That is a sophomoric attempt to say chemical charge is a substitute for strong and weak nuclear force.
No, it is a sophomoric attempt to say X-force charge is a substitute for gravity.
There was no mention of X force in the original post, just charge variability. When some one says charge I, like most earth scientists think chemical charge (+ & -) of a substance.
Unfortunatly Newtons first law (absence of net force leaves a body in suspension unless acted upon by another force) just further solidifies why Gravity is necessary for Geomorphic progression. Since in UA the net force is in an upward velocity, mass wasting as well as stream flow would be reversed, and I've yet to encounter a stream flowing up. As for sources, please provide peer reviewed sources conducting legitimate scientific inquiry that resulted in findings conducive to FE. That would be much appreciated. In return I will provide a few peer reviewed sources supporting RE:
http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=TRD&recid=A9218161AH&q=earth+sphericity+&uid=789464004&setcookie=yes
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119756467/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/34/10/877.short
http://www.springerlink.com/content/u81520k014t73041/
http://www.seis.nagoya-u.ac.jp/yamaoka/paper/rg.pdf
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=370924
These papers are from a variety of disciplines all in some way indicating the spheroidal nature of the Earth.
Oh, no one has told you yet? UA only effects the earth such that anything on the surface of the earth isn't effected by it directly. that said, water when in free fall, is stationary. the earth just rushes up to meet it, and wedges it down ward, like what happens if you were to push a ball with a wedge
If Universal Acceleration doesn't effect the entire "flat" earth at the same time it should be renamed to " unknown but subjectively variable force hat pushes everything up but the earths surface" acceleration. An unfortunate hole in your logic is you provide a simple experiment to prove that concept via a wedge and a ball, however since this can be explained by the current RE model of 4 elementary forces and physics, you must do better then that. If that we atmosphere the case the atmosphere would be pushed aside too and the earth would push straight through it. Here's an experiment for you, push a wedge up through a tub of water, what happens when the wedge pushes through the surface of the water? does the water stay on it? or does the water flow back into the tub?
At best UA would cause all water in the world to be continually pressed against the outer extents of the world (the rim) and we would be left with no lakes, no streams etc. the atmosphere would likewise be pushed out the same way and weather could not occur.
As per the concept of free fall......YOU CAN NOT FREE FALL WITH UA... ... without gravity, UA would have to keep pushing you up (seeing as it is UNIVERSAL) so what would cause the water to "free fall"?
EX: what direction does a person in the ocean with exactly neutral buoyancy "fall" ? no where, because gravity is checked by buoyancy and in the absence of another force the person remains at equilibrium. Since FE says there is no mass on earth, why does a rock sink while that person floats?
The easy answer is density, however:
p=m/v
is the formula for density, the m = mass, v= volume and p= density. So since density is a function of MASS and volume, nothing can have density on an earth with no mass.