Fireworks on the Moon

So the ESA probe SMART-1 crashed into the moon right on schedual.  The explosion was to dim to see with the naked eye.  But it was picked up by Amature astronomers all over the western hemisphere.

To the FE'ers who belive that the entire space program is a fake, how do you account for this?

They hit the moon with a rocket.  How is that proof of the space program?

TheEngineer, Read your own FAQ:

"NASA does not send rockets into space, they instead spend the money on developing advanced computers and imaging software instead"

crashing an orbiter into the moon should be proof that the above statement is not correct.

it doesn't say cannot.

This could be proof that they are onto FES

it doesn't say cannot.

This could be proof that they are onto FES

They're that worried about five net loons?

Exactly,

If anything theyre just trying to stop this before the off chance of it spreading happens.

CrimsonKing, think very carefully about what your implying here.

I brought SMART-1 to the forum's attention about 12 hours before it crashed.  I think I'm right in saying that no one here would have known about this otherwise.

If NASA/ESA had planned SMART-1 just to discredit this forum, they would have had to of known that I would post it here.  You are indirectly accusing me of being part of the conspiracy.

Not only that, but I didn't learn about SMART-1 from a NASA source, rather I learned about it from an independant science blog.  That means they would of had to manuver a non NASA writer to post about it on his blog which I don't cite all that often.  Something tells me they wouldn't have spent so much money perpetrating the hoax on the incrediblly small chance that it actually made it to this forum.

What's the big deal anyway?  They crashed a probe into the moon.  When they land one there, I will be mildly exited.

The Engineer, I am curious as to how they could prove to you that they have successfully landed there when/if they do.  Is there anything that could be done that would prove to you without a doubt that they have landed there?

have NASA bring him along would be good I'm sure


Oh and I realize the implications of what I said, the comment was made in jest, but you have to realize that it really wouldnt be too hard to send something to crash into the moon, just need a lot of rocketfuel and something somewhat explosive (to make things easier.)

SMART-1 was made by ESA for fucks sake.

I think I'm right in saying that no one here would have known about this otherwise.

Believe it or not, you're not the only one that watches/listens/reads the news.... :shock:

Perhaps, there was no "crash" or possibly even a "probe". According to FE theory, the Moon emits the light reflected from the Earth. Therefore, an explosion on the surface of the Earth would have appeared on the surface of the Moon. That is how they could arrange the "collision" even without launching a rocket.

Perhaps, there was no "crash" or possibly even a "probe". According to FE theory, the Moon emits the light reflected from the Earth. Therefore, an explosion on the surface of the Earth would have appeared on the surface of the Moon. That is how they could arrange the "collision" even without launching a rocket.

You are full of shit.

"You are full of shit."

I love you, too.

SMART-1 was made by ESA for fucks sake.

Yea, we know.  When they are technologically capable of landing on the moon, put out a press release.

You guys are crazy lol the earth is flat?Firworks on the moon?What are you guys smoking cuz i want some.

You guys are crazy lol the earth is flat?Firworks on the moon?What are you guys smoking cuz i want some.

Maybe you should read the thread first.

Apparently you reply fast also.

P.S. Where can i find some fireworks?I mean i want some like they used on the moon.They must be really good if they got thru the atmosphere and travelled alllllll the way to the moon.....Hmmm i wonder how big the wick would have to be.

Spike, please read the entire thread before posting about it.

I was using "fireworks" in it's metaphorical sense.

No, I don't actually mean that someone was conducting a late 4th of July celebration on the moon.

"Fireworks on the Moon" just made a better title than say "Probe crashes into Luna" or "Lights from the moon's surface."

Quote from: "Ezkerraldean"

SMART-1 was made by ESA for fucks sake.

Yea, we know.  When they are technologically capable of landing on the moon, put out a press release.

TheEngineer you have not yet answered my question, how could they prove to you that they have landed on the moon.  It seems to be that it is impossible to entirely prove to you that they will land on the moon.

Well, they didn't land on it, they crashed into it.

you still didnt answer his question  

you guys always avoid giving answers

Quote from: "TheEngineer"

Quote from: "Ezkerraldean"

SMART-1 was made by ESA for fucks sake.

Yea, we know.  When they are technologically capable of landing on the moon, put out a press release.

TheEngineer you have not yet answered my question, how could they prove to you that they have landed on the moon.  It seems to be that it is impossible to entirely prove to you that they will land on the moon.

 


You cant FEers are too STUBBERN AND CLOSE MINDED and besides if it did happen that would ruin there stupid conspiracy theory.

you still didnt answer his question  

you guys always avoid giving answers

When they actually land on it, I will believe it.

it already happend so y dont u believe it

When the ESA lands on it I will believe that the ESA did it.  That is what we are talking about.

The thread starter made it out to be a huge deal.  THEY CRASHED INTO THE MOON.  Call me when they have figured out how to land on it, then I will be impressed.

If we did it in the 60's they obviosly can do it now so y not believe it now

THEY CRASHED INTO IT!!!