Antimoon?!?!?!

  • 209 Replies
  • 54321 Views
?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #30 on: April 25, 2010, 06:03:19 PM »
I don't have a picture of the Antimoon to hand, not least because it's one of the most boring objects in the night sky. You could go outside on almost any clear night and photograph it for yourself - it's the Moon-sized patch of starless sky.

You guys are all messed up. You tell us to do crap. Why can't you? Stop making excuses, and prove EVERYTHING that has to do with the Flat Earth Society. I hate when people ask for evidence, you link to THIS website. Hello? Of course it will back up what you say!

Why does the Antimoon even really have anything to do with the shape of the Earth? I mean, it exists whether the Earth is flat, round or a donut. It's out there in the sky for everyone to see. Why does globularism drive people to deny the most basic facts in order to defend their crazy theory?

I bolded the important part. Show me the antimoon. And they are related. I'll tell you how. They're related because they are both crap that FE'ers made up to keep stupid websites like these going so everyone can get a good rofl. People believe in a flat Earth because THEY are the one's paid. The real conspiracy is the FE'ers. Next thing we know, they're gonna brainwash the RE'ers into thinkin the world is flat. And you know, you make me lmfao, but not as much as Parsifal.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #31 on: April 25, 2010, 06:05:19 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

He's gonna say something shitty like "It's a government website. Its fake!" Don't bother with him.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #32 on: April 25, 2010, 06:07:08 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

You can literally see the lines where it's been pieced together on the computer. Seriously, Round Earthers always complain about our mistrust for "photo evidence", but they really prove our point when they come up with trash like this.

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

I have just cited two recent peer-reviewed studies which directly contradict this claim. You should write to the British Medical Journal with your data and get them to redact those articles.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #33 on: April 25, 2010, 06:09:19 PM »
I bolded the important part. Show me the antimoon. And they are related. I'll tell you how. They're related because they are both crap that FE'ers made up to keep stupid websites like these going so everyone can get a good rofl. People believe in a flat Earth because THEY are the one's paid. The real conspiracy is the FE'ers. Next thing we know, they're gonna brainwash the RE'ers into thinkin the world is flat. And you know, you make me lmfao, but not as much as Parsifal.

I don't even understand the point of this kind of request, I can no more show you the Antimoon than I can tell you to go outside and look in the sky. Do you want me to drive to your house and point?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #34 on: April 25, 2010, 06:14:19 PM »
I bolded the important part. Show me the antimoon. And they are related. I'll tell you how. They're related because they are both crap that FE'ers made up to keep stupid websites like these going so everyone can get a good rofl. People believe in a flat Earth because THEY are the one's paid. The real conspiracy is the FE'ers. Next thing we know, they're gonna brainwash the RE'ers into thinkin the world is flat. And you know, you make me lmfao, but not as much as Parsifal.

I don't even understand the point of this kind of request, I can no more show you the Antimoon than I can tell you to go outside and look in the sky. Do you want me to drive to your house and point?

That, actually, would be nice. But I'll save you the trouble. Here's what you can do. Take your digital camera, take a picture, download it to your computer, and then show me the place where the antimoon is by drawing a circle. Thanks!
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #35 on: April 25, 2010, 06:16:52 PM »
I bolded the important part. Show me the antimoon. And they are related. I'll tell you how. They're related because they are both crap that FE'ers made up to keep stupid websites like these going so everyone can get a good rofl. People believe in a flat Earth because THEY are the one's paid. The real conspiracy is the FE'ers. Next thing we know, they're gonna brainwash the RE'ers into thinkin the world is flat. And you know, you make me lmfao, but not as much as Parsifal.

I don't even understand the point of this kind of request, I can no more show you the Antimoon than I can tell you to go outside and look in the sky. Do you want me to drive to your house and point?

That, actually, would be nice. But I'll save you the trouble. Here's what you can do. Take your digital camera, take a picture, download it to your computer, and then show me the place where the antimoon is by drawing a circle. Thanks!

I do not have a digital camera. Can't you just go outside?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #36 on: April 25, 2010, 06:22:08 PM »
I bolded the important part. Show me the antimoon. And they are related. I'll tell you how. They're related because they are both crap that FE'ers made up to keep stupid websites like these going so everyone can get a good rofl. People believe in a flat Earth because THEY are the one's paid. The real conspiracy is the FE'ers. Next thing we know, they're gonna brainwash the RE'ers into thinkin the world is flat. And you know, you make me lmfao, but not as much as Parsifal.

I don't even understand the point of this kind of request, I can no more show you the Antimoon than I can tell you to go outside and look in the sky. Do you want me to drive to your house and point?

That, actually, would be nice. But I'll save you the trouble. Here's what you can do. Take your digital camera, take a picture, download it to your computer, and then show me the place where the antimoon is by drawing a circle. Thanks!

I do not have a digital camera. Can't you just go outside?

Nope. And buy one. It is the essentials of today.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #37 on: April 25, 2010, 06:24:01 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

You can literally see the lines where it's been pieced together on the computer. Seriously, Round Earthers always complain about our mistrust for "photo evidence", but they really prove our point when they come up with trash like this.

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

I have just cited two recent peer-reviewed studies which directly contradict this claim. You should write to the British Medical Journal with your data and get them to redact those articles.

Ok, I told you he'd make up a crap excuse. So James, unless I'm extremely blind, I don't see the place where it's pieced together. Just because you're a nice guy, why don't you download the picture, edit the picture to draw where it is pieced together, save it, then post the new one here. Because I don't see the line. Sorry for the trouble. Thanks in advance!
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

?

Lorddave

  • 19888
  • +30/-61
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #38 on: April 25, 2010, 06:24:44 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

You can literally see the lines where it's been pieced together on the computer. Seriously, Round Earthers always complain about our mistrust for "photo evidence", but they really prove our point when they come up with trash like this.

Wow... is that it?  Are you seriously going to go by that?  
I guess you don't understand how a panoramic image is made do you?
See, no camera in the world can capture 360 degrees of an image simultaneously.  None.  So the best way to do it is to take one frame at a time, rotating the camera a specific degrees, then pitch it up and do it again until you have the whole area.  You then take the pictures and paste them together.

Unless you'd like to tell me how to do it with a single camera taking only one image.

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

I have just cited two recent peer-reviewed studies which directly contradict this claim. You should write to the British Medical Journal with your data and get them to redact those articles.
[/quote]
Why should I?  The only thing it says was that animal bites increased during a full moon cycle.  These are bites during the day or night, not just night.  The other showed a correlation between reported crimes on lunar days.

They both don't say anything about WHY it is, just that it is.  And even if you want to say it's increased aggression, I hardly consider that blindness or death.
You can make up whatever idea you want, but until a study is done to see what changes occur in humans during the lunar cycle, you have nothing but correlation.  And correlation doesn't mean anything.
After all, the reading scores in elementary schools are directly related to the child's shoe size.
Gone.

?

Lorddave

  • 19888
  • +30/-61
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #39 on: April 25, 2010, 06:27:07 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

You can literally see the lines where it's been pieced together on the computer. Seriously, Round Earthers always complain about our mistrust for "photo evidence", but they really prove our point when they come up with trash like this.

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

I have just cited two recent peer-reviewed studies which directly contradict this claim. You should write to the British Medical Journal with your data and get them to redact those articles.

Ok, I told you he'd make up a crap excuse. So James, unless I'm extremely blind, I don't see the place where it's pieced together. Just because you're a nice guy, why don't you download the picture, edit the picture to draw where it is pieced together, save it, then post the new one here. Because I don't see the line. Sorry for the trouble. Thanks in advance!

Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.
Gone.

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #40 on: April 25, 2010, 06:29:46 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

You can literally see the lines where it's been pieced together on the computer. Seriously, Round Earthers always complain about our mistrust for "photo evidence", but they really prove our point when they come up with trash like this.

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

I have just cited two recent peer-reviewed studies which directly contradict this claim. You should write to the British Medical Journal with your data and get them to redact those articles.

Ok, I told you he'd make up a crap excuse. So James, unless I'm extremely blind, I don't see the place where it's pieced together. Just because you're a nice guy, why don't you download the picture, edit the picture to draw where it is pieced together, save it, then post the new one here. Because I don't see the line. Sorry for the trouble. Thanks in advance!

Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

My signature will explain everything. And I'm not experienced with this stuff.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #41 on: April 25, 2010, 06:32:06 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

You can literally see the lines where it's been pieced together on the computer. Seriously, Round Earthers always complain about our mistrust for "photo evidence", but they really prove our point when they come up with trash like this.

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

I have just cited two recent peer-reviewed studies which directly contradict this claim. You should write to the British Medical Journal with your data and get them to redact those articles.

Ok, I told you he'd make up a crap excuse. So James, unless I'm extremely blind, I don't see the place where it's pieced together. Just because you're a nice guy, why don't you download the picture, edit the picture to draw where it is pieced together, save it, then post the new one here. Because I don't see the line. Sorry for the trouble. Thanks in advance!

"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #42 on: April 25, 2010, 06:34:33 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #43 on: April 25, 2010, 06:35:25 PM »
Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

You can literally see the lines where it's been pieced together on the computer. Seriously, Round Earthers always complain about our mistrust for "photo evidence", but they really prove our point when they come up with trash like this.

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.

I have just cited two recent peer-reviewed studies which directly contradict this claim. You should write to the British Medical Journal with your data and get them to redact those articles.

Ok, I told you he'd make up a crap excuse. So James, unless I'm extremely blind, I don't see the place where it's pieced together. Just because you're a nice guy, why don't you download the picture, edit the picture to draw where it is pieced together, save it, then post the new one here. Because I don't see the line. Sorry for the trouble. Thanks in advance!



*chuckle* I thought we cleared this up with Lorddave. So let's talk about the blank spot in the sky you say exists.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #44 on: April 25, 2010, 06:36:26 PM »
If by "cleared up" you mean "dismissed because the image is doctored", then yes, we did.

As I've already told you, if you get up off your arse and go outside at night, you can see the Antimoon for yourself.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Lorddave

  • 19888
  • +30/-61
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #45 on: April 25, 2010, 06:40:08 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?
Gone.

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #46 on: April 25, 2010, 06:40:18 PM »
If by "cleared up" you mean "dismissed because the image is doctored", then yes, we did.

As I've already told you, if you get up off your arse and go outside at night, you can see the Antimoon for yourself.

Ok, I had to go outside. I didn't see it. Can you be more specific? Where would it be located? Near Polaris, Vega, The Big and/or Little Dipper? And the image is obviously doctored by FE'ers. We [now me also] are trying to explain how you can make a full 360 picture with one shot.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #47 on: April 25, 2010, 06:41:09 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

Yes, this makes it the 4th time.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #48 on: April 25, 2010, 06:43:10 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

There is no possible way to verify the contiguity of the images in a such a collage. Why must you insist on trying to justify your use of doctored images? Why can't you prove your point without resorting to that kind of unscrupulous evasion?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #49 on: April 25, 2010, 06:44:55 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

There is no possible way to verify the contiguity of the images in a such a collage. Why must you insist on trying to justify your use of doctored images? Why can't you prove your point without resorting to that kind of unscrupulous evasion?

WHY CAN'T YOU POINT OUT THAT THERE IS NO BLACK SPOT IN THE SKY? OR IF THERE IS, SHOW ME!
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #50 on: April 25, 2010, 06:45:57 PM »
If by "cleared up" you mean "dismissed because the image is doctored", then yes, we did.

As I've already told you, if you get up off your arse and go outside at night, you can see the Antimoon for yourself.

Ok, I had to go outside. I didn't see it. Can you be more specific? Where would it be located? Near Polaris, Vega, The Big and/or Little Dipper? And the image is obviously doctored by FE'ers. We [now me also] are trying to explain how you can make a full 360 picture with one shot.

Clearly its position in the sky has no relation to the stars, it is much closer to Earth. Which hemiplane are you in, inner or outer? And what is your longditude?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Lorddave

  • 19888
  • +30/-61
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #51 on: April 25, 2010, 06:46:40 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

There is no possible way to verify the contiguity of the images in a such a collage. Why must you insist on trying to justify your use of doctored images? Why can't you prove your point without resorting to that kind of unscrupulous evasion?

Very well then.
Tell me how I can make a 360 degree panoramic image that isn't made up of a collage of images that will satisfy you.

Should I take a video camera and pan it around?
Gone.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #52 on: April 25, 2010, 06:46:59 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

There is no possible way to verify the contiguity of the images in a such a collage. Why must you insist on trying to justify your use of doctored images? Why can't you prove your point without resorting to that kind of unscrupulous evasion?

WHY CAN'T YOU POINT OUT THAT THERE IS NO BLACK SPOT IN THE SKY? OR IF THERE IS, SHOW ME!

I am doing my absolute best to try and help you locate the Antimoon, you clearly do not actually care about seeing it or not. I am not sure how much further I can progress with this nonsense.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #53 on: April 25, 2010, 06:48:00 PM »
Very well then.
Tell me how I can make a 360 degree panoramic image that isn't made up of a collage of images that will satisfy you.

Should I take a video camera and pan it around?

I don't want to see a 360 degree collage of the sky, I don't know why you keep bringing this up?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Lorddave

  • 19888
  • +30/-61
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #54 on: April 25, 2010, 06:49:11 PM »
Very well then.
Tell me how I can make a 360 degree panoramic image that isn't made up of a collage of images that will satisfy you.

Should I take a video camera and pan it around?

I don't want to see a 360 degree collage of the sky, I don't know why you keep bringing this up?

I know you don't.
So how do I get a picture that isn't one?
Gone.

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #55 on: April 25, 2010, 06:49:23 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

There is no possible way to verify the contiguity of the images in a such a collage. Why must you insist on trying to justify your use of doctored images? Why can't you prove your point without resorting to that kind of unscrupulous evasion?

WHY CAN'T YOU POINT OUT THAT THERE IS NO BLACK SPOT IN THE SKY? OR IF THERE IS, SHOW ME!

I am doing my absolute best to try and help you locate the Antimoon, you clearly do not actually care about seeing it or not. I am not sure how much further I can progress with this nonsense.

No, I really do want to see it. And what is a hemiplane? I live in New York. Where would it app. be?
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

The Question1

  • 390
  • +0/-0
  • Your logic is inferior to my logic.
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #56 on: April 25, 2010, 06:49:32 PM »
I bolded the important part. Show me the antimoon. And they are related. I'll tell you how. They're related because they are both crap that FE'ers made up to keep stupid websites like these going so everyone can get a good rofl. People believe in a flat Earth because THEY are the one's paid. The real conspiracy is the FE'ers. Next thing we know, they're gonna brainwash the RE'ers into thinkin the world is flat. And you know, you make me lmfao, but not as much as Parsifal.

I don't even understand the point of this kind of request, I can no more show you the Antimoon than I can tell you to go outside and look in the sky. Do you want me to drive to your house and point?

That, actually, would be nice. But I'll save you the trouble. Here's what you can do. Take your digital camera, take a picture, download it to your computer, and then show me the place where the antimoon is by drawing a circle. Thanks!

I do not have a digital camera. Can't you just go outside?
Not everyone has the luxury of living in a place where you can see stars(i know you can't in NY due to light pollution) but even when i have left the  all i saw were stars in the night sky(all over the place.)Additionaly i have yet to see any mention of such an area in the night sky.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #57 on: April 25, 2010, 06:51:03 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

There is no possible way to verify the contiguity of the images in a such a collage. Why must you insist on trying to justify your use of doctored images? Why can't you prove your point without resorting to that kind of unscrupulous evasion?

WHY CAN'T YOU POINT OUT THAT THERE IS NO BLACK SPOT IN THE SKY? OR IF THERE IS, SHOW ME!

I am doing my absolute best to try and help you locate the Antimoon, you clearly do not actually care about seeing it or not. I am not sure how much further I can progress with this nonsense.

No, I really do want to see it. And what is a hemiplane? I live in New York. Where would it app. be?

Depending on whereabouts in the city you are, the light pollution may be too great for you to locate it precisely. But, if you hold on a minute, I will go outside and try and estimate its position.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #58 on: April 25, 2010, 07:17:33 PM »
Umm...
It IS pieced together.  Has to be.
If you zoom into the picture, on the lower left corner where the sunlight is (could be moonlight with high light sensitivity on the camera) you'll notice where the frames were split.  The left and right of the "sun" has a different shade of the ground.

So you admit that the picture you presented to us is doctored. That's all I was really going for right there.

If by doctored you mean a bunch of unaltered images put together side by side then yes.
But usually doctored means altered.
Is a collage an altered image?
Is a puzzle an altered image?

Can you give me any specific way to take one image of a 360 degree angle?

There is no possible way to verify the contiguity of the images in a such a collage. Why must you insist on trying to justify your use of doctored images? Why can't you prove your point without resorting to that kind of unscrupulous evasion?

WHY CAN'T YOU POINT OUT THAT THERE IS NO BLACK SPOT IN THE SKY? OR IF THERE IS, SHOW ME!

I am doing my absolute best to try and help you locate the Antimoon, you clearly do not actually care about seeing it or not. I am not sure how much further I can progress with this nonsense.

No, I really do want to see it. And what is a hemiplane? I live in New York. Where would it app. be?

Depending on whereabouts in the city you are, the light pollution may be too great for you to locate it precisely. But, if you hold on a minute, I will go outside and try and estimate its position.

Ok, tell me. Where might it be?
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #59 on: April 26, 2010, 07:48:47 AM »
Fisheye lenses work great for taking 360 spherical panoramas

http://www.footootjes.nl/Panoramas_Ladakh_2008/Panoramas/20080805_Hotel_NightSky_flash.html

There.

inb4 "It's behind the trees"