While it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.
Quote from: Kira-SY on November 13, 2010, 12:35:08 PMThis website explains very well what I meant, if you want to go to the Sharks and Crocodiles directly, it's right after the last image:http://hubpages.com/hub/Some-Organisms-do-not-Evolve-into-more-Complex-FormsWow. Whoever made that page got their understanding of evolution from pokemon I'm guessing.Complex is a relative term, any change in an organism to better survive in its new environment, (even if it is a tiny change like the shape of blood cells) changes the organism. Is it now more complex? Who knows. Is it evolving? Yes.While it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.All organisms evolve.
This website explains very well what I meant, if you want to go to the Sharks and Crocodiles directly, it's right after the last image:http://hubpages.com/hub/Some-Organisms-do-not-Evolve-into-more-Complex-Forms
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards
Quote from: Raist on November 13, 2010, 02:30:50 PMWhile it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.Mutating /= evolving.
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
We're all jealous of Raist.
Quote from: Raist on November 13, 2010, 02:30:50 PMQuote from: Kira-SY on November 13, 2010, 12:35:08 PMThis website explains very well what I meant, if you want to go to the Sharks and Crocodiles directly, it's right after the last image:http://hubpages.com/hub/Some-Organisms-do-not-Evolve-into-more-Complex-FormsWow. Whoever made that page got their understanding of evolution from pokemon I'm guessing.Complex is a relative term, any change in an organism to better survive in its new environment, (even if it is a tiny change like the shape of blood cells) changes the organism. Is it now more complex? Who knows. Is it evolving? Yes.While it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.All organisms evolve.False. There are terminal species in many places in Evolution, for example.
Quote from: Crustinator on November 13, 2010, 03:51:55 PMQuote from: Raist on November 13, 2010, 02:30:50 PMWhile it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.Mutating /= evolving.if it is passed on it does.
Quote from: ClockTower on November 13, 2010, 03:57:13 PMQuote from: Raist on November 13, 2010, 02:30:50 PMQuote from: Kira-SY on November 13, 2010, 12:35:08 PMThis website explains very well what I meant, if you want to go to the Sharks and Crocodiles directly, it's right after the last image:http://hubpages.com/hub/Some-Organisms-do-not-Evolve-into-more-Complex-FormsWow. Whoever made that page got their understanding of evolution from pokemon I'm guessing.Complex is a relative term, any change in an organism to better survive in its new environment, (even if it is a tiny change like the shape of blood cells) changes the organism. Is it now more complex? Who knows. Is it evolving? Yes.While it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.All organisms evolve.False. There are terminal species in many places in Evolution, for example.Lol, a terminal species?An extinct species perhaps, but all extant species build up mutations and change with time. Even if the phenotype changes are not obvious.
Quote from: Raist on November 14, 2010, 10:25:16 AMQuote from: ClockTower on November 13, 2010, 03:57:13 PMQuote from: Raist on November 13, 2010, 02:30:50 PMQuote from: Kira-SY on November 13, 2010, 12:35:08 PMThis website explains very well what I meant, if you want to go to the Sharks and Crocodiles directly, it's right after the last image:http://hubpages.com/hub/Some-Organisms-do-not-Evolve-into-more-Complex-FormsWow. Whoever made that page got their understanding of evolution from pokemon I'm guessing.Complex is a relative term, any change in an organism to better survive in its new environment, (even if it is a tiny change like the shape of blood cells) changes the organism. Is it now more complex? Who knows. Is it evolving? Yes.While it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.All organisms evolve.False. There are terminal species in many places in Evolution, for example.Lol, a terminal species?An extinct species perhaps, but all extant species build up mutations and change with time. Even if the phenotype changes are not obvious.<sigh> Why do I even try to educate so many? Did you even try to learn what a terminal species is?Reference: terminal species usage,
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
Quote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 10:30:56 AMQuote from: Raist on November 14, 2010, 10:25:16 AMQuote from: ClockTower on November 13, 2010, 03:57:13 PMQuote from: Raist on November 13, 2010, 02:30:50 PMQuote from: Kira-SY on November 13, 2010, 12:35:08 PMThis website explains very well what I meant, if you want to go to the Sharks and Crocodiles directly, it's right after the last image:http://hubpages.com/hub/Some-Organisms-do-not-Evolve-into-more-Complex-FormsWow. Whoever made that page got their understanding of evolution from pokemon I'm guessing.Complex is a relative term, any change in an organism to better survive in its new environment, (even if it is a tiny change like the shape of blood cells) changes the organism. Is it now more complex? Who knows. Is it evolving? Yes.While it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.All organisms evolve.False. There are terminal species in many places in Evolution, for example.Lol, a terminal species?An extinct species perhaps, but all extant species build up mutations and change with time. Even if the phenotype changes are not obvious.<sigh> Why do I even try to educate so many? Did you even try to learn what a terminal species is?Reference: terminal species usage,lol, nice fail Clocktower. Now perhaps you could actually provide a link that explains what a "terminal species" is, because that one provides absolutely no relevant information, and a google search seems to come up empty in terms of actually providing a definition of the term.
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 12:50:59 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 10:30:56 AMQuote from: Raist on November 14, 2010, 10:25:16 AMQuote from: ClockTower on November 13, 2010, 03:57:13 PMQuote from: Raist on November 13, 2010, 02:30:50 PMQuote from: Kira-SY on November 13, 2010, 12:35:08 PMThis website explains very well what I meant, if you want to go to the Sharks and Crocodiles directly, it's right after the last image:http://hubpages.com/hub/Some-Organisms-do-not-Evolve-into-more-Complex-FormsWow. Whoever made that page got their understanding of evolution from pokemon I'm guessing.Complex is a relative term, any change in an organism to better survive in its new environment, (even if it is a tiny change like the shape of blood cells) changes the organism. Is it now more complex? Who knows. Is it evolving? Yes.While it is possible for an organism to exist for millions of years without building up mutations in its genome, it is so unlikely odds are that it would not happen in this universe.All organisms evolve.False. There are terminal species in many places in Evolution, for example.Lol, a terminal species?An extinct species perhaps, but all extant species build up mutations and change with time. Even if the phenotype changes are not obvious.<sigh> Why do I even try to educate so many? Did you even try to learn what a terminal species is?Reference: terminal species usage,lol, nice fail Clocktower. Now perhaps you could actually provide a link that explains what a "terminal species" is, because that one provides absolutely no relevant information, and a google search seems to come up empty in terms of actually providing a definition of the term.Since you know how to use Google, I'll leave it to you to educate yourself. Did you remember to put "terminal species" in quotes in the Google search parameters? Enjoy your journey of discovery.
I tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:23:48 PMI tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!Nope. Your failure here is your own alone.
Quote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:31:16 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:23:48 PMI tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!Nope. Your failure here is your own alone.You've always been the first to demand proof and references for what other people have said in the debate. Don't you realize how hypocritical you're being right now?
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:38:35 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:31:16 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:23:48 PMI tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!Nope. Your failure here is your own alone.You've always been the first to demand proof and references for what other people have said in the debate. Don't you realize how hypocritical you're being right now?False. I'm not always first. That I won't hold your hand this time reflects only that I'm bored with you and your laziness. I just Googled >"Terminal species" definition taxonomy< and received 990 hits. Now can you manage?
Quote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:44:41 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:38:35 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:31:16 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:23:48 PMI tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!Nope. Your failure here is your own alone.You've always been the first to demand proof and references for what other people have said in the debate. Don't you realize how hypocritical you're being right now?False. I'm not always first. That I won't hold your hand this time reflects only that I'm bored with you and your laziness. I just Googled >"Terminal species" definition taxonomy< and received 990 hits. Now can you manage?Fine, continue to be a hypocrite, and we will just ignore you.
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:50:27 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:44:41 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:38:35 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:31:16 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:23:48 PMI tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!Nope. Your failure here is your own alone.You've always been the first to demand proof and references for what other people have said in the debate. Don't you realize how hypocritical you're being right now?False. I'm not always first. That I won't hold your hand this time reflects only that I'm bored with you and your laziness. I just Googled >"Terminal species" definition taxonomy< and received 990 hits. Now can you manage?Fine, continue to be a hypocrite, and we will just ignore you.I point you to 990 hits, and you still complain. I guess you're already ignoring me. How sad. You might have actually learned something about Evolution.
Quote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:52:43 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:50:27 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:44:41 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:38:35 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:31:16 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:23:48 PMI tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!Nope. Your failure here is your own alone.You've always been the first to demand proof and references for what other people have said in the debate. Don't you realize how hypocritical you're being right now?False. I'm not always first. That I won't hold your hand this time reflects only that I'm bored with you and your laziness. I just Googled >"Terminal species" definition taxonomy< and received 990 hits. Now can you manage?Fine, continue to be a hypocrite, and we will just ignore you.I point you to 990 hits, and you still complain. I guess you're already ignoring me. How sad. You might have actually learned something about Evolution.Just show me which one I can link to that will show me the definition of terminal species.
Sorry Roundy, but I'm going to have to go with ClockTower on this one.http://books.google.com/books?id=lzXiyPbJ594C&lpg=PA126&ots=JhKFFxMO-n&dq=%22terminal%20species%22&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q=%22terminal%20species%22&f=false
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 02:14:31 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:52:43 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:50:27 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:44:41 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:38:35 PMQuote from: ClockTower on November 14, 2010, 01:31:16 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 01:23:48 PMI tried this and got nothing. Surely you're not implying that you can't back your own point up; that's such an important thing to you!Nope. Your failure here is your own alone.You've always been the first to demand proof and references for what other people have said in the debate. Don't you realize how hypocritical you're being right now?False. I'm not always first. That I won't hold your hand this time reflects only that I'm bored with you and your laziness. I just Googled >"Terminal species" definition taxonomy< and received 990 hits. Now can you manage?Fine, continue to be a hypocrite, and we will just ignore you.I point you to 990 hits, and you still complain. I guess you're already ignoring me. How sad. You might have actually learned something about Evolution.Just show me which one I can link to that will show me the definition of terminal species.Sorry Roundy, but I'm going to have to go with ClockTower on this one.http://books.google.com/books?id=lzXiyPbJ594C&lpg=PA126&ots=JhKFFxMO-n&dq=%22terminal%20species%22&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q=%22terminal%20species%22&f=false
I type in ""Terminal species" evolution" and " "Terminal species"biology" and the most I got was references to amino acids.It seems Clocktower completely made something up. For shame!
markjo, I'm sorry, but fail. That link has nothing to do with evolution.
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 02:48:24 PMmarkjo, I'm sorry, but fail. That link has nothing to do with evolution. Are you suggesting that genetics, and the associated chemical reactions, have nothing to do with evolution?
Quote from: markjo on November 14, 2010, 06:28:41 PMQuote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on November 14, 2010, 02:48:24 PMmarkjo, I'm sorry, but fail. That link has nothing to do with evolution. Are you suggesting that genetics, and the associated chemical reactions, have nothing to do with evolution? Why do I not get any results when I search for the word "genetics?"
QuoteAll organisms evolve.False. There are terminal species in many places in Evolution, for example.
All organisms evolve.