perceive us to be doing to society.  Of course none of them has been able to prove that the Earth is round.

That's because the good points brought up are left unanswered. As a matter of fact, there are a few on the front pages of the 3 main boards I'm intently watching.

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 19, 2012, 05:07:45 PM

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

If only.  There have actually been quite a few REers who have posted here for hours a day, months on end, in an apparent attempt to undo the damage they perceive us to be doing to society.  Of course none of them has been able to prove that the Earth is round.

That's because the good points brought up are left unanswered. As a matter of fact, there are a few on the front pages of the 3 main boards I'm intently watching.

Show new replies to your posts.

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 19, 2012, 05:11:21 PM

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 19, 2012, 05:07:45 PM

Quote from: burdenofproof on November 18, 2012, 03:45:20 PM

How many REers have been here since the beginning? Not many, I'll bet, because they see that spending time here arguing is a tremendous waste of energy.

If only.  There have actually been quite a few REers who have posted here for hours a day, months on end, in an apparent attempt to undo the damage they perceive us to be doing to society.  Of course none of them has been able to prove that the Earth is round.

That's because the good points brought up are left unanswered. As a matter of fact, there are a few on the front pages of the 3 main boards I'm intently watching.

Just do a forum search for your answers. I've been here for almost seven years and the same topics are debated again and again and again. If a question seems to be unanswered it's only because you haven't searched hard enough.

Simple. Prove that all those "scientists" that talk about having evidence for a RE are unbiased and are not influenced by the conspirators in governmental organizations. Prove that the fish-eye lenses are inadequate to discredit the videos. Prove that the light  doesn't bend in such a way to provide the illusion of a round earth. Show us that the Ice wall doesn't work the way that it does, and that the guards patrolling it aren't there in reality. In short, disprove the FE. Of course, you can't do any of that.

Quote from: Science on November 20, 2012, 06:53:59 AM

Simple. Prove that all those "scientists" that talk about having evidence for a RE are unbiased and are not influenced by the conspirators in governmental organizations. Prove that the fish-eye lenses are inadequate to discredit the videos. Prove that the light  doesn't bend in such a way to provide the illusion of a round earth. Show us that the Ice wall doesn't work the way that it does, and that the guards patrolling it aren't there in reality. In short, disprove the FE. Of course, you can't do any of that.

The question is not how can we disprove all the wacko FE theories, its what evidence of a round earth will you accept. I think your answer proves the obvious: there is no evidence FE proponents will accept that will change their mind.

Simple. Prove that all those "scientists" that talk about having evidence for a RE are unbiased and are not influenced by the conspirators in governmental organizations. Prove that the fish-eye lenses are inadequate to discredit the videos. Prove that the light  doesn't bend in such a way to provide the illusion of a round earth. Show us that the Ice wall doesn't work the way that it does, and that the guards patrolling it aren't there in reality. In short, disprove the FE. Of course, you can't do any of that.

Quote from: Science on November 20, 2012, 06:53:59 AM

Simple. Prove that all those "scientists" that talk about having evidence for a RE are unbiased and are not influenced by the conspirators in governmental organizations. Prove that the fish-eye lenses are inadequate to discredit the videos. Prove that the light  doesn't bend in such a way to provide the illusion of a round earth. Show us that the Ice wall doesn't work the way that it does, and that the guards patrolling it aren't there in reality. In short, disprove the FE. Of course, you can't do any of that.

You can take this and turn it round.
Prove there is a global (for lack of a better word) conspiracy
Prove that light does bend by the orders of magnitude etc required
Prove the ice wall exists at all
Prove that gravity doesn't exist
Prove bigfoot does/doesn't exist (depending on your view)

It's not worth taking that road, you must be able to come up with something tangible, short of going into space.