« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?

  • 16 Replies
  • 3873 Views
?

Sir Mildred Pierce

  • 64
  • +0/-0
Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« on: March 05, 2010, 05:15:44 AM »
So aparently this 150 foot ice wall that surrounds the whole world keeps the water from spilling over the edge, but what keeps the Atmosphere from doing the same?



It goes pretty high up, higher than 150 feet, I'm pretty sure.
Logged
*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2010, 10:10:24 AM »
Maybe if you read the FAQs, you'd at least ask a reasonable question.

I understand thinking "Hey, a 150ft. ice wall can't hold the atmoplane" and I asked the same thing. THEN I READ THE FAQs.
Logged
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"
?

bowler

  • 871
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2010, 11:10:33 AM »
It is best to read the FAQ first. If it makes you physically sick with rage then its probably not worth your time posting. If it makes you giggle then stick around a bit.
Logged
?

2fst4u

  • 2494
  • +0/-0
  • High and Tighty
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2010, 11:27:14 AM »
That images is stupid. It clearly shows a propeller-powered aircraft flying higher than mount Everest at 29,030 ft. Propellers don't work that high.
Logged
?

ugaboga313

  • 710
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2010, 05:45:22 PM »
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 05, 2010, 10:10:24 AM
Maybe if you read the FAQs, you'd at least ask a reasonable question.

I understand thinking "Hey, a 150ft. ice wall can't hold the atmoplane" and I asked the same thing. THEN I READ THE FAQs.

The FAQ uses DET which I have no clue holds in the atmosphere. It just says it does because gravity isn't affecting it.

Seems like if I wrote a nice faq that used logic like that, I'd be laughed out of the scientific community for using that logic.
Logged
*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2010, 06:02:30 PM »
Then ask about DET and the vector field created.
Logged
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"
?

Ranger 3

  • 178
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2010, 07:11:38 PM »
Quote from: 2fst4u on March 05, 2010, 11:27:14 AM
That images is stupid. It clearly shows a propeller-powered aircraft flying higher than mount Everest at 29,030 ft. Propellers don't work that high.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Pezzi
Logged
?

ugaboga313

  • 710
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2010, 08:16:25 PM »
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 05, 2010, 06:02:30 PM
Then ask about DET and the vector field created.

Do tell. This vector field keeps all 100km high of atmosphere in? Interesting. Yet we feel no effects of it.
Logged
?

2fst4u

  • 2494
  • +0/-0
  • High and Tighty
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2010, 08:46:59 PM »
Quote from: Ranger 3 on March 05, 2010, 07:11:38 PM
Quote from: 2fst4u on March 05, 2010, 11:27:14 AM
That images is stupid. It clearly shows a propeller-powered aircraft flying higher than mount Everest at 29,030 ft. Propellers don't work that high.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Pezzi
25,000 ft is lower than 29,030 ft. I'm still right.
Logged
?

Ranger 3

  • 178
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2010, 06:25:58 AM »
Quote from: 2fst4u on March 05, 2010, 08:46:59 PM
Quote from: Ranger 3 on March 05, 2010, 07:11:38 PM
Quote from: 2fst4u on March 05, 2010, 11:27:14 AM
That images is stupid. It clearly shows a propeller-powered aircraft flying higher than mount Everest at 29,030 ft. Propellers don't work that high.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Pezzi
25,000 ft is lower than 29,030 ft. I'm still right.

No, you aren't.

"Pezzi reached supremacy above Montecelio (Rome) aboard a Caproni Ca.161 biplane with a Piaggio motor and watertight cabin, wearing a special diving apparatus picture and reaching a height of 17,083 m (56,047 ft). This record still stands today."

56,047 is significantly higher than 29,030 feet.
Logged
?

2fst4u

  • 2494
  • +0/-0
  • High and Tighty
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2010, 01:56:30 PM »
Quote from: Ranger 3 on March 06, 2010, 06:25:58 AM
Quote from: 2fst4u on March 05, 2010, 08:46:59 PM
Quote from: Ranger 3 on March 05, 2010, 07:11:38 PM
Quote from: 2fst4u on March 05, 2010, 11:27:14 AM
That images is stupid. It clearly shows a propeller-powered aircraft flying higher than mount Everest at 29,030 ft. Propellers don't work that high.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Pezzi
25,000 ft is lower than 29,030 ft. I'm still right.

No, you aren't.

"Pezzi reached supremacy above Montecelio (Rome) aboard a Caproni Ca.161 biplane with a Piaggio motor and watertight cabin, wearing a special diving apparatus picture and reaching a height of 17,083 m (56,047 ft). This record still stands today."

56,047 is significantly higher than 29,030 feet.
oh jokes. Didn't see that part. I concede defeat.
Logged
*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2010, 12:12:14 PM »
Quote from: ugaboga313 on March 05, 2010, 08:16:25 PM
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 05, 2010, 06:02:30 PM
Then ask about DET and the vector field created.

Do tell. This vector field keeps all 100km high of atmosphere in? Interesting. Yet we feel no effects of it.
IDK, why don't you click the link in the FAQ.
Logged
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"
?

ugaboga313

  • 710
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2010, 01:07:25 PM »
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 07, 2010, 12:12:14 PM
Quote from: ugaboga313 on March 05, 2010, 08:16:25 PM
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 05, 2010, 06:02:30 PM
Then ask about DET and the vector field created.

Do tell. This vector field keeps all 100km high of atmosphere in? Interesting. Yet we feel no effects of it.
IDK, why don't you click the link in the FAQ.

I did. Basically he says, magnetic field + 4th dimension creates forced containment through interaction of vectors.

1. How does the FE have a magnetic field?
2. Proof of 4th Dimension please.
3. What does Dark Energy have to do with this? Seems like he picked something we know very little about, that can create magic fields, and spun it into a Pro-FE theory.
Logged
*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2010, 10:13:15 AM »
Quote from: ugaboga313 on March 07, 2010, 01:07:25 PM
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 07, 2010, 12:12:14 PM
Quote from: ugaboga313 on March 05, 2010, 08:16:25 PM
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 05, 2010, 06:02:30 PM
Then ask about DET and the vector field created.

Do tell. This vector field keeps all 100km high of atmosphere in? Interesting. Yet we feel no effects of it.
IDK, why don't you click the link in the FAQ.

I did. Basically he says, magnetic field + 4th dimension creates forced containment through interaction of vectors.

1. How does the FE have a magnetic field?
2. Proof of 4th Dimension please.
3. What does Dark Energy have to do with this? Seems like he picked something we know very little about, that can create magic fields, and spun it into a Pro-FE theory.
1. READ THE FAQs.
2. Proof there is no 4th dimension?
3. Dark Energy is about 70% of the universe. It comes into play quite a bit.
Logged
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"
?

ugaboga313

  • 710
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2010, 08:00:38 PM »
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 08, 2010, 10:13:15 AM
Quote from: ugaboga313 on March 07, 2010, 01:07:25 PM
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 07, 2010, 12:12:14 PM
Quote from: ugaboga313 on March 05, 2010, 08:16:25 PM
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 05, 2010, 06:02:30 PM
Then ask about DET and the vector field created.

Do tell. This vector field keeps all 100km high of atmosphere in? Interesting. Yet we feel no effects of it.
IDK, why don't you click the link in the FAQ.

I did. Basically he says, magnetic field + 4th dimension creates forced containment through interaction of vectors.

1. How does the FE have a magnetic field?
2. Proof of 4th Dimension please.
3. What does Dark Energy have to do with this? Seems like he picked something we know very little about, that can create magic fields, and spun it into a Pro-FE theory.
1. READ THE FAQs.
2. Proof there is no 4th dimension?
3. Dark Energy is about 70% of the universe. It comes into play quite a bit.

Sorry but 3 is postulated, 2 you are just being annoying, and 1 is blatantly wrong in the FAQ.

Do you know how the magnetic field works? A large amount of very hot ferromagnetic metal is spinning and it generates that field. Its why the moon and mars are barren, their cores stopped spinning.

Plus, to fit the magnetosphere on a flat earth would be impossible as two massive churning cores exist instead of one. Also there would be great anomalies where the magnetic fields meet.
Logged
*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2010, 09:30:15 AM »
Please explain why you'd need two cores instead of one.
Logged
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"
?

ugaboga313

  • 710
  • +0/-0
Re: Why doesn't the Atmosphere spill over the side of the Earth?
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2010, 04:00:17 PM »
Quote from: SupahLovah on March 09, 2010, 09:30:15 AM
Please explain why you'd need two cores instead of one.

Because, if the earth is flat, and you want two poles that aren't on top of each other, you would need 2 cores.

Facepalm. Seriously SupahLovah, can you keep up? Also, nice tactic of ignoring EVERY SINGLE OTHER POINT.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »