Where did the shuttle go?

Quote from: sf876 on September 06, 2011, 08:00:55 PM

Why don't you FErs go to NASAs website,   Find out when the ISS is going to be passing by your area and then go borrow a telescope,  and take a look for yourself.   If the sky is clear,  you can see it plain as day.   I've seen it several times.   It's not like it's hiding.  Anyone with a brain and a half decent telescope can go look at it.

Nonsense, that's just a holographic projection.

By psychic moonshrimp I'm assuming?

Please move the discussion to RM.

By psychic moonshrimp I'm assuming?

Now, you're getting it.

Everything that explains their FET is so extremely convoluted and all the simple straightforward science and just about everything that could possibly prove it wrong is just a conspiracy to make you spend money. Who can argue with that kinda logic?

Quote from: Ski on September 05, 2011, 02:51:43 PM

Amateur "space photographers" are nearly as competitive as bird watchers. I'm sure there are manufactured claims. I see no reason that everyone who looks at the sky is in on the conspiracy.

Bird watchers fake photos of birds..??  that's news to me.

Bird watchers invent sightings the way fishermen invent fish tales. The one-upmanship continues here with "space" photographers.

Quote from: pitdroidtech on September 06, 2011, 07:54:02 PM

Quote from: Ski on September 05, 2011, 02:51:43 PM

Amateur "space photographers" are nearly as competitive as bird watchers. I'm sure there are manufactured claims. I see no reason that everyone who looks at the sky is in on the conspiracy.

Bird watchers fake photos of birds..??  that's news to me.

Bird watchers invent sightings the way fishermen invent fish tales. The one-upmanship continues here with "space" photographers.

These pictures/videos are a little more than fish tales.

Basically, you are saying that these people, especially the ones at the clay institute are liars and good photoshopers. They all take NASA's model of the ISS/shuttle, and then photoshop it from different angles to create images and movies. They also add in noise to make it seem real (for atmospheric distortion).

In other words, they are each part of a one or two man conspiracy. And no evidence presented.
Does FE even have an idea of what the people could be photographing if they are (as is likely) telling the truth?
Take out a telescope if you are still in doubt.

Take out a telescope if you are still in doubt.

I have viewed these "satellites" scores of times with binoculars, and they are only discernible as blobs of light. How one can take a leap of faith to conclude they man-made objects in some sort of mythical perpetual free-fall where an object falls but yet does not fall, is insensible to me.

Quote from: momentia on September 06, 2011, 10:16:04 PM

Take out a telescope if you are still in doubt.

I have viewed these "satellites" scores of times with binoculars, and they are only discernible as blobs of light. How one can take a leap of faith to conclude they man-made objects in some sort of mythical perpetual free-fall where an object falls but yet does not fall, is insensible to me.

Well, get a good telescope, tracking software, and make a quality video. Then choose the frames that are the sharpest. You still are claiming photoshop/conspiracy on all of these images and videos.

umm question. who has actually seen the ice wall??? and can i see a pic of it...

Quote from: momentia on September 06, 2011, 10:16:04 PM

Take out a telescope if you are still in doubt.

I have viewed these "satellites" scores of times with binoculars, and they are only discernible as blobs of light. How one can take a leap of faith to conclude they man-made objects in some sort of mythical perpetual free-fall where an object falls but yet does not fall, is insensible to me.

Nice trolling...

mythical perpetual free-fall where an object falls but yet does not fall, is insensible to me.

Why you hatin' on FET, have you recently converted?