@Dancing Badger

  • 44 Replies
  • 7293 Views
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
@Dancing Badger
« on: July 05, 2010, 03:34:36 PM »
You've been a member for more than two months, have an online time of more than 20 hours, and yet have only one post. You, my friend, know how to lurk moar.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Muphci

  • 4410
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2010, 09:26:38 PM »
</lurk>

Belief without evidence = faith. If the act of looking out of the window and seeing that the earth looks flat is cited as reason for belief that the earth is in fact flat, it is therefore by definition being cited as evidence that the earth is flat.

There is a difference between claiming to know a thing (like belief in God, for example) because you have faith, unsupported by independently verifiable evidence, and claiming to know a thing (like water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, for example) which can be supported by evidence - in this case experiment and measurement. Whether or not that is good or sufficient evidence is another argument entirely.

I ask, then, is the FAQ exhorting us to take on faith that the earth is flat? Or is it suggesting that the view out of my window (or anybody else's window, or Tom Bishop's beach, wherever is accessible) provides "support" for me believing that proposition? If the latter, it is clearly citing that view as evidence - support for a belief is evidence.

If I were to be unreasonably literal and pedantic, which appears a popular rhetorical device round these parts (I'm trying to fit in  ;) ), I have to say that the actual view out of my window supports the Lumpy Earth Theory - it's hilly round here. Just saying.

<lurk>
There is no such thing as no time for fisting.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2010, 11:20:44 PM »
The lurk tags are reversed. script fail.

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2010, 11:40:31 PM »
The lurk tags are reversed. script fail.

No their not.  Dancing Badger is turning off "lurk mode" to post and then turning it back on.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2010, 11:41:21 PM »
The lurk tags are reversed. script fail.

No their not.  Dancing Badger is turning off "lurk mode" to post and then turning it back on.

Oh, so this is just a snippet of their script. gotcha.

*

Ocius

  • Official Member
  • 7529
  • +0/-0
  • Space President
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2010, 12:02:52 AM »
The lurk tags are reversed. script fail.

No their not. 

English fail.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2010, 06:23:22 AM »
script fail.
English fail.
[/quote]
Fags. The both of you.

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 23955
  • +6/-1
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2010, 06:25:12 AM »
Quote
script fail.
English fail.
Fags. The both of you.
[/quote]

Quoting a quote fail makes me a winner... right?

*

Weegee Board

  • 10300
  • +0/-0
  • Pokemon Master
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2010, 07:18:47 AM »
script fail.
English fail.
Fags. The both of you.
[/quote]

You are a dumbass.

?

Nomad

  • Official Member
  • 16894
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2010, 07:48:56 AM »
script fail.
English fail.
Fags. The both of you.
[/quote]

Reported for homosexual slurs
Nomad is a superhero.

8/30 NEVAR FORGET

*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"


*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2010, 03:58:06 PM »
Ooh, just spotted this - I got a thread all of my own.

Not only that, but managed to cause a small amount of controversy with the one post I made. Excellent. I suppose I'm going to have to post something a bit more substantial at some stage.

I have been enjoying reading these forums, I've come across some ideas which are really quite unusual, but every time I think to myself, "Ooh, this poster really is talking rubbish, I'm going to shoot him or her down in flames with my amazing argument," I lurk a bit moar and find some bugger has already said it. Or maybe I should just go for it and restate an existing position, only try and do it more eloquently.

I'll have another lurk and a think about it....  ;D

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52412
  • +102/-95
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #14 on: July 11, 2010, 04:02:05 PM »
OR you could come over to the flat side and come up with arguments for the noobs to try and shoot down. 
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2010, 07:07:50 PM »
I have been enjoying reading these forums, I've come across some ideas which are really quite unusual, but every time I think to myself, "Ooh, this poster really is talking rubbish, I'm going to shoot him or her down in flames with my amazing argument," I lurk a bit moar and find some bugger has already said it.

I wish all new people were as awesome as you. If we had more people like you, we wouldn't have RE'ers bawwing every time we have to say "lurk moar" or "see faq".

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2010, 08:08:24 PM »
Welcome new person.

If you need to feel a sense of accomplishment without the actual need of accomplishing anything at all, you should argue in favor of the round earth.  You seem fairly stable though so maybe not.  :)

?

Muphci

  • 4410
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2010, 08:32:43 PM »
Dancing Badger is awesome. I love you, Dancing Badger! May you lead the example for all posters of this site.
There is no such thing as no time for fisting.

*

Lord Wilmore

  • Vice President
  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 12086
  • +3/-3
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #18 on: July 12, 2010, 07:21:45 AM »
Ooh, just spotted this - I got a thread all of my own.

Not only that, but managed to cause a small amount of controversy with the one post I made. Excellent. I suppose I'm going to have to post something a bit more substantial at some stage.

I have been enjoying reading these forums, I've come across some ideas which are really quite unusual, but every time I think to myself, "Ooh, this poster really is talking rubbish, I'm going to shoot him or her down in flames with my amazing argument," I lurk a bit moar and find some bugger has already said it. Or maybe I should just go for it and restate an existing position, only try and do it more eloquently.

I'll have another lurk and a think about it....  ;D


I approve of this poster.
"I want truth for truth's sake, not for the applaud or approval of men. I would not reject truth because it is unpopular, nor accept error because it is popular. I should rather be right and stand alone than run with the multitude and be wrong." - C.S. DeFord

*

Weegee Board

  • 10300
  • +0/-0
  • Pokemon Master
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2010, 04:27:13 PM »
Dancing Badger is awesome. I love you, Dancing Badger! May you lead the example for all posters of this site.

The courtship begins.

?

Muphci

  • 4410
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2010, 05:14:55 PM »
Dancing Badger is awesome. I love you, Dancing Badger! May you lead the example for all posters of this site.

The courtship begins.

I thought you wanted me with Nomad; now it's Dancing Badger?
There is no such thing as no time for fisting.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2010, 06:38:53 PM »
Dancing Badger is awesome. I love you, Dancing Badger! May you lead the example for all posters of this site.

The courtship begins.

I thought you wanted me with Nomad; now it's Dancing Badger?

This is typical behavior of whores.

?

Muphci

  • 4410
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #22 on: July 12, 2010, 06:52:11 PM »
I don't want them; Doni wants me to want them. Therefore, Doni's the whore...indirectly...sort of...not really.
There is no such thing as no time for fisting.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #23 on: July 12, 2010, 07:03:30 PM »
I don't want them; Doni wants me to want them. Therefore, Doni's the whore...indirectly...sort of...not really.

No, you ho. Doni's the pimp.

?

Muphci

  • 4410
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #24 on: July 12, 2010, 07:12:14 PM »
But I never agreed. I just make his sammiches on occasion.
There is no such thing as no time for fisting.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #25 on: July 12, 2010, 07:14:12 PM »
Does Doni have to slap a biatch?

?

Muphci

  • 4410
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #26 on: July 12, 2010, 07:30:12 PM »
>:(
There is no such thing as no time for fisting.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #27 on: July 12, 2010, 07:32:51 PM »
Don't be sad. It makes wrinkles on your pretty face decreasing its worth.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #28 on: September 08, 2010, 04:07:51 PM »
This thread and his responses need to be stickied for newbies to read.

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35188
  • +1/-0
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: @Dancing Badger
« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2010, 02:51:53 AM »
Last Active:    Today at 05:37:30 AM

The lurking continues.