Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.

  • 88 Replies
  • 24924 Views
?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« on: January 11, 2010, 04:22:35 AM »
It is well known that there are polar days and polar night on the North pole, it is the time when the day or the night stays for half of the year. Well, I am a FE'er and the FE explantion is great if to say about North pole. But. It is well know(all everywhere populated) that in the South Pole there are polar nights and days too. But how the sun can be visible for half of the year, if you're observing it somewhere from the Antarctica?

If the Earth is globe - then there is explanation - same effect as on the North Pole, but if the Earth is flat, there shouldn't be a polar night or polar day in the given spot of Antarctica.

So how FE explains the polar days and polar nights in Antarctica?

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2010, 05:05:07 AM »
Sky mirror.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2010, 05:19:41 AM »
Sky mirror.

Sarcasm is clear for me. Need a FE answer here. Really, only this one point can be enought to assume that THERE IS SOUTH POLE and it's not stretched around the layout of contintets.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2010, 07:01:51 AM by dim »

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2010, 06:54:27 AM »
That was the best an FE can do.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2010, 08:17:46 AM »
What is the highest southern latitude inhabited by humans?

*

Skeleton

  • 955
  • +0/-0
  • Frankly, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2010, 11:07:01 AM »
Sky mirror.

This was disproved becuaes its too ludicrous to stand up to scrutiny.
If the ultimate objective is to kill Skeleton, we should just do that next.

*

Skeleton

  • 955
  • +0/-0
  • Frankly, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2010, 11:07:55 AM »
What is the highest southern latitude inhabited by humans?

90 degrees south, i.e. the South Pole.
If the ultimate objective is to kill Skeleton, we should just do that next.

*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2010, 11:16:47 AM »
What is the highest southern latitude inhabited by humans?

90 degrees south, i.e. the South Pole.
Let me rephrase it: Where is the southmost permanent settlement?

Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2010, 12:41:40 PM »
What is the highest southern latitude inhabited by humans?

90 degrees south, i.e. the South Pole.
Let me rephrase it: Where is the southmost permanent settlement?

That matters because?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vostok_Station

I'm not sure if it's the southernmost, but it was operated year round for 37 years.

?

LiceFarm

  • 540
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2010, 01:07:43 PM »
Sky mirror.

This is ludacris we all know that the properties of highly reflective crystal ice, which occurs naturally at the south pole are the only possible explanation.

?

toothyp1cks

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2010, 02:10:57 PM »
inb4 conspiracy, which will inevitably turn up.

Look into your heart, you know it to be true.
When I was 5 years old my mum always told me that happiness was the key to life.
When I went to school they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up.
I wrote down "happy."
They told me I didn't understand the assignment.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2010, 08:25:13 PM »
This was disproved becuaes its too ludicrous to stand up to scrutiny.

It makes predictions which match observations.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

ugaboga313

  • 710
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2010, 08:31:14 PM »
I doubt it. Please give a summary of your theory.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2010, 08:33:04 PM »
I doubt it. Please give a summary of your theory.

The sky mirror reflects sunlight onto the far side of the disc during the southern summers, while during southern winter the sunlight strikes it at the wrong angle to be reflected anywhere but far beyond the ice wall.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2010, 08:45:32 PM »
This was disproved becuaes its too ludicrous to stand up to scrutiny.

It makes predictions which match observations.


I can make up quantitative amounts of bullcrap to match any observation aswel

Without evidence, that's all you're blurting out at the moment.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2010, 09:34:24 PM »
I can make up quantitative amounts of bullcrap to match any observation aswel

Without evidence, that's all you're blurting out at the moment.

Irrelevant.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2010, 11:13:37 PM »
Provide evidence, or anything you say about the "sky mirror" might aswel be ignored.

?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2010, 11:14:59 PM »
Where is Tom or any other major FE'er?

Seems like I becoming normal after 2 years of being inside the FET...

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2010, 11:23:02 PM »
Provide evidence, or anything you say about the "sky mirror" might aswel be ignored.

Go to Antarctica in summer and look at the sky. There is evidence that the sky mirror exists.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #19 on: January 11, 2010, 11:26:42 PM »
Provide evidence, or anything you say about the "sky mirror" might aswel be ignored.

Go to Antarctica in summer and look at the sky. There is evidence that the sky mirror exists.

What sky mirror. You talking that when the Sun is in the opposite point, some far tens thousand kilometers away sky mirror would work?
What is Sky mirror btw - where is definition of it?

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #20 on: January 11, 2010, 11:43:37 PM »
What sky mirror. You talking that when the Sun is in the opposite point, some far tens thousand kilometers away sky mirror would work?

Yes. It's very high up, you see. And big.

What is Sky mirror btw - where is definition of it?

It is a mirror in the sky.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #21 on: January 11, 2010, 11:46:36 PM »
What sky mirror. You talking that when the Sun is in the opposite point, some far tens thousand kilometers away sky mirror would work?

Yes. It's very high up, you see. And big.

What is Sky mirror btw - where is definition of it?

It is a mirror in the sky.

Is artificial thing or natural?
If natural, then the light rays going from sun reflects where?

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2010, 11:50:07 PM »
Is artificial thing or natural?
If natural, then the light rays going from sun reflects where?

It is natural. I'm not sure what you mean by your second question.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2010, 11:53:58 PM »
Is artificial thing or natural?
If natural, then the light rays going from sun reflects where?

It is natural. I'm not sure what you mean by your second question.

I mean. Rays from sun goes where to reflect from? And after that reflection they go futher to create the constant half-year day in the Antarctica.
Basically, how it is works?

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #24 on: January 11, 2010, 11:56:13 PM »
I mean. Rays from sun goes where to reflect from? And after that reflection they go futher to create the constant half-year day in the Antarctica.
Basically, how it is works?

Light from the Sun goes to the mirror. It then reflects off the mirror and comes to the ground.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #25 on: January 12, 2010, 12:02:36 AM »
I mean. Rays from sun goes where to reflect from? And after that reflection they go futher to create the constant half-year day in the Antarctica.
Basically, how it is works?

Light from the Sun goes to the mirror. It then reflects off the mirror and comes to the ground.

Huh.
Then, what is that mirror? If sun is 3000 miles up in the sky, where is that surface it reflects off?

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #26 on: January 12, 2010, 12:56:40 AM »
Huh.
Then, what is that mirror? If sun is 3000 miles up in the sky, where is that surface it reflects off?


Not to mention the Sun is a spotlight.

?

d00gz

  • 638
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #27 on: January 12, 2010, 01:08:30 AM »
Provide evidence, or anything you say about the "sky mirror" might aswel be ignored.

Go to Antarctica in summer and look at the sky. There is evidence that the earth is round.

EFA.

You know as well as i do, that if you can call that evidence, so can RE.

Other than "I made it up, so it's true" do you have any evidence to support this ridiculous claim?

?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #28 on: January 12, 2010, 01:09:17 AM »
Huh.
Then, what is that mirror? If sun is 3000 miles up in the sky, where is that surface it reflects off?


Not to mention the Sun is a spotlight.

=)) well. it still can be a spotlight and reflect off sky mirror, or better to say refract.. well, anyway. I am almost RE'er now.
No major answer, just 2 words sky mirror are not  enough.

?

d00gz

  • 638
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #29 on: January 12, 2010, 02:27:03 AM »
Can it? As a spotlight, it shines down the way, if this was the case, surely we would see the great "sky mirror"?