Well ignoring the first part, let's break the post down.
When presented with logical evidence that can be tested by yourself at home they refuse to respond.
Care to say what evidence this is?
When presented with visual evidence they claim conspiracy.
Photos of the Earth can easily be made by CGI. It's perfectly logical explanation if indeed, the world is flat.
When presented with common sense they use writing in the Bible that is not to be taken literally.
The common sense thing is either false or a gross overstatement. The only people here that take the Bible literally are Raa (who's probably gone) and 17 November (who's insane).
When presented with such things as expeditions, flights, and other well-known achievements they claim conspiracy.
I have yet to see an expedition that cannot be explained on FE.
When presented with the world governments they make claims such as the U.S. rules the world, the governments are not in turmoil
As stated before, only a few powerful governments would have to know. Pretty much any government that has a space agency. This is the only thing in this post that is a worthy counter point. I admit, this is highly improbable, but still
possible.
, the sky is a hologram,
They never claimed this and you know that.
and penguins were artificially engineered in 1960. They do not listen to the evidence that penguins existed before 1960, nor do they listen to the evidence that technoledgy to splice DNA was not available in the 1960 and only primitive forms today.
I have no idea why Dogplatter posted this and I'm going to assume it was a joke.
They do not listen to evidence of NASA & Photoshop\Pictures\Hand-Written Acounts claiming conspiracy, brainwashing, and mechanical errors.
Huh? Well no shit they don't listen to NASA, they're the head of the freaking conspiracy! As for brainwashing and mechanical errors, I have no idea what you're arguing there.
Face it, you have no *real* evidence or arguement. All you do is claim conspiracy.
Uh, yeah, that's why it's called a conspiracy.