Disprove RET

  • 80 Replies
  • 15819 Views
?

RoundEarths

  • 59
  • +0/-0
Disprove RET
« on: June 26, 2011, 01:19:31 PM »
Since we round earthers tend to disprove many of flat earthen theory i would like to give them a chance to disprove RET. Please post evidence that the earth cannot be round for (insert reason here). Mind you these reasons must be able to be fact checked and not some magic equation you wrote down while watching opera.

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6758
  • +0/-0
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2011, 02:25:35 PM »
Since we round earthers tend to disprove many of flat earthen theory i would like to give them a chance to disprove RET. Please post evidence that the earth cannot be round for (insert reason here). Mind you these reasons must be able to be fact checked and not some magic equation you wrote down while watching opera.

Sure.

1) Look out your window

2) The Bedford Level Experiment.

?

be cool

  • 39
  • +0/-0
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2011, 03:04:19 PM »
Since we round earthers tend to disprove many of flat earthen theory i would like to give them a chance to disprove RET. Please post evidence that the earth cannot be round for (insert reason here). Mind you these reasons must be able to be fact checked and not some magic equation you wrote down while watching opera.

Sure.

1) Look out your window

2) The Bedford Level Experiment.

1) well that's faulty logic. if you lived on top of a mountain and looked outside your window, you'd think that the world descends in all directions. it's the bigger picture that's important. and the bigger picture shows it's rounded.

2) that experiment's error is well known to be due to refraction within the atmosphere. is this finding incorrect? if so, how?

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2011, 03:37:43 PM »
2) that experiment's error is well known to be due to refraction within the atmosphere. is this finding incorrect? if so, how?
Read Earth Not a Globe.
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

?

Verrine

  • 819
  • +0/-0
  • Friend of Dr Crustinator
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2011, 03:42:11 PM »
it's the bigger picture that's important. and the bigger picture shows it's rounded.

Please provide evidence.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2011, 04:49:55 PM »
Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

?

be cool

  • 39
  • +0/-0
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2011, 06:59:04 PM »
2) that experiment's error is well known to be due to refraction within the atmosphere. is this finding incorrect? if so, how?
Read Earth Not a Globe.

link it please

Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
this

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2011, 07:01:55 PM »
2) that experiment's error is well known to be due to refraction within the atmosphere. is this finding incorrect? if so, how?
Read Earth Not a Globe.

link it please

Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
this
My pleasure http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/index.htm
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2011, 07:02:56 PM »
Bedford has been done SO MANY TIMES and concluded SO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS that it cannot be used. If photos can be doctored and therefore do not count as evidence, an experiment that has also shown the Earth to be round shouldn't count either.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2011, 03:17:53 AM »
Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
Someone on this very forum (and I can name him: Daniel) repeated the Bedford level experiment and got a result consistent with a flat Earth. How intriguing!
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

?

new_guy

  • 3
  • +0/-0
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #10 on: June 27, 2011, 06:13:31 AM »
Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
Someone on this very forum (and I can name him: Daniel) repeated the Bedford level experiment and got a result consistent with a flat Earth. How intriguing!

no he didn't you stupid little faggot, he posted no conclusions, the thread is incomplete, stop talking out your arse and leave it clean for your boyfriends, you dirty little undecided fag

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #11 on: June 27, 2011, 06:15:58 AM »
Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
Someone on this very forum (and I can name him: Daniel) repeated the Bedford level experiment and got a result consistent with a flat Earth. How intriguing!

no he didn't you stupid little faggot, he posted no conclusions, the thread is incomplete, stop talking out your arse and leave it clean for your boyfriends, you dirty little undecided fag
Please don't post low content insults. This is a warning.
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

?

new_guy

  • 3
  • +0/-0
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #12 on: June 27, 2011, 06:19:52 AM »
Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
Someone on this very forum (and I can name him: Daniel) repeated the Bedford level experiment and got a result consistent with a flat Earth. How intriguing!

no he didn't you stupid little faggot, he posted no conclusions, the thread is incomplete, stop talking out your arse and leave it clean for your boyfriends, you dirty little undecided fag
Please don't post low content insults. This is a warning.

fuck you

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #13 on: June 27, 2011, 06:54:06 AM »
Someone on this very forum (and I can name him: Daniel) repeated the Bedford level experiment and got a result consistent with a flat Earth. How intriguing!

Incorrect.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45160
  • +98/-136
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2011, 07:51:42 AM »
Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
Someone on this very forum (and I can name him: Daniel) repeated the Bedford level experiment and got a result consistent with a flat Earth. How intriguing!
Too bad that he never posted his data on this site for peer review.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2011, 10:52:03 AM »
Wasn't it shared in the Wiki?
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45160
  • +98/-136
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2011, 01:03:22 PM »
I think that he said that he put it up on the FaceBook page, but I'm not on FB so I couldn't tell.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

berny_74

  • 1785
  • +0/-0
  • The IceWall! Beat that
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2011, 01:39:28 PM »
Please don't post low content insults. This is a warning.

Are we allowed high content insults?  Can you give an example of a high content insult?
On on the adding of content side.

It would be nice to have A.R.Wallace and Daniel's findings both together to see where the results of the two differed.

Berny
New_Guy may have a point though
To be fair, sometimes what FE'ers say makes so little sense that it's hard to come up with a rebuttal.
Moonlight is good for you.

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6758
  • +0/-0
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2011, 07:00:10 PM »
Someone on this very forum repeated the Bedford Level experiment and got a result consistent with a round earth. He even provided photographs to prove it!
Someone on this very forum (and I can name him: Daniel) repeated the Bedford level experiment and got a result consistent with a flat Earth. How intriguing!

no he didn't you stupid little faggot, he posted no conclusions, the thread is incomplete, stop talking out your arse and leave it clean for your boyfriends, you dirty little undecided fag
Please don't post low content insults. This is a warning.

fuck you

Yay banhammer! Also, I'm curious as to why he was sensitive enough to say 'arse' instead of the obvious, but could still say all the rest.

*

Skeleton

  • 955
  • +0/-0
  • Frankly, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #19 on: June 27, 2011, 07:35:30 PM »


1) Look out your window



Looking out of my window shows a sharp horizon across the sea rather than one that fades away gradually through the atmosphere. That is what I would expect to see on a round earth, not a flat one. Duh.
If the ultimate objective is to kill Skeleton, we should just do that next.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #20 on: June 27, 2011, 07:43:09 PM »
Yay banhammer! Also, I'm curious as to why he was sensitive enough to say 'arse' instead of the obvious, but could still say all the rest.

I don't know, maybe he's British?
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

crackpipe larry

  • 178
  • +0/-0
  • I poopded.. <%!
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #21 on: June 30, 2011, 09:22:11 PM »
Yay banhammer! Also, I'm curious as to why he was sensitive enough to say 'arse' instead of the obvious, but could still say all the rest.

I don't know, maybe he's British?

Let's all hope not..
Why are Pandas so rare??   cuz, Panda tastes good.. <is>

?

Puttah

  • 1860
  • +0/-0
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #22 on: July 01, 2011, 05:52:51 AM »
Since we round earthers tend to disprove many of flat earthen theory i would like to give them a chance to disprove RET. Please post evidence that the earth cannot be round for (insert reason here). Mind you these reasons must be able to be fact checked and not some magic equation you wrote down while watching opera.

I'd like to be the defender for once. I want a turn at making up shit...
Scepti, this idiocy needs to stop and it needs to stop right now. You are making a mockery of this fine forum with your poor trolling. You are a complete disgrace.

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #23 on: July 01, 2011, 08:11:41 AM »
I like how my post about Bedford being inconclusive gets ignored all the time by TFES.

?

Verrine

  • 819
  • +0/-0
  • Friend of Dr Crustinator
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #24 on: July 01, 2011, 09:46:11 AM »
I like how my post about Bedford being inconclusive gets ignored all the time by TFES.

Because it's incorrect.

*

berny_74

  • 1785
  • +0/-0
  • The IceWall! Beat that
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #25 on: July 01, 2011, 01:42:09 PM »
I like how my post about Bedford being inconclusive gets ignored all the time by TFES.

Because it's incorrect.

Not what the most recent person who conducted it concluded.  He was pretty much on an inconclusive answer.  Therefore unless you plan on making the experiment yourself you have little to add.

Berny
A.R. Wallace is my hero for the time it takes me to finish a McMini
To be fair, sometimes what FE'ers say makes so little sense that it's hard to come up with a rebuttal.
Moonlight is good for you.

?

Verrine

  • 819
  • +0/-0
  • Friend of Dr Crustinator
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #26 on: July 01, 2011, 02:09:54 PM »
I like how my post about Bedford being inconclusive gets ignored all the time by TFES.

Because it's incorrect.

Not what the most recent person who conducted it concluded.  He was pretty much on an inconclusive answer.  Therefore unless you plan on making the experiment yourself you have little to add.

Berny
A.R. Wallace is my hero for the time it takes me to finish a McMini

I have performed the experiment myself and my results matched Rowbotham's results.

*

Marcus Aurelius

  • 4540
  • +0/-0
  • My Alts: Tom Bishop, Gayer, theonlydann
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #27 on: July 01, 2011, 02:33:34 PM »
I like how my post about Bedford being inconclusive gets ignored all the time by TFES.

Because it's incorrect.

Not what the most recent person who conducted it concluded.  He was pretty much on an inconclusive answer.  Therefore unless you plan on making the experiment yourself you have little to add.

Berny
A.R. Wallace is my hero for the time it takes me to finish a McMini

I have performed the experiment myself and my results matched Rowbotham's results.

Good.  Do you intend on posting your results for peer review?

*

berny_74

  • 1785
  • +0/-0
  • The IceWall! Beat that
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #28 on: July 01, 2011, 02:42:50 PM »
I like how my post about Bedford being inconclusive gets ignored all the time by TFES.

Because it's incorrect.

Not what the most recent person who conducted it concluded.  He was pretty much on an inconclusive answer.  Therefore unless you plan on making the experiment yourself you have little to add.

Berny
A.R. Wallace is my hero for the time it takes me to finish a McMini

I have performed the experiment myself and my results matched Rowbotham's results.

One thing, Rowbotham's results were contested and considered inconclusive when done with multiple observers.  Nor did he publish pictures.  And where are your pictures?

Berny
A picture is worth a thousand words.

To be fair, sometimes what FE'ers say makes so little sense that it's hard to come up with a rebuttal.
Moonlight is good for you.

?

Verrine

  • 819
  • +0/-0
  • Friend of Dr Crustinator
Re: Disprove RET
« Reply #29 on: July 01, 2011, 03:02:11 PM »
Good.  Do you intend on posting your results for peer review?

I already posted the results.

One thing, Rowbotham's results were contested and considered inconclusive when done with multiple observers.  Nor did he publish pictures.  And where are your pictures?

Berny
A picture is worth a thousand words.

I didn't say anything about pictures.