Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis

  • 14 Replies
  • 4845 Views
?

Alchemist

  • 38
  • +0/-0
Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« on: February 21, 2010, 05:11:29 PM »
The observation of ships disappearing over a horizon at a distance seems to be a frequent topic here.  It also appears that many/most RE'ers disagree with the explanation provided in the FAQ.  I would like to offer an alternative hypothesis for everyone's review.

I think we all agree that the Earth's surface is not completely flat.  Even in areas that appear to be flat, there are gentle curves, hills and valleys.  These surface changes may be so slight that one may conclude that an area is truly flat.  While the Earth's surface is not a fluid, it does change due to wind and water.  I believe these facts are accepted in both Earth shape theories.

The oceans however are fluid and rarely if ever appear truly calm and flat.  Small waves are always present and usually observable.  Considering the vastness of the oceans, it seems reasonable to believe some of these waves could be very long with only a relatively slight difference in height.  If an undulation were several kilometers (or even tens of kilometers) in length, a height difference of ten meters could be too subtle to notice.  For example, if such an undulation were 20km in length from peak to valley with the peak 10m above the valley, the slope would only amount to a .05% grade (or about 1.72 minutes of angle) which is likely imperceptible to the naked eye.  (Feel free to check my math.)  If a ship in the distance sailed over such a peak, it would appear to "sink" below a horizon.  (The reverse may help explain observations of ships "suddenly" appearing.)  This idea seems to be compatible with a flat-Earth model.

In presenting this hypothesis, I make two requests.  First, please try to limit discussion to the merits/flaws of this idea as it is a work in progress and I'm asking your help in refining it.  Second, please try to remain civil.  I think most of you are capable of honoring both requests.  Thanks.

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2010, 05:23:59 PM »
So if I watch a large ship sail away from me, and it starts sinking, am I to assume that there's a tidal wave or tsunami coming?

?

Alchemist

  • 38
  • +0/-0
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2010, 05:40:12 PM »
So if I watch a large ship sail away from me, and it starts sinking, am I to assume that there's a tidal wave or tsunami coming?

Not at all.  The undulations I am referring to would be spread over a very large lateral distance and would likely be moving very slowing as a result.  When one couples that with the concept that all waves (tidal or otherwise) dampen as they approach land, it seems plausible. 

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2010, 06:03:08 PM »
Not at all.  The undulations I am referring to would be spread over a very large lateral distance and would likely be moving very slowing as a result.  When one couples that with the concept that all waves (tidal or otherwise) dampen as they approach land, it seems plausible.  


Waves get bigger as they approach land, it's their speed that decreases.



Once their speed decreases enough for their crests to break, they break down.

?

2fst4u

  • 2494
  • +0/-0
  • High and Tighty
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2010, 06:37:54 PM »
haha, win.

Plausible, but then the ship would come into view again after a few seconds at the most. We know this doesn't happen

*

Lord Wilmore

  • Vice President
  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 12086
  • +3/-3
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2010, 04:14:03 PM »
Waves have been suggested as a factor by some of those who believe in the 'perspective' theories. However, they can only ever be a factor, and personally I find it unlikely that a multitude of factors will constantly and consistently combine to replicate the same effect.
"I want truth for truth's sake, not for the applaud or approval of men. I would not reject truth because it is unpopular, nor accept error because it is popular. I should rather be right and stand alone than run with the multitude and be wrong." - C.S. DeFord

*

Xerox

  • 151
  • +0/-0
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2010, 08:14:55 PM »
Waves have been suggested as a factor by some of those who believe in the 'perspective' theories. However, they can only ever be a factor, and personally I find it unlikely that a multitude of factors will constantly and consistently combine to replicate the same effect.

Well said.

*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2010, 08:52:12 AM »
Maybe ships have cloaking devices.
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

?

H1GH3r

  • 41
  • +0/-0
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2010, 11:58:54 AM »
Maybe ships have cloaking devices.

Are di-lithium crystals consistent with FET?
My city was betrayed by the weak..

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45171
  • +98/-138
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2010, 12:08:14 PM »
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

H1GH3r

  • 41
  • +0/-0
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2010, 12:40:22 PM »
Maybe ships have cloaking devices.

Are di-lithium crystals consistent with FET?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilithium

That Dilithium can only exist in the gaseous state and wouldn't be able to regulate the matter/antimatter flow in the ships warp core.
My city was betrayed by the weak..

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45171
  • +98/-138
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2010, 12:50:58 PM »
Maybe ships have cloaking devices.

Are di-lithium crystals consistent with FET?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilithium

That Dilithium can only exist in the gaseous state and wouldn't be able to regulate the matter/antimatter flow in the ships warp core.

As far as you know.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

BRIKROYSTER

  • 22
  • +0/-0
  • FUCK LOGIC, BLIND UNREASONED BULLSHIT FTW!
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #12 on: March 01, 2010, 03:34:23 PM »
Have you ruled out the possibility of witchcraft?

?

corleone

  • 77
  • +0/-0
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2010, 04:21:49 AM »
Those 10km-wave 10m-height are normally produced by earthquakes or similar. No other natural things (like wind) can displace that amount of water. There is a considerably energy on this wave, and that would probably cause a disaster at land. Besides, you can see the "dissapearing ship" effect at big lakes, where wind cannot form big waves.

PD: sorry about my english, i'm spanish

?

BRIKROYSTER

  • 22
  • +0/-0
  • FUCK LOGIC, BLIND UNREASONED BULLSHIT FTW!
Re: Disappearing Ships - An Alternative Hypothesis
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2010, 10:21:19 AM »
I still think witchcraft has something to do with this. witches are a serious problem.