Techgnosticism

  • 64 Replies
  • 17449 Views
?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #30 on: November 30, 2011, 03:15:14 AM »
And can you account for the inevitable reversal of the polarity of the neutron flow?
Wait...
What if he found a way to fold the neutron waveform along a geodesic hyper sphere along the 8th, 22nd, and 232nd axes?  That would solve the polarity reversal while maintaining resolution integrity to pass though the subspace layer at the 255th fractal permeation.

I was thinking that he could use a bioelectric dampening field with a retrogressive arc inversion. Of course, that brings in the issue of macro transmission of a k-field wavelength blocking the self-replicating semi-bifold matrix, but I suspect he could deal with that fairly easily.
Yeah, if you want to fry the nadion field and rip apart the sub-conscious.  If you want to do that, you need to reinforce the nadion field with a refractive incursion wave of core energy directed through the sub-conscious fractal reality.  That'll stabilize the nadion field and keep your sub-conscious intact.

I'm not entirely certain, but I think they're trying to communicate with each other!
I'm fluent in gibberish. :p
Gone.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #31 on: November 30, 2011, 03:17:18 AM »
I'm fluent in talking to myself. :p
Bloody samefag.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #32 on: November 30, 2011, 03:29:21 AM »
I'm fluent in talking to myself. :p
Bloody samefag.
Seriously? That's the best you've got? Come on now PP, you know me better than that.
Gone.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #33 on: November 30, 2011, 03:31:55 AM »
Seriously? That's the best you've got?
I don't see you proving me wrong.

you know me better than that.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2011, 04:05:37 AM by PizzaPlanet »
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

Wendy

  • 18427
  • +0/-0
  • I laugh cus you fake
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #34 on: November 30, 2011, 04:03:52 AM »
A great troll took place here. I can sense it.
Here's an explanation for ya. Lurk moar. Every single point you brought up has been posted, reposted, debated and debunked. There is a search function on this forum, and it is very easy to use.

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #35 on: November 30, 2011, 04:04:24 AM »
Nice try PP.
Gone.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #36 on: November 30, 2011, 04:04:52 AM »
Try? It was thoroughly successful.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #37 on: November 30, 2011, 04:06:34 AM »
Try? It was thoroughly successful.
What was?
Gone.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #38 on: November 30, 2011, 04:07:29 AM »
Try? It was thoroughly successful.
What was?
I dunno, you're the one who started talking about a "nice try".
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #39 on: November 30, 2011, 04:15:49 AM »
Try? It was thoroughly successful.
What was?
I dunno, you're the one who started talking about a "nice try".

Then I guess I was wrong.

Fail dude.
Gone.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #40 on: November 30, 2011, 04:16:48 AM »
Then I guess I was wrong.

Fail dude.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

Wendy

  • 18427
  • +0/-0
  • I laugh cus you fake
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #41 on: November 30, 2011, 04:19:11 AM »
We all know what happened here. Pizzaplanet deserves a full 100 day bam.
Here's an explanation for ya. Lurk moar. Every single point you brought up has been posted, reposted, debated and debunked. There is a search function on this forum, and it is very easy to use.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #42 on: November 30, 2011, 04:20:33 AM »
Why? Because Lorddave posted obscenities and then deleted them?
How irrational.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

Wendy

  • 18427
  • +0/-0
  • I laugh cus you fake
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #43 on: November 30, 2011, 04:21:57 AM »
We know...
Here's an explanation for ya. Lurk moar. Every single point you brought up has been posted, reposted, debated and debunked. There is a search function on this forum, and it is very easy to use.

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #44 on: November 30, 2011, 06:47:03 AM »
Wait, I'm confused. If the hyper-dimensional fractals of the neuro-conscious waveform are refracted by the radon field then how does one explain the gluon-dispersion patterns registered by the heisenberg-displaced tachyon grid? Surely a better and more coherent explanation is that the matrix itself is suspended in a non-stable ion-positron 'aether' set at equal vertices along the hyperspatial grid (Which would go some way to explaining the relative lack of cherenkhov radiation measured by instruments monitoring the consciousness-flow between the matrix and the non-suspended tangental matrices.)

?

Blanko

  • 7161
  • +0/-0
  • Terrorist
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #45 on: November 30, 2011, 06:57:26 AM »
Wait, I'm confused. If the hyper-dimensional fractals of the neuro-conscious waveform are refracted by the radon field then how does one explain the gluon-dispersion patterns registered by the heisenberg-displaced tachyon grid? Surely a better and more coherent explanation is that the matrix itself is suspended in a non-stable ion-positron 'aether' set at equal vertices along the hyperspatial grid (Which would go some way to explaining the relative lack of cherenkhov radiation measured by instruments monitoring the consciousness-flow between the matrix and the non-suspended tangental matrices.)

Thanks, now my mind is scattered in billion pieces all around the fucking non-stable ion-positron hyper-dimensional neuro-conscious hyperspatial matrix.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52344
  • +97/-90
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #46 on: November 30, 2011, 08:06:24 AM »
Didn't you read the disclaimer? You myst hold your mind together.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

?

Blanko

  • 7161
  • +0/-0
  • Terrorist
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #47 on: November 30, 2011, 08:10:25 AM »
Didn't you read the disclaimer? You myst hold your mind together.

It was too tl;dr

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #48 on: November 30, 2011, 08:25:58 AM »
Wait, I'm confused. If the hyper-dimensional fractals of the neuro-conscious waveform are refracted by the radon field then how does one explain the gluon-dispersion patterns registered by the heisenberg-displaced tachyon grid? Surely a better and more coherent explanation is that the matrix itself is suspended in a non-stable ion-positron 'aether' set at equal vertices along the hyperspatial grid (Which would go some way to explaining the relative lack of cherenkhov radiation measured by instruments monitoring the consciousness-flow between the matrix and the non-suspended tangental matrices.)

Nadeon not radon. That's why you're confused.
Gone.

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6758
  • +0/-0
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #49 on: November 30, 2011, 07:31:36 PM »
And can you account for the inevitable reversal of the polarity of the neutron flow?
Wait...
What if he found a way to fold the neutron waveform along a geodesic hyper sphere along the 8th, 22nd, and 232nd axes?  That would solve the polarity reversal while maintaining resolution integrity to pass though the subspace layer at the 255th fractal permeation.

I was thinking that he could use a bioelectric dampening field with a retrogressive arc inversion. Of course, that brings in the issue of macro transmission of a k-field wavelength blocking the self-replicating semi-bifold matrix, but I suspect he could deal with that fairly easily.
Yeah, if you want to fry the nadion field and rip apart the sub-conscious.  If you want to do that, you need to reinforce the nadion field with a refractive incursion wave of core energy directed through the sub-conscious fractal reality.  That'll stabilize the nadion field and keep your sub-conscious intact.

That was part of the 'deal with that fairly easily'. And besides, it's better than causing a localized, non-corrosive amalgamation of asynchronous space independently occurring in restricted condition mode, like you're plan would. You'd need to use an immensely powerful rotating magnetic field to focus a narrow beam of gravitons, which in turn would fold-space time consistent with Weyl tensor dynamics until the space curvature becomes so infinitely large that you produce a singularity to fix that, and that would make the resublimated thiotimoline deposite, and you'd have to start all over again.

?

Vongeo

  • Official Member
  • 5972
  • +0/-0
  • I don't get it either.
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #50 on: November 30, 2011, 08:40:48 PM »
But if one were to quantify the sub-matrix in a digital form, one must account for the bi-polarization of the quantum field on the organic neurological wave pattern.
Oh I SEE LORD DAVE! you read all this, but when I post Ender's game with the ctrl f function to replace Pizza planet into it you don't even try and read it. Jeez i feel like I'm Simon Phoenix
Vongeo is a wanker, he wears a wanker hat; he always smells like urine and he thinks the Earth is flat.

No longer is this sentence is cut in half. Jekra!

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #51 on: December 01, 2011, 02:41:32 AM »
But if one were to quantify the sub-matrix in a digital form, one must account for the bi-polarization of the quantum field on the organic neurological wave pattern.
Oh I SEE LORD DAVE! you read all this, but when I post Ender's game with the ctrl f function to replace Pizza planet into it you don't even try and read it. Jeez i feel like I'm Simon Phoenix
Who said I read what Ryan has posted?
Gone.

*

EnigmaZV

  • 3459
  • +0/-0
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #52 on: December 01, 2011, 06:43:18 AM »
But if one were to quantify the sub-matrix in a digital form, one must account for the bi-polarization of the quantum field on the organic neurological wave pattern.
Oh I SEE LORD DAVE! you read all this, but when I post Ender's game with the ctrl f function to replace Pizza planet into it you don't even try and read it. Jeez i feel like I'm Simon Phoenix
Who said I read what Ryan has posted?

You did.
I don't know what you're implying, but you're probably wrong.

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #53 on: December 01, 2011, 07:41:14 AM »
But if one were to quantify the sub-matrix in a digital form, one must account for the bi-polarization of the quantum field on the organic neurological wave pattern.
Oh I SEE LORD DAVE! you read all this, but when I post Ender's game with the ctrl f function to replace Pizza planet into it you don't even try and read it. Jeez i feel like I'm Simon Phoenix
Who said I read what Ryan has posted?

You did.
Well I didn't read his latest stuff. Just the posts that said " reserved".
Gone.

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6758
  • +0/-0
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #54 on: December 01, 2011, 11:36:28 AM »
But if one were to quantify the sub-matrix in a digital form, one must account for the bi-polarization of the quantum field on the organic neurological wave pattern.
Oh I SEE LORD DAVE! you read all this, but when I post Ender's game with the ctrl f function to replace Pizza planet into it you don't even try and read it. Jeez i feel like I'm Simon Phoenix
Who said I read what Ryan has posted?

You did.
Well I didn't read his latest stuff. Just the posts that said " reserved".

Have you actually been writing all of that?

?

Ryan Onessence

  • 325
  • +0/-0
  • All and neither; make of it what you will
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #55 on: December 01, 2011, 12:33:01 PM »
You really ought to read disclaimers guys. This is not a joke. It could hurt your head
http://soundcloud.com/orin-zolis/sets/world-music-ethnic-beats/

Knowledge gained via academic means and intelligence are not mutually inclusive. Those who assume authority and superiority over conventionally uneducated persons would be wiser to keep this in mind.

?

jraffield1

  • 697
  • +0/-0
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #56 on: December 01, 2011, 12:35:30 PM »
You really ought to read disclaimers guys. This is not a joke. It could hurt your head

Lol, nothing you have posted has the power to hurt people's heads  ::) .
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #57 on: December 01, 2011, 01:37:02 PM »
But if one were to quantify the sub-matrix in a digital form, one must account for the bi-polarization of the quantum field on the organic neurological wave pattern.
Oh I SEE LORD DAVE! you read all this, but when I post Ender's game with the ctrl f function to replace Pizza planet into it you don't even try and read it. Jeez i feel like I'm Simon Phoenix
Who said I read what Ryan has posted?

You did.
Well I didn't read his latest stuff. Just the posts that said " reserved".

Have you actually been writing all of that?
Negative.


You really ought to read disclaimers guys. This is not a joke. It could hurt your head
Seriously?
I just admitted that everything I wrote, which you yourself said is close to what you mean "in a nutshell", was complete and intentional jibberish.

So if what I wrote was intentionally jibberish and you said it's what you wrote "in a nutshell", then what you wrote is also jibberish "in a nutshell".

It's YOU who need the disclaimer.  It's clear you can't accept what we're telling you.
Gone.

?

Ryan Onessence

  • 325
  • +0/-0
  • All and neither; make of it what you will
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #58 on: December 01, 2011, 01:47:14 PM »
Reality is a mirror of yourself, what you project is a reflection of how you yourselves are interpreting what you know. If u wanted me to belive you werent effected by this u would have been wiser to simply. Say nothing.... Good day
http://soundcloud.com/orin-zolis/sets/world-music-ethnic-beats/

Knowledge gained via academic means and intelligence are not mutually inclusive. Those who assume authority and superiority over conventionally uneducated persons would be wiser to keep this in mind.

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Techgnosticism
« Reply #59 on: December 01, 2011, 02:00:22 PM »
Reality is a mirror of yourself, what you project is a reflection of how you yourselves are interpreting what you know. If u wanted me to belive you werent effected by this u would have been wiser to simply. Say nothing.... Good day
First off, reality is not a mirror of yourself.  If it was, reality would be so fucked up with everyone's "mirror" that there would be no facts.  Ever.

Secondly, what I do is not a reflection of how I am interpreting what I know, it is a result of interpreting what I know. 
Finally:
I didn't say I wasn't affected.  Every sensory input we receive affects us in some way.  For example, your writings make me laugh and giggle.  It also fills me with a drive to prove to you that everything you write is complete and utter jibberish.
Gone.